Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Op-Eds

How the U.S. hung a potential Iranian ally out to dry

The plight of the organized resistance to the regime in Iran, particularly the violent persecution of the group known as the Mujahedeen e-Khalq (MEK/PMOI), has been one of the great, untold stories in international politics. It is a story of deadly betrayal, broken promises and political expediency. And that's just on the U.S. side.

Over several decades, the group was opposed to the corrupt military dictatorship of the Shah and was instrumental in the revolution that saw the end to monarchy in Iran. It also revealed Iran's 20-year clandestine nuclear weapons program, which prompted the International Atomic Energy Administration's inspection regime and the United Nations Security Council resolutions. And it provided invaluable, actionable intelligence to the coalition forces in Iraq about Tehran's nefarious activities there. It is today dedicated to a secular, democratic and non-nuclear republic in Iran.

None of which is thanks to U.S. encouragement. Quite the opposite.

In 1997, the Clinton administration put the group on the U.S. government's list of "Foreign Terrorist Organizations" as a sop to Iranian clerics who promised nuclear negotiations that never materialized. Since then, the group's members have been in a bizarre, Kafkaesque netherworld where they remain to this day, just as the moment of danger in U.S.-Iran relations reaches its apex. They are people without a country, living in an abandoned U.S. military base near Baghdad, Iraq, awaiting an evacuation they were promised by the U.S. government a decade ago. They are still mercilessly hunted and murdered by Iran: Two massacres during their long internment in Iraq killed and wounded hundreds of MEK/PMOI members, and a deadly rocket strike several months ago shows they remain in lethal harm's way.

"The Mujahedin-E Khalq: Shackled by a Twisted History," a new monograph by Ambassador Lincoln Bloomfield, a former top U.S. arms negotiator and diplomat, attempts to explain this tortured story. Through firsthand interviews with MEK/PMOI members and access to senior U.S. policymakers past and present, Mr. Bloomfield paints a picture of willful ignorance and malign neglect on the part of the U.S. government and the mainstream media that has left a viable U.S. ally sidelined and vulnerable to extermination.

How did America get into such a humanitarian quagmire, one that serves neither its values nor interests in one of the world's most dangerous confrontations?

Mr. Bloomfield offers an elegantly simple answer: laziness. It was easier for the U.S. government to put the group on the terrorist list than to confront Iran about its abuse of dissidents or to demand talks with no strings attached. It was easier for subsequent administrations to kick the can and ignore the oncoming humanitarian catastrophe for the group in Iraq, even as the MEK/PMOI were making brave contributions to U.S. security. It was easier for the media to take the spoon-fed line that the group was not a "viable" opposition group or worse, was a fringe "cult," than to dedicate resources to getting to a more complex truth that challenges the regime's preferred narrative.

Even the belated decision by the U.S. State Department to "delist" the MEK/PMOI from the terrorist list last year was, in effect, an act of laziness. It took a demand by a U.S. federal court, based on its assessment that the group did not meet the congressionally required criteria for the designation, to get the government to move.

Mr. Bloomfield's book raises painful questions about the limits of (and the public's tolerance for) the dark dealings of realpolitik in an age of near total transparency. That the MEK/PMOI was so visibly used as leverage by the U.S. to keep Iran at the negotiating table, and so callously bled of vital intelligence, then left to die in a desert after promises of protection, exposes a cruelty at the heart of U.S. statecraft across administrations both Democratic and Republican. At a minimum, the reality of the MEK/PMOI's plight should send a chill through any other foreign groups considering risking their lives to help the U.S. or to demonstrably share our values.

Mr. Bloomfield's book leaves open the last chapter of the MEK/PMOI's tortured history. At this writing, the group remains huddled in an ill-equipped and unprotected facility in Iraq called, ironically, Camp Liberty.

Mitchell Reiss is president of Washington College in Maryland. He served as director of policy planning staff at the U.S. State Department under Secretary Colin Powell.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • GOP senators do a disservice to the nation and the Constitution
    GOP senators do a disservice to the nation and the Constitution

    Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and the 46 other GOP Senators who took it upon themselves to lecture the Iranian government on the provisions of the U.S. Constitution are themselves in need of some remedial schooling on not only the Constitution but on the basic rules of diplomacy and negotiation...

  • Senators who sent note to Iran should be charged with treason
    Senators who sent note to Iran should be charged with treason

    The Republican senators who sent a letter to Iran warning that any nuclear deal signed by President Obama could easily be voided is just another example of their lack of respect for our president ("The GOP's poison pen note," March 10).

  • Iran can't be trusted
    Iran can't be trusted

    Some of us out here in the real world are actually glad there are 47 senators in Congress who are more concerned with the future safety of our country than with whether the current White House occupant gets his way ("The GOP's poison pen note," March 10).

  • Md.'s senators must stand up to those pushing for war with Iran
    Md.'s senators must stand up to those pushing for war with Iran

    The Sun's editorial ("The GOP's poison pen note," March11) hits all the right notes regarding the absurd "Cotton 47" letter to the Iranian leadership. While the clear intent was to torpedo peace talks with Iran, the only thing these "statesmen" and women damaged was their own reputations and...

  • GOP senators' letter to Iran was necessary
    GOP senators' letter to Iran was necessary

    Contrary to "Letter to Iran is a disgrace" (March 11), the letter to Iranian leaders from 47 GOP senators was not a call to war but part of the delicate negotiations between the P-5 plus 1 nations and Iran. The terms of a final agreement are not yet public, but sufficient information has been...

  • Why Iran distrusts the U.S.
    Why Iran distrusts the U.S.

    In 2013, George Washington University released newly declassified documents that confirmed the CIA was behind the 1953 overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh.

Comments
Loading