Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Op-Eds

Nuclear safety issues linger [Commentary]

Shades of Cold War anxiety were rekindled recently by reports that Air Force investigations were underway into alleged drug use, as well as cheating on preparedness tests, among nuclear missile launch officers working in the nation's pressure-cooker underground bunkers.

Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James told reporters that 11 officers at six such sites were suspected of illegal drug possession. According to the Associated Press, 34 of them at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana have had their security clearances suspended. It's alleged that some of them passed on to colleagues answers to questions gauging their knowledge of, and proficiency in, launching the 450 Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) aimed at various strategic targets around the globe.

The mission of the Air Force Global Command headquarters at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana is a carryover from the Cold War strategy of mutual assured destruction (MAD) that governed the postures of the U.S. and Soviet Union after their World War II alliance against Hitler.

Early predecessors in the launch bunkers were well aware of the trigger-finger tensions of the first years thereafter, and were particularly conditioned to the role they played. Two-man teams still work in around-the-clock shifts manning twin coded switches for simultaneous firing and security.

At the same time, then as now, an undisclosed number of nuclear-tipped bombs have been kept aloft by long-range bombers under a "fail-safe" system whereby pilots can release them only on presidential order delivered by code. Movies like "Fail-Safe" and "Dr. Strangelove" familiarized millions of American viewers with the peril of the nuclear age.

But according to the Associated Press, today's Air Force launch officers are mostly younger men and women of lower rank to whom the job assigned them in the post-Cold War era may seem outmoded with the end of the Soviet Union, and hence they may be less motivated in the work.

More than 50 years ago, as a reporter at the Pentagon, I stumbled on several stories that created a temporary storm among the military and civilian brass. A low-level bureaucrat tasked with checking on the super-secure missile launch system told me of a series of near-accidents involving disturbed launch officers working under extreme pressure in the bunkers housing the ICBMs and the complicated firing apparatus.

In one particular episode, a military officer based at a U.S. site in England, despondent over his wife's threatened divorce, climbed onto a missile and announced that he intended to explode it with a firearm. According to the report, the wife was summoned to the site and her husband was talked out of his threat.

This and other accounts I reported in my newspaper of the time were picked up elsewhere, resulting in pushback from the Pentagon, not denying the episodes but insisting that no nuclear weapon could be discharged in any such fashion. Some academic nuclear experts outside of government disagreed, but the Pentagon clung to its position in a press briefing.

Since then, numerous near-accidents and threats to nuclear safety have been reported and acknowledged, but by and large the still-present threat of a nuclear explosion has cooled in terms of public sensitivity. The issue most pointedly discussed these days is the possible acquisition of nuclear weapons by so-called rogue states like North Korea and Iran.

In the run-up to the American invasion of Iraq in 2003, the Bush administration cited fear of the use of non-nuclear weapons of mass destruction by the Saddam Hussein regime, or having them fall into the hands of terrorist organizations. The latter peril remains, but the need for retaining at least the scope of the underground missile launch force has been questioned in many quarters at home.

Recently, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel visited one such site and through a spokesman expressed his concern over reports of a breakdown in discipline among the missile launch officer corps. It's all a reminder that while the tensions and nuclear stare-down with the Soviet Union are over, the specter of nuclear Armageddon remains, requiring continued American vigilance.

Jules Witcover is a syndicated columnist and former long-time writer for The Baltimore Sun. His latest book is "Joe Biden: A Life of Trial and Redemption" (William Morrow). His email is juleswitcover@comcast.net.

To respond to this commentary, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The limits of diplomacy [Editorial]

    Our view: Geneva peace talks should focus on aid to Syrian refugees

  • Charter schools do not equal education reform
    Charter schools do not equal education reform

    As Philadelphia's Superintendent of Schools, I recommended the approval of more than 30 charter schools because I thought it would improve educational opportunity for our 215,000 students. The last 20 years make it clear I was wrong.

  • Retirement insecurity
    Retirement insecurity

    The "silver tsunami" predicted for Maryland, where more than 1 million workers have no retirement savings, is one that will sweep the rest of the country, too. As a matter of fact, the Employee Benefit Research Institute says the percentage of Marylanders with little or no savings is about...

  • Pre-booking diversion: an alternative to conviction and incarceration
    Pre-booking diversion: an alternative to conviction and incarceration

    In Baltimore City, approximately 20,000 people were arrested for drug-related offenses annually in 2012 and 2013; nearly three quarters for simple possession. And while there has been a great deal of discussion over the last few years regarding the incarceration of individuals for drug...

  • Hillary Clinton's identity crisis
    Hillary Clinton's identity crisis

    "Is Hillary Rodham Clinton a McDonald's Big Mac or a Chipotle burrito bowl? A can of Bud or a bottle of Blue Moon? JCPenney or J. Crew?"

  • The U.S. has yet to make good on its promise of reparations to black Americans
    The U.S. has yet to make good on its promise of reparations to black Americans

    Conversations about reparations are not about money but about people and about the way that people are seen and valued in our society. These are difficult conversations, and we have found that what is most challenging about the idea of reparations today is the notion that America still owes a...

Comments
Loading