Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Support adoptive same-sex couples

I read the results of the Sun poll on November 19 which reported that 53 percent of Marylanders would support a law to continue to discriminate against gay people in adoption issues. The ideal place to raise a child may be a home with a happily married husband and wife, but don't 50 percent of marriages end in divorce?

The whole issue, it seems to me, revolves around the verses in the Bible that were translated hundreds of years ago and have gradually been reinterpreted to condemn homosexuality. Many people base objections to gay people, gay marriage and gay adoption on Bible verses that may have been inaccurately translated, saying, "If it is in the Bible, it must be true." Besides the errors in translation that some Bible researchers have found, many Biblical instructions are no longer accepted as truth. Examples are the instruction that women shall not speak in church (Corinthians 14:34), and that men should not cut their beards (Leviticus).

Jesus never talked about homosexuality in the recorded words of the New Testament, but he did talk about divorce. Nevertheless, how many divorced heterosexuals are allowed to be ministers, officers or other church administrators? If you believe that every word in the Bible is true, then you must follow every word. Not to do so is hypocritical, one main reason that many people reject the church and choose not to attend.

Also, I cannot fathom how African-Americans can support discrimination against gay people. No, it is not the same as the horror of slavery or the same as the struggle for equality of the 1950s and '60s for those who are black. (That comparison would make me angry, too.) However, it is discrimination.

If gay people want to marry someone they love and want the legal protections that are granted by marriage, who should be allowed to discriminate against them? (Unfortunately, the courts are still allowed to do so.) If there are gay people who want and are willing to adopt the unwanted children of heterosexuals or those kids who need a home, they should certainly be allowed to do so.

Sherry Hope, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • PSC unaffected by DGA contributions

    I am a big fan of transparency and disclosure in government, but one of the leaps made in The Sun's recent article about contributions by certain companies to the Democratic Governor's Association is misleading and needs to be corrected. ("Firms with Md. interests give to Democratic group,"...

  • Public financing of campaigns won't help

    Once again, The Sun urges the institution of public campaign financing, implying that if such a plan were instituted, private campaign contributions would disappear and we'd all live happily ever after ("Appearance of conflict," Nov. 29). Nothing could be further from the truth.

  • Term limits are the answer, not public campaign financing

    Just stop proposing public financing of political campaigns ("Appearance of conflict," Nov. 29).

  • The media doesn't just ignore the ethical lapses of liberals

    The writer from Marriottsville must have thrown a shoulder out of joint congratulating herself on detecting media bias in The Sun due to the alleged under-reporting of Rep. Nancy Pelosi's ethical difficulties concerning insider information ("Sun conveniently omits Pelosi's misdeed," Nov. 28)....

  • O'Malley right to defend farmers

    I applaud the action that Gov. Martin O'Malley has taken on the University of Maryland environmental law clinic and its legal pursuit of the Hudson farm family. There are now hundreds of farm families in Maryland that live in fear that they will be the next farm to be put in the brink of...

  • Rodricks wrong on bay pollution
    Rodricks wrong on bay pollution

    It is time for those writing for The Sun's editorial pages to check their facts. Columnist Dan Rodricks writes that poultry farmers are allowing their chicken manure to run into the Chesapeake Bay ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13.

  • Protest unnecessary when justice is served
    Protest unnecessary when justice is served

    Have they really missed the point? First, it was Police Commissioner Anthony Batts who wondered if there would be protest marches following the alleged shooting of police officer Andrew Groman by a black man, Donte Jones, here in Baltimore. Then there was the letter from a reader complaining...

  • Batts got it right by standing up for his officers
    Batts got it right by standing up for his officers

    Three cheers to Baltimore City Police Commissioner Anthony Batts for his comments regarding the police officer who was shot while on duty ("Officer shot in West Baltimore," Dec. 15).

Comments
Loading