Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Keystone XL pipeline, bringing oil from Canada, is a step toward the future

Civil disobedience on behalf of causes we believe in is a time-honored American tradition ("Going to jail for the environment," August 22). Another time-honored American tradition is keeping an open mind about the issues, listening to different views and then forming an opinion. It is too bad that Mike Tidwell and Cindy Parker and the others who chose to get arrested in front of the White House to protest the Keystone XL pipeline have turned their back on that tradition.

Wind energy will one day play a significant role in America's energy future, as will other renewables. But that day will not come anytime soon, for it takes years to acquire approvals and permits, secure financing and build the infrastructure. America's oil and natural gas companies believe in alternative energy, and that is why they are investing billions of dollars in developing the technologies that will get us to a green energy future. But they are also working to make certain that Americans have the energy they need in the meantime.

That is what the Keystone XL project is all about. When built, it will be a part of the nation's energy future that, of necessity, calls for diverse sources. It will bring oil from Canada — our "stable, steady and reliable" neighbor, to quote President Obama, to the nation's heartland. That oil, by the way, has almost the same chemical composition as much of the oil that already flows through our pipeline system. The pipeline will also create jobs — thousands of them — at a time when Americans all over are desperate for work.

Canadian sands crude oil can be refined by American refineries — among the cleanest, most advanced in the world — to benefit U.S. consumers. Saying no to oil sands crude won't halt its development. It'll only mean that the oil will be shipped to other countries with less-stringent refining regulations.

Cindy Schild, Washington

The writer is a refinery manager with the American Petroleum Institute.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • If Keystone would help the economy, what about upgrading our infrastructure?
    If Keystone would help the economy, what about upgrading our infrastructure?

    Whether you are for or against the Keystone XL pipeline, The Sun's recent article revealed what $1 dollar spent on infrastructure can return to the economy ("Nebraska Court OKs route for Keystone pipeline," Jan. 10).

  • Keystone offers little benefit to U.S.
    Keystone offers little benefit to U.S.

    The permitting and construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline has become a controversial political issue, and its passage is the top priority of the Republican leadership in the Congress ("The Republican agenda," Jan. 5).

  • Keystone XL is an outdated technology for meeting tomorrow's needs
    Keystone XL is an outdated technology for meeting tomorrow's needs

    It makes no sense to invest billions of dollars in a dead-end technology like the Keystone XL pipeline, which will be obsolete and of ever-declining value over the next dozen years as we burn up yet more of our dwindling fossil fuel reserves ("Keystone comes up dry," Nov. 19).

  • Keystone comes up dry
    Keystone comes up dry

    Tuesday evening's Senate vote to approve the Keystone XL pipeline may have come up one vote shy of the necessary 60-vote margin, but it's surely not the last we've heard of the project. Republicans have become so enamored of TransCanada's vision of a 1,200-mile link from Canadian tar sands...

  • Our government is broken [Letter]
    Our government is broken [Letter]

    Canada has a shale oil supply that could have reduced U.S. reliance of oil imports from the Middle East, provided thousands of American jobs and ultimately lowered the price of gasoline for American citizens. But President Barack Obama has held the project hostage. Not the House of...

  • The real reason Obama hasn't approved Keystone [Letter]
    The real reason Obama hasn't approved Keystone [Letter]

    There are so many falsehoods and inaccuracies in your editorial that I cannot rebut them point by point ("The Keystone delay," April 22). I would rather present the facts about why the Keystone pipeline should have been approved years ago and why President Barack Obama's continued delays are...