Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Tea party congressmen are the last great hope to stop the tax and spend agenda

I am fed up with the over the top criticism the tea party congressmen have been getting from members of the Obama Administration, Democrats in the Senate and the House, liberal pundits, and even from the inside the beltway Republicans who don't appreciate the fact that if it were not for the tea party freshmen class in the House, the Democrats would have remained the majority party. Vice President Joe Biden most recently called the tea party members of Congress "terrorists." Other liberals have labeled tea party advocates as stupid or dangerous.

The tea party members in the House are the last great hope of stopping this massive tax and spend agenda of President Obama from leading this nation over the cliff to financial disaster and destroying our freedoms and way of life. The tea party Congressmen elected to office are a product of millions of Americans of the tea party movement who have stood up and said, "enough is enough" of this out of control government.

If the tea party, which is trying to save this country, are "terrorists," then what would one call the government run by the Obama administration and liberals in Congress with the failed stimulus bills and bailouts, a monstrous federal health care law that nobody read, out of control spending, over regulation of the private sector, refusal to drill for the ample domestic supply of gas and oil during this energy crisis, the arrogance to tell us what foods we should eat, and even what kind of light bulbs we can burn in our homes. The labels that come readily to my mind are "dictatorship," "socialist state," and "an arrogant ruling class."

John A. Malagrin, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Schaller fails to see danger of U.S. debt

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller's analysis is incredibly myopic ("Avoiding Europe's austerity nightmare," April 18). To compare the economic condition of the U.S. to those of Greece or Spain at the beginning of the economic crisis is comparing apples and oranges.

  • Military spending is misplaced U.S. priority

    On April 17, I will be protesting war taxes at Baltimore's main post office. I realize that taxes fund many good programs — education, environment and diplomacy. But sadly when 57 percent of the federal budget goes to the Pentagon, the government's priorities are out of touch with the pressing...

  • A better budget remedy than the Buffett rule

    You end your editorial on the Buffett Rule ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13) with the question, "Where will the $50 billion come from to balance the budget, if not from this minimum tax plan?"

  • Skeptical of Buffett and need for higher taxes

    First, I'm an 80-year-old living on Social Security, and I know all the tax loopholes need to be closed ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13). But isn't it correct that Warren Buffett owes the IRS a great deal of taxes for a number of years? Let's have a true picture of Mr. Buffett.

  • The Buffett Rule backlash

    The Buffett Rule backlash

    Our view: Taxing the wealthy at rates others already face wouldn't solve the nation's deficit, but it would restore a modicum of fairness to the tax code

  • Godless Republicans turn back on poor and sick

    Some churchmen take exception to some of President Barack Obama's positions on matters of faith. I suggest these men of faith take a closer look at the true meaning of religion. All three Abrahamic religions — Christianity, Judaism and Islam — have as their central theme the commandments to protect...