Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

ACA's horrors just beginning [Letter]

The recent commentary by Vincent DeMarco regarding the Affordable Care Act was a bad summary of the facts ("Don't forget the ACA's true purpose," Dec. 16). Let's remember the law's true purpose — a transfer of wealth to bring roughly one-seventh of the U.S. economy under government control.

The commentary states that it's "about making health care more affordable for Marylanders," but this is not true. Marylanders will now pay greater premiums and higher deductibles for additional coverage they do not need, such as coverage for pregnancy on the policy of a 60-year-old female or a single male. If particular Marylanders cannot afford the higher premiums, the taxpayers will provide them a subsidy. Or, of course, they will simply pay the small fine (defined as a "tax" by Chief Justice John Roberts, although President Barack Obama and the Congress both vehemently denied it) and forego the expense, knowing that they can get coverage only when needed. They will see fewer doctors, visit fewer hospitals, wait longer and face rationing of necessary care. Many will find their work cut back to 29.5 hours per week to avoid the requirement of employer-provided coverage, and many others will simply lose employer-provided coverage as businesses pay the fine for dropping employees rather than the cost of covering them.

Businesses will continue to defer hiring and investments as the Obama administration, often by fiat, changes the laws, deferring some mandates and granting waivers to others. Taxes will increase and a neat hidden penalty will arrive for those who sign up for Medicaid — the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1993 requires states to pursue Medicaid asset recovery from persons who receive benefits at age 55 or older. This recovery could be for any items or services provided, causing many of the elderly to lose their assets. Finally, studies project over 15 million will still not be covered after full implementation — we don't know when that is, but rest assured, it will deferred until after an election.

Sorry, Mr. DeMarco, it's not about people, it's about control. And it's brought to you by the people who built the website and who had to pass the law to know what it contained.

Douglas Dribben, Woodstock

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • An incomplete report on payments to doctors from drug companies [Letter]

    It actually doesn't do much good to head up an article about payments to doctors by telling readers that a doctor invented a great new device and the company sent him a check for royalties ("Payments to doctors from drug companies, device makers revealed," Oct. 4).

  • Health exchange still a hassle

    Health exchange still a hassle

    I found The Sun's editorial, "Beyond the website" (Nov. 23), about how well the new-and-improved Maryland Health Connection had launched to be ironic and not in a good way. Perhaps you should have looked beyond the health insurance website itself to see if the system really had been improved from...

  • Gruber and his liberal lies

    Gruber and his liberal lies

    Nice coverage of the Jonathan Gruber hearing which amounted to, I think, about 60 words ("Obamacare adviser sorry for comments," Dec. 10). He appeared to spend most of the time denying, lying and obfuscating — true traits of liberals these days.

  • Md. lawmakers can help those with chronic conditions

    Md. lawmakers can help those with chronic conditions

    On behalf of Marylanders with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PI), the Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) applauds the MedChi CEO Gene Ransom for standing up to insurance companies looking to take advantage of our state's Health Benefits Exchange patients ("The high cost of health care reform,"...

  • Why has The Sun neglected the Jonathan Gruber scandal?

    Why has The Sun neglected the Jonathan Gruber scandal?

    Your systematic neglect of the horrendous Jonathan Gruber/Obamacare scandal is undoubtedly attributable to your partisan bias ("Gruber flap reopens not-so-old wounds," Dec. 1).

  • Unaffordable care in Bel Air

    Unaffordable care in Bel Air

    I am 59 years old, have been a practicing family physician for 30 years and I can't wait to pay my new health care premium for 2015. This past year, I paid $680 a month for my wife and me with a $5,400 deductible. With the Affordable Care Act, in 2015, I will be paying $700 a month with a $12,000...

  • CareFirst's surprise birthday gift

    CareFirst's surprise birthday gift

    I got an unexpected present after turning 70 in December — a 35 percent premium increase on my Medigap insurance from CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield.

  • Obamacare's big day

    Obamacare's big day

    It received surprisingly little fanfare, but last week three states demonstrated how to "fix" the Affordable Care Act, should the Supreme Court rule adversely against a key provision within it. Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Delaware all received permission to set up state health insurance exchanges...

Comments
Loading

82°