Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Op-Eds

Making elections fair

Election fraud strikes at the heart of our political system and threatens our freedom. When fraudulent votes cancel out legal votes, our rights as citizens are diminished. Free and fair elections are our American birthright, and citizen initiatives to safeguard voter integrity are a welcome development, supporting and supplementing the work of boards of elections across the country.

In a state such as Maryland, where voter ID is not required, the administration of polls is critical to the success of an election that is free of irregularities. This is the goal of Election Integrity Maryland (EIM).

What is an irregularity? It can be a clerical or mechanical error. It can also be a misunderstanding or an intentional misrepresentation.

Added to this, the antiquated voter rolls of many states add a layer of uncertainty and leave the door at least partially open for the possibility of voter fraud. In February, The Pew Center on the States issued a report, "Inaccurate, Costly and Inefficient," stating: "Approximately 24 million voter registrations in the United States — one of every eight — are no longer valid or have significant inaccuracies ... Nearly 2 million deceased individuals are listed as voters. Approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state. About 12 million records have incorrect addresses ..."

Poll watchers and challengers are an integral part of the Maryland election system and the laws that govern it and provide an added level of protection against irregularities at the polls.

Election Integrity Maryland created our training strictly following the regulations outlined by the Maryland State Board of Elections. In fact, our training guide was reviewed and approved by the board.

Our poll watchers are trained in a two-hour webinar; there is no pre-screening of registrants. We invite volunteers statewide to undergo the training and receive a "diploma" demonstrating they have completed their training and are prepared to serve in the polls.

EIM is nonpartisan. Once trained, our volunteers are encouraged to contact candidates, central committees or interest groups (e.g., parties on either side of the various referendums that will be present on the upcoming ballot) of their choice to volunteer to represent their interest in polling locations throughout the state. In essence, our trained poll watchers become the eyes and ears of the candidates, central committees or interest groups.

In contrast to what some have asserted, our volunteers are not focusing on largely minority precincts. On the day of the general election, poll watchers will be on hand mostly in their own precincts or districts, whether minority precincts or otherwise.

Volunteer poll watchers have just one item on their job description: observation. Poll watchers are not allowed to interact with voters. They are limited to speaking only with chief judges. They will take notes if they see something that appears out of the ordinary; note zero counts on the voting machines before voting commences; observe the placement of tamper tape at the end of the day; and note if anyone who requires assistance in voting does not receive it (or if a poll worker provides "too much" assistance).

No one in Maryland is prevented from voting. If someone is mistakenly omitted from the voter rolls, the voter is offered a provisional ballot and the Board of Elections will straighten out the confusion at the close of the election. If someone shows up at the wrong location, he or she will be instructed where their correct voting location is.

The goal of Election Integrity Maryland is to be a "help mate" of the election process in Maryland. We are not adversaries. While EIM is modeled after the True the Vote initiative begun in Houston in 2010, EIM has no official relationship with True the Vote. EIM is a nonprofit, 501(c) 4 corporation.

The Board of Elections, Election Integrity Maryland, True the Vote and the American people all want the same thing: an election where the outcome is not suspected of being manipulated by any person, party or special-interest group.

Cathy Kelleher is president of Election Integrity Maryland. Her email is

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Requiring tests for voting? Seriously?

    Requiring tests for voting? Seriously?

    Letter writer Lyle Rescott not only wants to restore literacy tests on prospective voters but even suggested civics questions ("Voter registration should come with a test," June 13). So I have one for him, which is whether he is aware of the abusive history of literacy tests in the Jim Crow South...

  • Make voting an inalienable right

    Make voting an inalienable right

    Voting should be an inalienable right. If it is not, if there is any way to deprive citizens of their vote, it opens the door to systematic disenfranchisement of targeted groups for political purposes. That's why poll tax laws and voter test laws and property requirements have been discarded.

  • Voter registration is not the problem

    Voter registration is not the problem

    Even if we do set up an automatic voter registration, do you honestly think people who are too lazy or disinterested to register will actually take the time to go out and vote ("How about voter equality?" June 8)? Is this really the problem? Too difficult to register? Not enough people registered?

  • Voter registration should come with a test

    Voter registration should come with a test

    I agree that there should be automatic voter registration ("How about voter equality?" June 8) with two caveats: Voter ID must be presented at poll and potential voters must pass a civics test to have their votes counted. The test might require getting four out of five correct and questions might...

  • An election system ripe for abuse

    An election system ripe for abuse

    Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton champions automatic voter registration for all 18-year-olds, ending voter ID laws and keeping the polls open for 20 days of early voting — and The Sun agrees with her in the name of equity ("How about voter equality?" June 8).

  • Illegal immigration's impact on voting

    Illegal immigration's impact on voting

    Many of us consider the issue of voter inequality a contrived one conveniently politicized by the Democratic candidates during election cycles. The Sun's editorial board, as usual, shows how it idolizes the Clintons by failing to address areas of voter inequality caused by illegal immigration (...

  • Voter ID should be bipartisan goal

    Voter ID should be bipartisan goal

    I think it is way past the time to enact legislation to require a federal ID system because I never know if my vote in Maryland can be compromised by someone who is not a citizen ("Messing with voting rights in Texas," Oct. 21).

  • Forget ID, make voters pass a quiz

    Forget ID, make voters pass a quiz

    Rather than voter identification, I propose a civics test be given when entering the voting booth ("Messing with voting rights in Texas," Oct. 20). If you don't answer four out of five questions correctly, the voting machine is turned off.