Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Thank you, Andy Harris, for voting your principles

Letter writer William Ermatinger of Parkton ("In deficit morass, voters have themselves to blame," Aug 2) singled out "very conservative" Rep. Andy Harris in performing as his electorate would have in voting no on the debt ceiling legislation. I assume you are against Mr. Harris because he didn't compromise on his principle for a cut in actual spending and not only a reduction in the amount by which spending will be increased, as evidenced by his no vote on the debt ceiling legislation. If the no vote is evidence of unwilling compromisers, why didn't you identify the very liberal Democrats from the 3rd, 4th and 5th Congressional Districts who also voted no?

Their no vote was because the legislation did not include new taxes. But it was still a no vote. Non-compromisers! Did these representatives not perform as they had represented themselves to their electorate? I assume the enlightened voters in the 3rd, 4th and 5th Congressional Districts elected them to perform as they have. It's just us unenlightened voters in the 1st Congressional District that had the audacity to not elect a middle-of-the-road congressman preferred by non-1st Congressional District residents.

I got what I wished for, a not a middle-of-the-road congressman. Thank you, Rep. Harris, for voting your principles over your party's desire to compromise on a "deal."

Glenn Cunningham, Nottingham

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Schaller fails to see danger of U.S. debt

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller's analysis is incredibly myopic ("Avoiding Europe's austerity nightmare," April 18). To compare the economic condition of the U.S. to those of Greece or Spain at the beginning of the economic crisis is comparing apples and oranges.

  • Military spending is misplaced U.S. priority

    On April 17, I will be protesting war taxes at Baltimore's main post office. I realize that taxes fund many good programs — education, environment and diplomacy. But sadly when 57 percent of the federal budget goes to the Pentagon, the government's priorities are out of touch with the pressing...

  • A better budget remedy than the Buffett rule

    You end your editorial on the Buffett Rule ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13) with the question, "Where will the $50 billion come from to balance the budget, if not from this minimum tax plan?"

  • Skeptical of Buffett and need for higher taxes

    First, I'm an 80-year-old living on Social Security, and I know all the tax loopholes need to be closed ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13). But isn't it correct that Warren Buffett owes the IRS a great deal of taxes for a number of years? Let's have a true picture of Mr. Buffett.

  • The Buffett Rule backlash

    The Buffett Rule backlash

    Our view: Taxing the wealthy at rates others already face wouldn't solve the nation's deficit, but it would restore a modicum of fairness to the tax code

  • Godless Republicans turn back on poor and sick

    Some churchmen take exception to some of President Barack Obama's positions on matters of faith. I suggest these men of faith take a closer look at the true meaning of religion. All three Abrahamic religions — Christianity, Judaism and Islam — have as their central theme the commandments to protect...