Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionOp-Eds

Gansler's gaffe: Unwise, but not worthy of an apology

ElectionsAnthony BrownExecutive BranchDouglas F. GanslerRichard Nixon

An ugly fight unfolded last week between gubernatorial aspirants Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown and Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler regarding their campaign rhetoric.

Mr. Gansler was surreptitiously recorded saying, "I mean, right now [Mr. Brown's] campaign slogan is, 'Vote for me, I want to be the first African American governor of Maryland.' ... That's a laudable goal, but you need a second sentence: 'Because here's what I've done, and here's why I've done it.'"

The Brown camp and other Democratic bigwigs are appalled: According to The Washington Post, which broke the story, Brown campaign manager Justin Schall stated that Mr. Gansler is "out of touch with Maryland's values," and to ensure that there was no lack of overreaction, Brown supporter Montgomery County Council member Valerie Ervin actually said, "White people don't like the race card being pulled on them, and he pulled the race card on Anthony."

Not to be outdone in irresponsible rhetoric, Gansler aide Doug Thornell argued "It's unfortunate that Anthony Brown's campaign has to stoop to the level of Richard Nixon and send in spies to illegally record a private campaign organizing meeting."

(It's a curious issue about which for Democrats to be enraged, since they seem to have honed a talent for secret recording pretty well in the 2012 presidential race.)

Let a conservative who is leaning toward supporting Republican David Craig for governor adjudicate this one: Doug Gansler is raising a legitimate issue when he argues that Anthony Brown cites the importance of his race and the possibility of Maryland electing the first African-American governor while avoiding other issues. That said, it is unwise political rhetoric, as the Democratic constituency resents such talk.

It is quite justifiable to attack one's primary opponent on his choice of issue agenda, but that does not mean it is politically effective, and in this case it is likely a campaign miscalculation by Mr. Gansler to bring up Mr. Brown's race at all.

It is also quite within acceptable campaigning conventions to ask what are an opponent's issue priorities and what he or she has accomplished. It seems that Mr. Gansler was not disparaging Mr. Brown racially whatsoever, so this corner sustains his refusal to apologize.

Some Democrats are bringing up the fact that Mr. Gansler is Jewish, suggesting that he is surely counting on Jewish votes just as Mr. Brown is counting on African American votes. But unless Mr. Gansler brought this up himself as a selling point, it is close to anti-Semitic to do so.

Overall: Mr. Gansler has not crossed a line from reasonable campaigning, although he may have hurt himself in the contest since his Democratic brethren don't like his criticizing Mr. Brown.

Let me state the obvious: You cannot run a campaign without implying that you are a better candidate than your opponent and/or saying he or she has not made the case for his or her candidacy. People who resent such campaigning in primaries simply resent the fact of primary challenges.

Let's stick to issues, gentlemen: engage the question of how your governorship will be better or at least different from Gov. Martin O'Malley's. That is not unreasonable advice for both of these candidates.

Richard E. Vatz teaches persuasion at Towson University and is the author of The Only Authentic Book of Persuasion (Kendall Hunt, 2013). A version of this article appeared on the blog Red Maryland.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
ElectionsAnthony BrownExecutive BranchDouglas F. GanslerRichard Nixon
  • Polls are not in public interest
    Polls are not in public interest

    Mileah Kromer discusses the reasons that the results of pre-election polls concerning the race for governor were largely incorrect, particularly the timing of the polls on which media and the campaigns relied ("Hogan and Brown: tortoise and hare?" Nov. 12). I do not doubt that she is largely...

  • Purple Maryland
    Purple Maryland

    It's safe to say the election is over, and we are all anxious to see what "color" our state will be. Are we now red with a base of blue or still blue with a splash of red ("Republican sees spending as key for governor-elect," Nov. 14)?

  • Race played no role in Hogan win
    Race played no role in Hogan win

    I read Thomas Schaller's column ("Race had a role in Hogan's win," Nov. 11) regarding Larry Hogan's win over Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown in the 2014 Maryland gubernatorial election. He basically states that the areas Mr. Hogan won had more white people then black.

  • Reader to The Sun: Hogan won, get used to it
    Reader to The Sun: Hogan won, get used to it

    I agree with letter writer David Byran that Governor-elect Larry Hogan has done Maryland and the entire country a great service ("Good riddance to "O'Malley," Oct. 10).

  • Is Hogan inevitable in 2018?
    Is Hogan inevitable in 2018?

    I couldn't decide whether I was more amused or bemused by Richard J. Cross III's op-ed about the possible Democratic candidates for governor four years from now ("Who will challenge Hogan in 2018?" Nov. 15).

  • Enough with the talk of race in analyzing elections
    Enough with the talk of race in analyzing elections

    Race, racism, racist. I am so tired of hearing these words whenever a candidate loses or a policy is defeated ("Race had a role in Hogan's win," Nov. 11). Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown lost to Larry Hogan because Mr. Brown ran one of the worst campaigns in recent Maryland elections. He even...

Comments
Loading