Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Mental illness and criminal responsibility [Letter]

As a criminal defense attorney with more than 13 years experience, I feel compelled to respond to Richard E. Vatz's recent op-ed ridiculing a Texas judge who accepted the claim of a defendant in a manslaughter case that he was a victim of the wealthy surroundings he'd grown up in and therefore unable to tell right from wrong ("'Affluenza': Just the latest way to shirk responsibility," Dec. 18).

While I do not question Mr. Vatz's expertise in his chosen field of psychology, his article makes clear what is either his ignorance of the law or a willful attempt to mislead readers of The Sun regarding the meaning of a "not criminally responsible" plea.

Fueling Mr. Vatz's outrage are judges who take into consideration such mitigating factors as whether or not a person is suffering from "extreme mental or emotional disorders."

Does Mr. Vatz feel that judges should not take into consideration such serious disorders when handing down sentences? State judges, in particular, have wide latitude in sentencing and are obligated to consider all facts and circumstances when making one of the most serious decisions entrusted to them by the public — that of curtailing the liberty of citizens.

To ignore the mental condition of the defendant would be to turn a blind eye to one of the actors a judge is bound by law to consider.

Mr. Vatz goes on to confuse sentencing mitigation factors, which by definition occur only after a verdict has been rendered, with the initial entry of a "not criminally responsible" plea.

Mr. Vatz states that "the entirety of insanity pleas ... is an opportunity to escape responsibility." On the contrary, these pleas do not provide an outlet for escaping responsibility but ensure that the state does not punish with incarceration people who, because of a mental disorder or mental retardation, lack substantial capacity to either appreciate the criminality of the conduct or conform that conduct to the requirements of the law.

A person cannot be at the same time both "escaping responsibility" and "incapable of responsibility."

I can only conclude that Mr. Vatz would have people found by independent, court-appointed psychiatrists to be so profoundly mentally retarded or impaired as to be unable to distinguish right from wrong to be as legally liable for their crimes as normally functioning members of society.

Presumably, Mr Vatz would also have these individuals suffer the same punishment. But to do so would be to return to a time in Western jurisprudence of which most thinking people in the 21st century are rightly ashamed.

Brian Young, Catonsville

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Left-wing opinion keeps creeping into Sun “news” articles
    Left-wing opinion keeps creeping into Sun “news” articles

    Another example of left wing media bias appeared in the Sunday Sun in what was a news article. Not opinion, not commentary. In the news article from the Washington Post headlined "Congress circumventing defense cuts it legislated," reporter Walter Pincus writes that the "supercommittee"...

  • O'Malley knows coronations
    O'Malley knows coronations

    The report that former Gov. Martin O'Malley doesn't want Hillary Clinton "coronated" shows just how clueless he is ("O'Malley: Democrats shouldn't coronate Hillary Clinton," March 29). Wasn't Anthony Brown "coronated" by Mr. O'Malley to be our next governor? He should have asked the voters...

  • School construction needs are questionable
    School construction needs are questionable

    The Sun recently reported that the General Assembly is authorizing $20 million for school construction in addition to Gov. Larry Hogan's budget of over $200 million for school-related building and renovations ("Assembly proposes more school construction aid for counties," March 27).

  • Obama should be impeached for meddling with Israeli elections
    Obama should be impeached for meddling with Israeli elections

    It is now a clear fact that President Barack Obama interfered in the recent election of Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel, which is an impeachable offense. Now where are the Republicans in Congress who need to and should draw up articles of impeachment?

  • What City Hall scandal will The Sun uncover next week?
    What City Hall scandal will The Sun uncover next week?

    Seems as if The Sun is able to turn over scandals in the city administration weekly ("City agency director has law firm with state contract on the side," March 28. It is hard to believe what so-called professionals in Baltimore are able to get away with. Where is the oversight, or, is it part...

  • Annapolis and speed cameras
    Annapolis and speed cameras

    Isn't it amazing how the courts have found that speed cameras are a safety feature and not an un-mandated nuisance tax, yet The Sun finds the news in the loss of revenue instead of the great job they are doing in slowing down traffic and clogging up the streets of Annapolis with bumper to...

Comments
Loading