Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Mental illness and criminal responsibility [Letter]

As a criminal defense attorney with more than 13 years experience, I feel compelled to respond to Richard E. Vatz's recent op-ed ridiculing a Texas judge who accepted the claim of a defendant in a manslaughter case that he was a victim of the wealthy surroundings he'd grown up in and therefore unable to tell right from wrong ("'Affluenza': Just the latest way to shirk responsibility," Dec. 18).

While I do not question Mr. Vatz's expertise in his chosen field of psychology, his article makes clear what is either his ignorance of the law or a willful attempt to mislead readers of The Sun regarding the meaning of a "not criminally responsible" plea.

Fueling Mr. Vatz's outrage are judges who take into consideration such mitigating factors as whether or not a person is suffering from "extreme mental or emotional disorders."

Does Mr. Vatz feel that judges should not take into consideration such serious disorders when handing down sentences? State judges, in particular, have wide latitude in sentencing and are obligated to consider all facts and circumstances when making one of the most serious decisions entrusted to them by the public — that of curtailing the liberty of citizens.

To ignore the mental condition of the defendant would be to turn a blind eye to one of the actors a judge is bound by law to consider.

Mr. Vatz goes on to confuse sentencing mitigation factors, which by definition occur only after a verdict has been rendered, with the initial entry of a "not criminally responsible" plea.

Mr. Vatz states that "the entirety of insanity pleas ... is an opportunity to escape responsibility." On the contrary, these pleas do not provide an outlet for escaping responsibility but ensure that the state does not punish with incarceration people who, because of a mental disorder or mental retardation, lack substantial capacity to either appreciate the criminality of the conduct or conform that conduct to the requirements of the law.

A person cannot be at the same time both "escaping responsibility" and "incapable of responsibility."

I can only conclude that Mr. Vatz would have people found by independent, court-appointed psychiatrists to be so profoundly mentally retarded or impaired as to be unable to distinguish right from wrong to be as legally liable for their crimes as normally functioning members of society.

Presumably, Mr Vatz would also have these individuals suffer the same punishment. But to do so would be to return to a time in Western jurisprudence of which most thinking people in the 21st century are rightly ashamed.

Brian Young, Catonsville

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Baltimore's bane: Drugs and single-parent households

    Baltimore's bane: Drugs and single-parent households

    It was with deep regret and sadness that I looked closely at the pictures of each of my 45 fellow Baltimore residents murdered in July ("45 murders in 31 days: Looking back at Baltimore's deadliest month," Aug. 29).

  • Windjammer sets tone for helping others

    Windjammer sets tone for helping others

    I was fortunate enough to attend Windjammer, and the article in The Sun does a fantastic job of describing the raw emotions and sentiment projected by all of those who played ("Windjammer festival marks a beautiful moment in Baltimore music," Aug. 30). I think Sam Herring put it very succinctly...

  • Make a healthy harvest available to all

    Make a healthy harvest available to all

    I applaud Healthy Harvest's mission of finding a market for fresh and edible produce "rejects" ("Howard start-up targets food waste," Aug. 26).

  • Why are so many homicide victims black?

    Why are so many homicide victims black?

    I am shocked by your recent report that virtually all Baltimore City homicide victims are minorities ("45 murders in 31 days: Looking back at Baltimore's deadliest month," Aug. 29).

  • Renaming peak a wrong priority

    Renaming peak a wrong priority

    As usual and with his myopic view of issues, President Barack Obama chose to direct his foolishness to renaming Mount McKinley rather than the importance of energy issues in the United States ("Alaska-bound, Obama renames America's tallest peak," Aug. 31).

  • Make parties pay for closed primaries

    Make parties pay for closed primaries

    The Democratic and Republican parties don't want open primaries ("Open the primaries," Aug. 31)? Fine, I'm good with that. After all, the purpose of primaries is for members of a party to select the candidates from their parties for the next election.

Comments
Loading
84°