Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99


News Opinion Op-Eds

Don't worry about Baltimore's patent drought

As the economy continues to flounder, many cities are looking for ways to replicate Silicon Valley's financial success. When seeking to catch the magic of those biggest successes — Apple, Google and Facebook — the word "innovation" gets thrown around frequently. And as intellectual property is taking on a larger and larger role in how companies do business in the Bay Area, many have equated innovation with patents.

A recent Sun article about innovation in Baltimore and Maryland focused on just that. It lamented that the Baltimore metro area came in 116th out of 360 metro areas for the number of patent applications per capita, and that the number of patents granted to Baltimoreans remained flat over the past decade. The article seemed to suggest that this lack of intellectual property growth was at least partially responsible for Baltimore's lack of job growth.

While these statistics are important, patent applications simply do not equal innovation. Nor do patents necessarily create jobs. Rather, there are nuances to intellectual property — and specifics about Maryland's research corridor — that give these statistics some color.

First, it's important to understand which inventions merit a patent. By and large, there are only three requirements: that the invention is new, useful and nonobvious. These are relatively low bars. The invention doesn't have to be better than what's currently on the market. It doesn't have to appeal to consumers. And it doesn't have to be a significant invention at all. In fact, "worthless patents" (like a patent entitled "Method of Exercising a Cat" using a laser pointer) are well documented. Patents are simply tools to recoup an inventor's cost of developing an invention. They are not necessarily rewards on "innovation."

Second, it's also important to understand what a patent is. A patent is simply a legal right to prevent others from practicing an invention. It is not a right to make a particular product; the inventor had that right whether he applied for a patent or not. Nor is there a requirement that the inventor make her own invention. Indeed, many inventors have sold their patents to companies that do absolutely nothing except file lawsuits against other innovators in the hope of collecting money from settlements or court judgments. These "patent trolls" are the single most serious threat to innovation today, costing the U.S. economy $50 billion to $500 billion a year — all without making a single innovative product.

Third, the number of patents per invention varies widely across industries. In the high-tech space, one big invention, like the iPhone, is covered by at least 200 patents, and likely closer to 400. But in the biotech and pharmaceutical world, one invention, like a new drug, is often only covered by a single patent. This point is critical for Baltimore and Maryland because biotech and the life sciences — not social networking apps — are what the Baltimore-Washington corridor does best. The Johns Hopkins University, the National Institutes of Health, and the University of Maryland, at College Park, Baltimore County, and the Biotechnology Institute (as well as these institutions' various spin-offs) are all focused significantly on life sciences. One should therefore expect Baltimore and Maryland to have substantially fewer patent applications than, say, California.

Patents, alone, don't create an innovation economy. Rather, they're a product of it. An economy of innovators will produce patents because some of those innovators will need to recoup their costs of research by licensing their inventions and preventing others from copying them. But getting to that innovation economy in the first place requires an ecosystem of innovators: young, hungry inventors, senior but not jaded management, liquid private financing, a regulatory scheme friendly to product deployment, and a culture that focuses on getting deals done quickly. This is all famously harder in the life sciences. Inventors are typically PhDs in their 30s or 40s, not straight-out-of-college hotshots looking to be millionaires overnight. Management is often jaded by the FDA regulatory process, which in turn puts a strong damper on product deployment. Private investing in the life sciences has famously dried up. And deals usually come complete with armies of big-law-firm lawyers, rather than over a handshake.

Nevertheless, basic life science research is a huge job creator. One study from the University of Georgia has estimated that every job created in the life sciences spawns two jobs in other industries. These jobs span the gamut, from high-profile executive positions to research scientists to salespeople to office workers to factory employees. And unlike jobs in the high-tech industry, these jobs tend to be sticky. People don't work their way into the pharmaceutical and biotech industries hoping to get rich quick and move on the next "cool" thing.

Baltimore and Maryland should therefore continue to do — and do much more of — what they already do best: basic scientific and biological research. This is the kind of innovation Baltimore needs, with or without patents.

Jacob S. Sherkow is a fellow at Stanford Law School's Center for Law and the Biosciences. His email is

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Immigrant soldiers won the U.S. Civil War

    Immigrant soldiers won the U.S. Civil War

    In the summer of 1861, an American diplomat in Turin, Italy, looked out the window of the U.S. legation to see hundreds of young men forming a sprawling line. Some wore red shirts, emblematic of the Garibaldini known for pointing one finger in the air and shouting l'Italia Unità! (Italy United!)....

  • Baltimore's homeless: out of sight, out of mind?

    Baltimore's homeless: out of sight, out of mind?

    On a recent morning, the city of Baltimore once again tried to shut the poor out of our minds and drive them from the mainstream of our society — in this case, from the verge of Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, where homeless folks were taking refuge from the elements and finding comfort in a...

  • Life lessons in 'Inside Out'

    Life lessons in 'Inside Out'

    My eight-year-old daughter, Anne, and I had a wonderful time viewing the new Disney/Pixar film "Inside Out." As many parents of a young children know by now, the film tells the story of Riley Andersen, a girl who moves from Minnesota to San Francisco and must cope with the transition to a new home,...

  • Reinventing Baltimore's schools

    Reinventing Baltimore's schools

    In 2000, Don Hutchinson, then president of the Greater Baltimore Committee, was part of a group of Baltimore's business leaders asked to review and critique the city school system's master plan, an annually updated document.

  • Republicans still beating a dead horse on Obamacare

    Republicans still beating a dead horse on Obamacare

    The Supreme Court's decisive 6-3 vote confirming the right of all Americans to federally supported health-care insurance should end the Republican Party's losing war on Obamacare — but it probably won't.

  • New assault reporting law should improve prevention

    New assault reporting law should improve prevention

    Marylanders will soon have a better idea of the extent of the problem of sexual assault in our institutions of higher education — as well as what our institutions are doing to respond. Thanks to House Bill 571, which goes into effect Wednesday, all Maryland colleges and universities must survey...