Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Op-Eds
News Opinion Op-Eds

Put transportation in voters' hands

For almost a decade, the Maryland business community has urged the legislature to raise revenue to invest in our state's clogged transportation infrastructure.

And for good reason. The Baltimore area is the fifth most traffic-congested in America — and the Washington area is No. 1. As nations like China build high-speed rail and cities from Portland to Dallas expand light rail, Maryland continues to fall behind even in repairing potholes and bridges.

Building the Red Line in Baltimore, the Purple Line in the D.C. suburbs, and the kind of MARC commuter rail Maryland needs remain aspirations, not financed projects.

The need is clear. But the strategy to meet it is stuck in the 1970s. That's when Maryland took the progressive step of combining its highway and transit agencies into one department. Gas taxes, car registrations and transit fares all went into one account used to invest in transportation improvements. As more money was needed, the legislature would raise it, using the opportunity to informally ratify priorities.

I came to the House of Delegates in 1987. That was the year we raised the gas tax to fund expansion of I-270, build Baltimore's light rail and extend Metrorail to Greenbelt. Again, in 1992, we passed a big transportation revenue package, leaving the details of project selection to informal negotiations between legislators and the governor.

But that was the last increase in the gas tax and the last big transportation package. Twenty years ago.

Since then, the General Assembly has passed small programs — to build the Intercounty Connector with tolls and to keep up with highway repairs and transit planning. But these have fallen far short of the need. The result has been world-class traffic congestion, which irritates citizens and retards economic growth.

For the last few years, Senate PresidentThomas V. Mike Millerhas championed legislation to raise the gas tax. It has failed because oil prices have risen and public trust in government priorities has fallen. This year, it failed again because most legislators were convinced — rightly — that most voters won't support a gas tax increase to pay for transportation investments they are only vaguely aware of. Such an increase is unlikely to be taken up in a special session.

What is to be done?

We need a new, more transparent strategy for transportation investment. Unlike Maryland, many states fund major transportation projects from bonds authorized in voter referendums. The state's leadership draws up a plan and asks the voters to approve it.

The revenue sources may be the gas tax — or sales tax, property tax, or other revenue. The key is that the revenue is tied to specific projects, and the voters — not the politicians and bureaucrats — get to decide if the benefits are worth the costs. In just the last three years, in the midst of the Great Recession and rising gas prices, voters in 18 states have passed 74 transportation investment programs.

Maryland can learn something from them. After 20 years of waiting for the politicians to decide the time is right to raise revenue for transportation, it time to put the issue to the citizens. Unfortunately, under Maryland's constitution, putting this challenge to the people is easier said than done. It will require a constitutional amendment allowing the governor and the legislature to call a referendum on a transportation investment program.

But that's no reason not to do it. Five years ago, the legislature proposed a constitutional amendment to let the people decide on legalizing slots gambling in Maryland, and they approved it.

The first step would be for the legislature to propose a constitutional amendment to authorize a referendum on a major traffic-busting transportation plan. We could do it in a special session this year and put in on this November's ballot. Or we could wait until next year and propose it for Election Day 2014.

If it is approved, the governor and legislative leaders should convene a group, including private-sector representatives, to draw up a plan to put to the voters. It should be both bold enough to inspire confidence that it will a game-changer, reducing traffic congestion and driving smart growth, and practical enough that voters can understand why the benefits are worth the costs.

Our current transportation funding model has clearly failed to keep pace with our economic needs. It's time for a new approach: Asking our people to make the big choices.

Sen. Jim Rosapepe, a College Park Democrat, represents Prince George's and Anne Arundel counties in the Maryland Senate. His email is jim.rosapepe@senate.state.md.us.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The offal truth

    The offal truth

    On Friday afternoon, my neighbor reported a dead deer in front of his house to Baltimore County animal control. On Saturday night, the deer having not been picked up, I contacted them again. By Monday morning, the deer, being completely disgusting and mostly eaten by flies, vultures and foxes,...

  • No major tax rollbacks?

    No major tax rollbacks?

    Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller told some reporters this week what most State House observers have long suspected — we should not expect some sweeping reduction in taxes during the upcoming legislative session. He also produced a spirited defense of the tax increases approved during Gov....

  • Tax breaks are divisive

    Tax breaks are divisive

    The commentary opposing the proposed tax breaks for corporate donations that help pay for private school tuition by Sara Love of the ACLU of Maryland strikes me as another example of how our new governor acts to ensure his re-election in four years by picking "winners" with his politically-motivated...

  • Rodricks is wrong: Md. tax system is progressive and fair

    Rodricks is wrong: Md. tax system is progressive and fair

    As usual Dan Rodricks gets it wrong. The Maryland tax structure is both progressive and fair ("Beyond race, building a movement for economic fairness," March 30). Let's look at two families A and B. Family A earns $60,000 and B $300,000. For 2014, excluding exemptions and deductions, A pays $2,800...

  • Md. can't keep robbing Peter to pay Paul

    Md. can't keep robbing Peter to pay Paul

    While I applaud the hard work on the state budget put in by House Appropriations Committee Chair Del. Maggie McIntosh and others, I am a little alarmed at their consistent kowtowing to the unions and their annual demands for increased funds despite reports of irresponsible spending.

  • Congress must create a level playing field for bricks-and-mortar businesses and online vendors

    Congress must create a level playing field for bricks-and-mortar businesses and online vendors

    During the next few weeks Congress will have the opportunity to pass e-fairness legislation, which will update our sales tax system and restore fairness to small businesses in our community.

  • Why isn't there enough money to sustain the governor's promised tax cuts?

    Why isn't there enough money to sustain the governor's promised tax cuts?

    Regarding your recent editorial criticizing Gov. Larry Hogan for submitting cuts in education funding, I am among the majority of Marylanders who favored Mr. Hogan in the last election because we supported his proposed budget cuts and call for fiscal responsibility and accountability ("Hogan, Busch...

  • Md. Democrats offer ruinous agenda

    Md. Democrats offer ruinous agenda

    I wonder where the rulers in the Maryland Senate and House of Delegates are going to get the money to fund what Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller described as the Democratic agenda ("Senate panel rewrites Hogan's charter school law," March 26)? I guess they will do what they do every year...

Comments
Loading
79°