Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Op-Eds

Protecting our protectors [Commentary]

We are often left with nothing but unanswerable questions after we lose someone to suicide. "Why?" becomes "did we miss the signs?" and usually culminates with "what could we have done?"

In March of 2011, I asked these questions after a soldier in my company, Specialist Brandon Smith, died by suicide in his home just outside of Fort Bragg, N.C. Brandon was 24, recently married, had just bought a home and had been back from a tour in Afghanistan for about six months.

Brandon was much loved by the men and women who served alongside him. At his funeral, our commanding officer said, "it's soldiers like Brandon Smith that keep the Army moving every day." When Brandon died, my piece of the Army stopped moving. We were all too busy asking ourselves those questions.

The veteran community and the nation as a whole continue to struggle with these same questions today. Yet our country has not even begun to wrap its head around the complexity of the problem. We hear that 22 veterans a day die from suicide, but the full nature of that staggering figure has been little explored.

The often-cited estimate comes from a 2012 Department of Veteran's Affairs report. However, what is less discussed is that only 21 of 50 states were included in the study. The report admits that states, "such as California and Texas, with larger Veteran populations" are not included. Virginia, one of the few states with a growing veteran population of a younger age, is also not included.

Another less cited fact from the report is that "69 percent of all Veteran suicides were among those aged 50 years and older" — so, of those 22 a day, about 15 of them are not the young veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan we imagine. While tragic cases of younger veterans often garner significant coverage, the current data show that a majority of suicides come from older generations.

Still, the prevalence of young veterans in states not included in the study could mean younger veterans' suicides are being underreported. The "22 a day" number may not be the full extent of the problem.

Which segments of veterans are most at risk? When are they most at risk? One year after separation, five years, or maybe 25? With a historic number of female veterans in our generation, are they getting one-size-fits-all mental health care that has been tailored for men? We cannot tackle the scourge of veteran suicides without fully understanding it first.

Unlike the questions we are left with after a suicide, these questions can be answered. They must be answered.

In an era when private companies use big data to predict our shopping habits, it is possible and necessary to use data collation and analysis to improve care for veterans. Better data sharing by states would allow the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to focus resources in locations with the greatest need, target those most at risk and help tailor care to fit the community.

Both Congressional and presidential action can help with this effort. Veterans support organizations like Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America are calling for such action. Other goals that even our diametrically opposed political parties should be able to agree on include:

•Appointing a national director of suicide prevention, to develop an overarching strategy for suicide prevention and mental health support and oversee its execution.

Filling the 1,000 mental health care jobs currently unfilled at the VA and improving incentives to recruit mental health professionals.

Increasing mental health care eligibility for combat veterans from 5 to 15 years. That would ensure veterans get care when issues appear, no matter how long it takes.

Finally, the creation of an interoperable electronic health record by the VA and Department of Defense to provide a seamless transition from active duty to veteran status.

Along with any of these policy fixes, the onus remains on us as a community. We must continue to protect each other from an enemy more vexing than an insurgency, as we were trained to do in uniform. To do this we must ensure that those who are struggling seek professional care, and then ensure that seeking care does not come with a social stigma that may hurt veterans looking for work.

It's an enormous task, but one that each of us can confront in meaningful ways.

Several months ago, a fellow veteran and long-time friend texted me, "Are you in the area? I'm losing it. … I'm just worried about myself and don't trust being alone."

I got in my truck and headed over.

I refuse to again be left with nothing but questions. Our leaders must refuse the same.

Garrett Berntsen served five years in the Army with the 82nd Airborne Division and deployed twice to Kandahar, Afghanistan. Berntsen is an IAVA Leadership Fellow and is currently pursuing a masters degree at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies while working at the Center for International and Strategic Studies. His email is

To respond to this commentary, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Time to stop dumping on the VA

    Time to stop dumping on the VA

    Kudos to Veterans Administration Secretary Robert A. McDonald for attempting to give VA medicine a good name ("VA is critical to medicine and vets," Oct. 24). The vast majority of your readers are probably unaware of the accomplishments he catalogs. He mentioned the electronic medical record (EMR)....

  • VA secretary misses the point in defense of his agency

    VA secretary misses the point in defense of his agency

    Secretary Robert McDonald of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs defends his department against critics by reciting the VA's proud history of care to veterans and technological innovation ("VA is critical to medicine and vets," October 23).

  • VA Maryland Health Care System is ready to help

    VA Maryland Health Care System is ready to help

    On Veterans Day we salute and honor the men and women who have served in the United States armed forces. It's a day we reflect on the contributions and sacrifices of service members and their families and demonstrate that our gratitude toward veterans is more than mere words.

  • VA saved my dad's sight [Letter]

    I've been wanting to write a thank-you note to the Veterans Health Administration. My father is a veteran and has macular degeneration he has been treated at the VA for over five years. Without all the care, he would be blind by now. So my blue-eyed dad still can drive and take care of his lawn...

  • The VA's dysfunction is driven by a 'culture of fear'

    The VA's dysfunction is driven by a 'culture of fear'

    I read with interest Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert A. McDonald's recent commentary about the truly remarkable accomplishments of top-notch health care professionals affiliated with the Veterans Healthcare Administration ("VA is critical to medicine and vets," Oct. 23).

  • Thanks to all at Baltimore VA Hospital Center [Letter]

    Thanks to all at Baltimore VA Hospital Center [Letter]

    In light of all the negative press that the Veterans Administration's health care system has received, I want to send my sincere thanks and gratitude to the Baltimore VA Hospital Center.

  • VA should not be rewarded [Letter]

    VA should not be rewarded [Letter]

    What a message these so-called lawmakers are sending to government workers by authorizing billions of dollars more to the Department of Veterans Affairs ("Veterans vent about poor VA medical care," July 29).

  • Reduce VA wait times in Md. [Letter]

    Reduce VA wait times in Md. [Letter]

    Throughout my decades in public office, I have always viewed our service to U.S. veterans and their families not only as a top priority but as an obligation. So I was disheartened, to say the least, to learn that veterans here in Maryland are waiting an average of 80 days before seeing a primary...