Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Teachers union head misses the mark in critique of Rolley's voucher plan

While I have little desire to get into a philosophical debate with the teachers' union over the concept of vouchers in general, I feel compelled to respond to Marietta English's commentary in The Sun about Otis Rolley's education platform. ("Balto. teachers union head: Rolley's voucher plan isn't the answer," June 22).

Ms. English accuses Mr. Rolley of including vouchers in his platform as "campaign rhetoric," yet she herself relies pretty heavily on rhetoric to criticize it. For example, she cites a study of a pilot program in New York that suggests a broad voucher program would result in "a two-tiered system of schools divided along economic and racial lines." And she points to another researcher in Arizona who estimates that vouchers in that state were a windfall for wealthy parents whose students were already in private schools.

Both of these examples are red herrings meant to paint Mr. Rolley's proposal as class warfare or, even worse, a solution that will further divide our city along racial lines. First of all, he is not recommending a broad, system-wide voucher program as a "solution" to the poor quality of our schools. Mr. Rolley has proposed a very targeted — and limited — use of vouchers as an immediate remedy for students in our worst middle schools, not as a long-term fix for the district's problems. It is a recognition that, although some improvements have been made, it is unfair for us to ask our current students to suffer through inadequate schools while we make incremental improvements that may help future generations of students.

Secondly, Ms. English ignores the fact that Mr. Rolley called for means testing these limited vouchers, preventing the kind of windfall that Arizona may have provided to wealthy parents. Not to mention the fact that the students at Baltimore's worst performing middle schools are virtually all students of color.

Ms. English also expresses concern that pulling up to $25 million in funding out of the district's budget will somehow halt the reforms that are working. Again, there has been some limited improvement, but it is not across the board, and it is not enough. Mr. Rolley's limited voucher program would no doubt help some students access better schools immediately. And since BCPSS has a budget that surpasses $1 billion per year, it is unlikely that this small program will derail other reform efforts of the district. It is even feasible that closing a handful of poor-performing schools might actually make it easier for the district to continue the gains that have been made in other schools.

Another criticism from Ms. English is that since $10,000 isn't enough to cover the tuition at places like Gillman or Friends, Mr. Rolley's voucher program would have no value to the targeted families. I say let's test that theory out. Let's ask Baltimore's families what they think. I personally think that there are plenty of parochial schools that perform better than Baltimore's worst middle schools where $10,000 would more than cover costs. And there are plenty of other families who might be able to cover half the cost at the more elite institutions. For them, that $10,000 voucher could make those schools accessible. Where is the harm in testing the market and seeing if it helps even some of the kids at the worst-performing schools?

Ms. English's last point — and the one I suspect she cares most about — is the idea that "fewer students in the public school system means that fewer teachers will be hired or retained." But that is only partly true. It, no doubt, means fewer teachers at BCPSS. But Mr. Rolley's proposed voucher program would be limited to schools in Baltimore City. Private and parochial schools hire teachers too, don't they? The net impact on the number of teaching jobs in the city would be zero, though fewer of those jobs would be dues-paying union jobs within BCPSS. And that may be what is really driving Ms. English's criticism.

Douglass Austin, Baltimore

The writer is the former chief of staff of the Baltimore City Public School System and father of a BCPSS middle school student.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Balto. teachers union head: Rolley's voucher plan isn't the answer

    Mayoral candidate Otis Rolley III announced last week his "platform" on the future of education for Baltimore City's youth. The cornerstone of Mr. Rolley's plan is a pledge to fund a private school voucher program to address what he has characterized as Baltimore's failing middle schools. Unfortunately,...

  • Rolley's education policy a head-scratcher

    After reading about Otis Rolley's platform on education ("Rolley urges vouchers, mayoral control of schools," June 12), I again found myself wondering, as I usually do: When are people going to wake up and realize that Baltimore's schools are not "bad schools"?

  • Rolley urges vouchers, mayoral control of Baltimore schools

    Rolley urges vouchers, mayoral control of Baltimore schools

    Mayoral candidate releases 'radical' education platform

  • Hubris of Baltimore 'plagues'

    Hubris of Baltimore 'plagues'

    Who is the Rev. James H. Bryant to invoke plagues on Baltimore? What kind of religious leader would dare to exhibit such hubris ("The 11th affliction," May 29)?

  • Criminals are responsible for crime

    Criminals are responsible for crime

    Regarding the commentary, "Justice isn't blind in Baltimore" (May 28), Nancy S. Forster, a former public defender, seems to have left out the meat of the matter — the criminals themselves. Ms. Forster blames the police, the current governor and the past mayor but not one iota of responsibility...

  • Male circumcision is abhorrent, too

    Male circumcision is abhorrent, too

    Is male circumcision also a human rights violation ("Masking the truth at the BMA," May 26)? Seventy-five percent of the men in the United States have been circumcised. Fortunately, fewer circumcisions are being performed every year.

  • Let preschoolers be preschoolers

    Let preschoolers be preschoolers

    In the discussions about high quality pre-K and Common Core standards, it seems to me that we are missing something important ("Ready for Kindergarten?" May 23). We are so focused on preparing young children for the future and using them to fix societal problems that we are not paying attention...

  • Don't connect Reginald Lewis and Freddie Gray

    Don't connect Reginald Lewis and Freddie Gray

    To bring Reginald Lewis into the debate surrounding the tragic death of Freddie Gray, as commentators Ron Busby Sr. and C. Earl Peek did in a recent op-ed, is wrong ("Baltimore, Reginald Lewis and Freddie Gray," May 16).