Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Op-Eds

The folly of Craig's stormwater fee repeal

I listened with curiosity to Harford County Executive (and Republican gubernatorial candidate) David Craig's broadside against clean water this week. I realize that as we close in on Maryland's 2014 election, campaign fodder often overtakes serious debate, but even so I was surprised at his rant against county stormwater legislation that he himself introduced and then signed into law.

Polluted runoff is a serious problem. In Anne Arundel County, it is responsible for a blanket advisory from our health department warning our residents against water contact within 48 hours after a rainfall. Just this past summer, several of our community beaches were closed because of high bacteria levels.

Many of our communities depend on clean water for recreation and quality of life, and our maritime industry and commercial watermen depend on it to make a living. Furthermore, rushing stormwater erodes stream banks, which threatens bridges, roads and other public infrastructure, and localized stormwater flooding can damage private property — it has even caused some of my constituents' flood insurance to go up.

This is not a problem we can choose to ignore.

The state law requiring our largest jurisdictions to implement fees to reduce polluted runoff deliberately gave these local jurisdictions the flexibility to set up their programs to meet their individual needs. There is no prescription for the amount of the fee, the assessment mechanism, or other details — that is all left to the local government to decide. Isn't this the exact opposite of the "one size fits all" policies that we often hear Mr. Craig and many other politicians criticize?

Giving counties control of their stormwater programs means they will also control the money — where it is spent and how it is tracked. Local governments have dedicated funds, such as for water/sewer service or trash collection, where the revenue and expenses can be tracked independently of the general fund. This makes it much easier to oversee the program and ensure the money goes where it is supposed to, that it is invested back into our local communities in the form of projects and jobs.

Instead of concerning himself with Texas Gov. Rick Perry's absurd ad campaign inviting Maryland businesses to the Lone Star State, maybe Mr. Craig should look inward and use his power as county executive to help promote the many jobs — in design, engineering, and construction — that will be created as a result of investing in projects and programs to reduce polluted runoff. That's what we're doing in Anne Arundel County, where a recent economic impact study by the University of Maryland showed that a local stormwater program will support thousands of jobs throughout the county and will help usher in new and vibrant economies based on protecting our natural resources. The study demonstrates that investing in our local environment will in fact keep the jobs here rather than moving them somewhere else.

Earlier this year, the Anne Arundel County Council passed bipartisan legislation creating a stormwater fee, after countless hours of thoughtful consideration and good debate. We have a reasonable cap on commercial property fees, give reduced rates to non-profit properties, give credits and other rebates for existing management practices, and allow a hardship exemption for low income families. It isn't perfect, but it is a responsible way to tackle our county's obligation to provide safe and clean water for our citizens. If Mr. Craig doesn't like his Harford County stormwater bill anymore, he is welcome to copy ours — he can find all the details on our county website.

Chris Trumbauer, a Democrat, represents District 6 on the Anne Arundel County Council. His email is ctrumbauer@aacounty.org.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Rain tax: Noble goal, unfair execution
    Rain tax: Noble goal, unfair execution

    Kim Coble of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation laments that Maryland county officials are considering rolling back their stormwater remediation fees. ("'Rain tax¿ is rolling back," Jan. 26.) In 2012 the Maryland General Assembly passed HB 987 requiring nine Maryland counties and Baltimore...

  • Rain tax proponents are missing the larger issue
    Rain tax proponents are missing the larger issue

    In her letter to the editor ("The stormwater fee and the will of the voters," March 12), Katherine W. Rylaarsdam has bought into the protecting-the-environment argument too strongly and is ignoring the larger issue.

  • Rubbed the wrong way by the rain tax
    Rubbed the wrong way by the rain tax

    Commentator Mileah Kromer makes it clear that her polls indicate people are dubious of whether stormwater runoff contributes to pollution in the Chesapeake Bay ("The rub of the 'rain tax,'" March 8).

  • The rain tax is unfair because not all pay it
    The rain tax is unfair because not all pay it

    I'm for the stormwater management fee if it is paid by all ("End 'rain tax' ridicule rap, repeal and replace law," Feb. 28). It is ridiculous to tie it some counties and not all. In the state of current dynamics, just about all contribute to the problems, and just about all will benefit from...

  • We all must assume responsibility for the bay
    We all must assume responsibility for the bay

    I think Dan Rodricks' suggestion for a new flush tax is a promising alternative to the storm water management fee —one that would hold us all personally responsible for the health of the Chesapeake Bay ("End 'rain tax' ridicule rap, repeal and replace law," Feb. 28).

  • The voters wanted the 'rain tax' repeal
    The voters wanted the 'rain tax' repeal

    I cannot believe that The House Environment and Transportation Committee voted 14-7 to kill the bill to repeal the "rain tax" ("House panel kills Hogan's stormwater fee repeal," March 6). This was one of Gov. Larry Hogan's platform issues about reducing taxes that helped get him elected, and...

  • The stormwater fee and the will of the voters
    The stormwater fee and the will of the voters

    The House Environment and Transportation Committee rejected Gov. Larry Hogan's proposed repeal of the stormwater management fee ("House panel kills Hogan's stormwater fee repeal," March 6). Proponents of repeal, predictably enough, are complaining that the voters "spoke" last November.

  • Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]
    Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

    In response to your paper's recent article about churches paying stormwater fees, I would point out that churches provide heavily discounted space for community groups and that many house affordable kindergarten and nursery school programs and provide food and shelter for at-risk populations...

Comments
Loading