Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Op-Eds

News Opinion Op-Eds

U.S. suit against S&P: Bad for business, bad for democracy

The Justice Department is accusing Standard & Poor's of defrauding investors with optimistic ratings of mortgage-backed securities and derivatives prior to the financial crisis. While investors are entitled to answers about those conflicts, compensation and reforms, Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama, by singling out S&P instead of other bond raters, appear to be engaging in political vengeance and put freedom of speech at risk.

In 2011, S&P, Moody's and Fitch were accused by a Senate committee of giving overly rosy ratings on mortgage-backed securities in the years prior to the financial meltdown of 2008 and then contributing to the severity of the crisis by hastily downgrading hundreds of securities after the housing bubble burst.

Notably, S&P alone downgraded U.S. government bonds in August 2011 — causing the president considerable embarrassment at a time when his re-election was far from certain. This downgrade will raise U.S. borrowing costs and ultimately curtail federal spending and the president's progressive agenda when the Federal Reserve deems appropriate to end quantitative easing, which is artificially depressing all interest rates.

When several firms have engaged in unsuitable practices, federal prosecutors often single out one to obtain damages and reforms and then use that settlement to obtain concessions from the others; however, the selection of S&P certainly creates the appearance of political abuse.

By any reasonable measure, U.S. debt and spending have reached an unsustainable level. The tax increases necessary to bring the federal deficit down to a level that would stabilize the national debt as a percentage of GDP would certainly cause a deep recession, similar to conditions in Italy or Spain, and not yield the anticipated revenues. Hence, spending, in particular entitlement spending, must be cut; however, the president has neither admitted this situation nor shown any inclination toward real entitlement reform.

By not downgrading U.S. debt, Moody's and Fitch have demonstrated the same neglect to investors that all three bond rating agencies practiced during the mid-2000s. Now, the Justice Department lets them pass by targeting S&P.

At the heart of the matter is the bond rating agencies' business practice of charging fees to the firms and state and local governments that issue bonds, and financial houses that create derivatives. The resulting conflict of interest encourages overly rosy ratings that lag market assessments of company and government financial health.

The rating agencies have refused to change this business model — they find the present one too lucrative to put their public responsibility above profits — and this requires a legislative solution.

The bond rating agencies have clung to a First Amendment defense, but that has terrible public policy foundations. No individual may rely on free speech to knowingly deceive another for the purpose of financial gain — that is the textbook definition of fraud — and no reasonable assessment of public or investor interests can justify that defense.

Yet, by singling out S&P — the firm that downgraded U.S. government debt — the attorney general and president have failed to acknowledge their own conflict of interest and create the appearance of retribution.

In other areas, for example broadcast news coverage, the administration has pressured networks it believes demonstrate a conservative bias, but it has kept its hands off those demonstrating preferences for its more liberal policies.

By suing S&P, and not Moody's and Fitch, the attorney general and president have failed to exhibit the sovereign restraint necessary to allow the open and fair criticism of the government necessary to sustain American democracy, and they place constitutional protections at grave danger.

Peter Morici is an economist and professor at the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Businessar and a widely published columnist. His email is pmorici@rhsmith.umd.edu. Twitter: @pmorici1.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Flunking civics should no longer be an option
      Flunking civics should no longer be an option

      "Don't know much about history" -- Sam Cooke

    • Income inequality affects us all
      Income inequality affects us all

      By any metric, the United States has one of the highest rates of income inequality of any developed country in the world. Take, for example, Walt Disney Co., where the CEO earned a $43.7 million salary in 2014, but the median worker took home $19,530. But while this problem has existed as far back...

    • Poll: To know fracking is to (not) love it
      Poll: To know fracking is to (not) love it

      As Gov. Larry Hogan considers whether to sign legislation that would put a two-year moratorium on hydraulic fracturing in Maryland, on top of the three-year moratorium that just ended, I'm left wondering if somewhere there is a drilling executive who is convinced that if the public just knew a...

    • Preventing the next death in police custody
      Preventing the next death in police custody

      Growing up in the Cherry Hill neighborhood of Baltimore, there was rarely a week that went by when my parents, Bill and Madeline Murphy, weren't strategizing on how to end racial injustice in my hometown. Police harassment was a frequent complaint of our Cherry Hill friends and neighbors. The current...

    • Martin O'Malley's modern-day know-nothingness
      Martin O'Malley's modern-day know-nothingness

      Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley is thinking about running for president on the Democratic ticket by appealing to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren's populist fans. Ms. Warren is a very bright former Harvard law professor. So it is interesting that Mr. O'Malley thinks the best way to reach...

    • Expanding the transportation conversation

      Transportation is a hot button issue in Baltimore City these days. In fact, it's red hot. At a recent community meeting, residents unloaded on the Maryland Department of Transportation over a proposed plan to restrict parking on the south side of Aliceanna Street during rush hour.

    Comments
    Loading

    46°