Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionOp-Eds

Habitat loss threatens bay creatures' survival

ConservationMalariaLand Resources

A little osprey chick has been the center of attention for a growing crowd of admirers this summer. It's the third chick to hatch to a pair of osprey, Tom and Audrey, who make their home on a nesting platform at the end of a dock on Kent Island. It's an osprey home like many others, with one exception: It has a hi-def video camera attached. So Tom and Audrey's busy nest-hold is being beamed out to the world via http://www.chesapeakeconservancy.org, a real reality TV show. Thousands of folks check in daily to see whether Tom has brought home the fish, whether Audrey is tending the nest, and — maybe most of all — whether that little chick will survive to fly away.

It's been a lesson to us all. Nature has its own rules, and for osprey they read like this: The first-born chick dominates. It gets the food first, grows bigger and picks on its younger nest mates. If the parents can't find enough fish, then the youngest chick won't get enough to eat and may die. For a long time late this spring, it looked as if that might happen to the third chick.

To us, it seems cruel, but it's a long-evolved way of balancing population to available resources. Osprey will never over-populate; their numbers won't surpass their habitat's ability to supply food. A balance will be found, but it's a tough lesson for us humans to watch, accustomed as we are to manipulating the world.

As humans, we see the world from our point of view. We give the birds names: Tom and Audrey, and for the chicks Chester, Essie and Ozzie. We feel compassion for them all, want to feed that third chick and want to see this family succeed. But these splendid birds — intelligent and charismatic as they are — aren't people, and we should not step in.

Goodness knows, we already affect their world enough. Consider the many ways in which we humans have disrupted the balance of nature as we crowd the Earth. Here's one example: In 1939, a chemist in Switzerland discovered that DDT, an organochlorine insecticide, could kill potato beetles and many other insects. The compound revolutionized agriculture and saved many lives by killing typhus-carrying lice, and malaria- and yellow fever-carrying mosquitoes. After World War II it was widely distributed, and praised. But then our beloved birds began to rapidly disappear.

By the late 1950s, osprey had become a rare sight, as had bald eagles and peregrine falcons. These top predators ate at the top of the food web, and the DDT they accumulated thinned their eggs' shells. They failed to reproduce, and their populations crashed. Other birds also suffered and numbers declined. Marylander Rachel Carson noticed, and detailed her observations in "Silent Spring" in 1962. In 1972, DDT was banned from general use in the U.S., and many other countries followed suit. Slowly the osprey population, and populations of other birds, recovered.

Though DDT is no longer a threat to these birds, many threats remain, and none is greater than the loss of their habitat, the physical environment they require for survival. The single greatest thing we can do for this osprey family, and their feathered, furry, slithery and leafy green neighbors, is protect the woods, fields and water that sustain them. That won't be easy, as there are millions more people expected to move into the Chesapeake watershed in the next decade. Each one will bring his or her own environmental demands.

However, we can choose to give wild plants and animals the space they need. Whether it be preserving forest integrity throughout the eastern forests where natural gas drilling is now pressing forward, or protecting our river corridors, we can take the right steps. These include strong planning, fully supporting our states' land conservation funding, applauding landowners who see the wisdom in putting conservation easements on their properties, and working with our local land trusts and conservation groups.

Conserved lands cleanse the air, purify water, provide habitat and give us all healthy outdoor recreation space. Saving high-quality open space is the best way we can help Tom and Audrey raise their brood, and future broods, and in the long run it's the best we can do for ourselves, as well.

Joel Dunn is executive director of the Chesapeake Conservancy, a nonprofit that conserves landscapes along the Chesapeake Bay's great rivers. This article is distributed by Bay Journal News Service.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
ConservationMalariaLand Resources
  • Fix the Conowingo before another Hurricane Agnes hits [Letter]
    Fix the Conowingo before another Hurricane Agnes hits [Letter]

    I read with interest commentator Anirban Basu's article touting what a great asset the Conowingo dam is and how it enhances the lives of all Marylanders ("Support the dam to support Md.," Oct. 13).

  • How about aerators to clean up the bay?
    How about aerators to clean up the bay?

    I just read the article about dredging the Susquehanna River, and I couldn't help thinking back to the Seoul Olympics where they used aerators to clean up their filthy water and they got it clean enough that all of the rowing events were held in very safe water ("Study: Dredging little help...

  • Damming the bay's pollution
    Damming the bay's pollution

    Here's the gist of the recent report by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on the Conowingo Dam: Don't confuse a red herring with a red tide. The notion that all the pollution woes of the Chesapeake Bay could be heaped on one 86-year-old hydroelectric facility on the Lower Susquehanna River was...

  • All Maryland's waterways deserve protection
    All Maryland's waterways deserve protection

    The Clean Water Act has brought progress to the Chesapeake Bay, but in order to continue the bay on the path to success we must protect all the waterways in Maryland, including the Anacostia River ("Close Clean Water Act loophole," Nov. 12).

  • Support Clean Water Act
    Support Clean Water Act

    On the 42nd anniversary of the Clean Water Act, a new report from Environment America, "Waterways Restored," highlights the success the law has meant for the Anacostia River, taking it from a state of horrific pollution to giving some hope that it will be safe for swimming and fishing in little...

  • Hogan needs to reverse O'Malley's onerous farm rules
    Hogan needs to reverse O'Malley's onerous farm rules

    In what will be seen as one of soon-to-be ex-Gov. Martin O'Malley's parting shots to the incoming Hogan administration, Mr. O'Malley is pushing through new regulations controlling how farmers fertilize their land ("O'Malley rushes to propose new pollution rules," Nov. 15). Never mind the fact...

  • Dam cleanup too costly
    Dam cleanup too costly

    Regarding the recent commentary about the Conowingo Dam ("Maryland can enforce dam cleanup," Nov. 19), Bob Irvin is correct for the most part. However, let's keep in mind that the Conowingo is a man-made obstruction to sediment, leaves and tree logs that Mother Nature really intended to go to...

  • Denying Conowingo permit won't clean bay
    Denying Conowingo permit won't clean bay

    While I understand the concern about accumulated nutrient buildup in the sediment upstream of the Conowingo Dam posing a hazard to the health of the Chesapeake Bay, as an engineer I do not see what the operation of the dam's power station has anything to do with it ("Maryland can enforce dam...

Comments
Loading