Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Op-Eds

A radical redefinition of marriage

God created man in the image of himself, in the image of God he created him, male and female he created them. God blessed them, saying to them, 'Be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth and subdue it.' (Gen. 1:27-28)

These words, the very beginning of the first book of the Bible, given to us in the first book of the Old Testament, have guided society's understanding of the human family in the world's civilizations for millennia. This early and revered reference was the first recognition of this unique human relationship — the only such one capable of bringing life into the world, the only one to offer this singular and necessary gift for the good of society.

Amazingly, those people of faith, as well as others of no faith at all, who recognize the value of preserving this special relationship and who simply want our society to continue to honor it, have been painted throughout a rancorous debate these past two years as "radicals." Yet, I would suggest that it is those who have dared to assume the right to change what God himself has joined who have chosen the radical path for our state and its families.

Fortunately, people of good will in Maryland, a state founded on the belief that everyone can practice his or her faith without government interference, still have this right. They should be able to vote their consciences in November without fear of being labeled "intolerant bigots." Sadly, that is but one of the ugly volleys lobbed by some at those who want simply to protect the institutions of marriage and the family, believing it is what is best for society — not out of some hostility toward our sisters and brothers who are attracted to others of the same sex.

Might we be experiencing, indeed, intolerance behind the mask of "tolerance?"

Ironically, it is the very people crying intolerance who are practicing it. Cardinal Timothy Dolan, president of theU.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, perhaps said it best in defending the Catholic Church against such baseless claims: "We reject all hatred and unjust treatment against any person. Our profound regard for marriage as the complementary and fruitful union of a man and a woman does not negate our concern for the well-being of all people but reinforces it."

This effort has proved ugly on many fronts. Extraordinary and probably unprecedented political pressures and legislative maneuvers by Gov. Martin O'Malleyand party leadership led the House of Delegates to pass the measure, but barely. And the Maryland Senate rushed through deliberations on the bill that will alter the fundamental meaning of a relationship thousands of years old in a mere 48 hours. By hastily passing this legislation, the Maryland General Assembly and our governor, who plans to sign the bill today, have left the people of Maryland no choice but to undo this draconian dictate. It is our firm belief that they will join voters in 31 other states where this issue has gone to a statewide ballot by emphatically voting in November to restore Maryland's law recognizing marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Many legislators are to be commended for having the courage to withstand those hard-fisted pressures, and deserve thanks and praise for standing strong in support of marriage as we have known it to be throughout history and across faiths and cultures.

Some may suggest that our society's traditional understanding of marriage has already unraveled and that redefining marriage won't harm it any further. But this radical redefinition of marriage will irreparably undermine the irreplaceable role that both a mother and father play in the life of a child and relegate their relationship to an arbitrary status among many other family arrangements.

As the Catholic Church joins with so many others its efforts to returning our law to a proper recognition of marriage, we commit ourselves to advocating for the truth in a manner that is respectful, compassionate and worthy of the love our God calls us to bring to all our brothers and sisters.

That truth, deeply embedded in our faith, cannot be dismissed as an imposition of a religious belief on others of differing faiths. It is a truth that both faith and reason have placed before us, and that encompasses a universal recognition about our human experience. To put it simply, from the very beginning of time until now, no human being has ever existed without the agency of a mother and a father.

Assigning the label of "marriage" to any relationship between two people forces all of society to forgo our most basic understanding of the natural origins of the family. No matter how sympathetic the claims of the proponents of redefining marriage may seem, they mask a fact that cannot be denied about the true nature of marriage.

It is my prayer that the people of Maryland will recognize this truth in their hearts when they go to the voting booth in November.

Cardinal Edwin F. O'Brien is apostolic administrator of the Archdiocese of Baltimore. His email is

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Marriage equality can't wait

    Marriage equality can't wait

    In 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage in Loving v. Virginia, there was not a single dissent. Never mind that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute had been in the books since 1924. The justices unanimously found discrimination in the institution of marriage...

  • How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    As a long-time civics teacher I follow the Supreme Court's decisions very carefully. I have long admired Justice Anthony Kennedy because he is the swing vote on the court and his decisions are often unpredictable.

  • Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Our view: Same-sex marriage is set to be legal in a majority of states, making eventual Supreme Court victory appear inevitable

  • Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    A recent suggestion that some people should be exempt from serving gays because of their religious beliefs is nonsense. If you are licensed to provide a service or employed by the government to do so, you are required to perform that service without unlawful discrimination. Neither government employment...

  • Equality in Alabama

    Equality in Alabama

    These are heady days for advocates of marriage equality. The Supreme Court is due to hear arguments this spring in a group of cases that could settle the question of a national Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, and this week, a decision not to enter a stay on the enforcement of a federal...

  • Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    In his recent column ("The conservative case for same-sex marriage," March 29), Eddie Zipperer gives three reasons why conservatives should favor same sex marriage. I find his second, poking fun at the Bible, to be both offensive and ignorant.

  • Get states out of the marriage business

    Get states out of the marriage business

    In light of the recent Supreme Court on same sex marriage being protected under the Constitution ("Freedom to marry," June 27), there is now a movement afoot in Montana by a Mormon, Nathan Collier, who is legally married to Vicki, to be allowed to marry his second wife, Christine. Many have predicted...

  • Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Letter writer Adam Goldfinger objected to Eddie Zipperer's references to Leviticus and states that he does indeed try to follow the laws in this book ("Yes, some people do follow the bible to the letter," April 3). I find myself wondering how many people Mr. Goldfinger has personally stoned to...