Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Teachers union head misses the mark in critique of Rolley's voucher plan

While I have little desire to get into a philosophical debate with the teachers' union over the concept of vouchers in general, I feel compelled to respond to Marietta English's commentary in The Sun about Otis Rolley's education platform. ("Balto. teachers union head: Rolley's voucher plan isn't the answer," June 22).

Ms. English accuses Mr. Rolley of including vouchers in his platform as "campaign rhetoric," yet she herself relies pretty heavily on rhetoric to criticize it. For example, she cites a study of a pilot program in New York that suggests a broad voucher program would result in "a two-tiered system of schools divided along economic and racial lines." And she points to another researcher in Arizona who estimates that vouchers in that state were a windfall for wealthy parents whose students were already in private schools.

Both of these examples are red herrings meant to paint Mr. Rolley's proposal as class warfare or, even worse, a solution that will further divide our city along racial lines. First of all, he is not recommending a broad, system-wide voucher program as a "solution" to the poor quality of our schools. Mr. Rolley has proposed a very targeted — and limited — use of vouchers as an immediate remedy for students in our worst middle schools, not as a long-term fix for the district's problems. It is a recognition that, although some improvements have been made, it is unfair for us to ask our current students to suffer through inadequate schools while we make incremental improvements that may help future generations of students.

Secondly, Ms. English ignores the fact that Mr. Rolley called for means testing these limited vouchers, preventing the kind of windfall that Arizona may have provided to wealthy parents. Not to mention the fact that the students at Baltimore's worst performing middle schools are virtually all students of color.

Ms. English also expresses concern that pulling up to $25 million in funding out of the district's budget will somehow halt the reforms that are working. Again, there has been some limited improvement, but it is not across the board, and it is not enough. Mr. Rolley's limited voucher program would no doubt help some students access better schools immediately. And since BCPSS has a budget that surpasses $1 billion per year, it is unlikely that this small program will derail other reform efforts of the district. It is even feasible that closing a handful of poor-performing schools might actually make it easier for the district to continue the gains that have been made in other schools.

Another criticism from Ms. English is that since $10,000 isn't enough to cover the tuition at places like Gillman or Friends, Mr. Rolley's voucher program would have no value to the targeted families. I say let's test that theory out. Let's ask Baltimore's families what they think. I personally think that there are plenty of parochial schools that perform better than Baltimore's worst middle schools where $10,000 would more than cover costs. And there are plenty of other families who might be able to cover half the cost at the more elite institutions. For them, that $10,000 voucher could make those schools accessible. Where is the harm in testing the market and seeing if it helps even some of the kids at the worst-performing schools?

Ms. English's last point — and the one I suspect she cares most about — is the idea that "fewer students in the public school system means that fewer teachers will be hired or retained." But that is only partly true. It, no doubt, means fewer teachers at BCPSS. But Mr. Rolley's proposed voucher program would be limited to schools in Baltimore City. Private and parochial schools hire teachers too, don't they? The net impact on the number of teaching jobs in the city would be zero, though fewer of those jobs would be dues-paying union jobs within BCPSS. And that may be what is really driving Ms. English's criticism.

Douglass Austin, Baltimore

The writer is the former chief of staff of the Baltimore City Public School System and father of a BCPSS middle school student.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Balto. teachers union head: Rolley's voucher plan isn't the answer

    Mayoral candidate Otis Rolley III announced last week his "platform" on the future of education for Baltimore City's youth. The cornerstone of Mr. Rolley's plan is a pledge to fund a private school voucher program to address what he has characterized as Baltimore's failing middle schools. Unfortunately,...

  • Rolley's education policy a head-scratcher

    After reading about Otis Rolley's platform on education ("Rolley urges vouchers, mayoral control of schools," June 12), I again found myself wondering, as I usually do: When are people going to wake up and realize that Baltimore's schools are not "bad schools"?

  • Rolley urges vouchers, mayoral control of Baltimore schools
    Rolley urges vouchers, mayoral control of Baltimore schools

    Mayoral candidate releases 'radical' education platform

  • What's a 'normal' president? How about one who's competent?
    What's a 'normal' president? How about one who's competent?

    I would hope that "normal" for the occupant of the White House would signify someone who displays competency in both domestic and foreign policy ("Does 'normal' mean a white man in the White House?" April 19). With absolutely no experience in foreign affairs, much less diplomacy, the present occupant...

  • Antidepressants Germanwings suicide
    Antidepressants Germanwings suicide

    In the op-ed "Antidepressants: A deadly treatment?" (April 11), Patrick Hahn links antidepressants to violence, specifically, suicide and homicide. He referred to reports made by Drs. Arnold Beisser and James Blanchard in 1961 about antidepressants increasing patient suicide rates. First, it is...

  • Rate increases lead to delinquent water bills
    Rate increases lead to delinquent water bills

    There is a good reason why some city residents have fallen behind on their water bills ("Protesters call on mayor to stop water shut-offs over unpaid bills," April 16). The cost is simply too high. When I purchased a property in the city in April 2013, the rate for water consumption was $3.197...

  • Rawlings-Blake water shut-offs are inhumane
    Rawlings-Blake water shut-offs are inhumane

    The United States searches for planets that have water. Scientists predict disaster for continents with insufficient water. Disease and epidemics spread in countries without clean water, as the U.N.'s public health workers know all too well. And kids here can be sent into foster care if they live...

  • Three simple rules to avoid police brutality
    Three simple rules to avoid police brutality

    Throughout the nation the alleged cases of police brutality have been in the forefront of the news ("Gray dies a week after his arrest," April 20). Everyone seems to be scrambling to get a handle on what is going on with our law enforcement officers, as there are more allegations than ever. There...