Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Op-Eds

Contradictions from the anti-Question 6 campaign

A central message of those leading the campaign against Maryland's same-sex marriage law is that they are not opposed to gays and lesbians or to ensuring their civil rights. But that contention is undermined by the video of a town hall meeting at Manna Bible Baptist Church in Baltimore in which a Randallstown pastor quoted Scripture to say that homosexuality or even condoning homosexuality is "worthy of death." He went on to say that those who vote for Question 6 are "approving these things that are worthy of death."

And that's not all. The minister, Robert J. Anderson of Colonial Baptist Church, said same-sex marriage is the first step toward legalizing prostitution, bestiality, polygamy and incest.

On Thursday, Derek McCoy, the chairman of the Maryland Marriage Alliance, the group spearheading the opposition to Question 6, issued a statement in response to the video, saying, "Throughout this campaign, we have been clear that all people are worthy of dignity and respect and that tolerance and acceptance of gay and lesbian friends and family does not mean that marriage should be redefined. ... Supporting traditional marriage does not make anyone anti-gay."

The trouble is, Mr. McCoy was sitting directly next to Mr. Anderson during his speech. When Mr. Anderson said, "It is not fair to open up a back door that will legalize prostitution," Mr. McCoy muttered approvingly, "How about that, how about that?" When he said, "It is not fair that we open up a back door that will possibly legalize bestiality," Mr. McCoy said, "Sure, sure." When he said, "Those who practice such things are deserving of death," Mr. McCoy lifted his head and solemnly nodded.

In his statement, Mr. McCoy took pains to object to any who would accuse Mr. Anderson of inciting violence against gays or those who support Question 6. Indeed, that surely must not have been his intent. But his belief that not just gay marriage but homosexuality in general is an "abomination" was clear.

Most Marylanders would not agree, including those who are undecided on Question 6. Most Marylanders would have no trouble drawing a line between same-sex marriage and bestiality or incest. Most Marylanders would see no connection between state recognition of the lifelong commitment of two adults and prostitution. And certainly, most Marylanders would not agree that gays are "worthy of death" — even metaphorically.

Instead, most Marylanders know that gays and lesbians are no different from anyone else in almost every respect. That they contribute to society just like anyone else, fall in love like anyone else, and yearn for comfort and stability like anyone else. Most Marylanders long ago concluded that gays and lesbians should not face discrimination.

Certainly, not all of those who oppose Question 6 would agree with Mr. Anderson, and not all would sit and nod at such nonsense like Mr. McCoy did. But the dissonance between that scene and what the Maryland Marriage Alliance says about its belief in tolerance ought to give Maryland voters pause. Those who are trying to decide how to vote on Question 6 should ask whether they believe that marriage equality would lead to legalized bestiality and prostitution. If not, why should they believe all of the other supposedly dire consequences the anti-Question 6 campaign predicts?

Instead, they should consider this question: Do they believe that gays and lesbians deserve to be treated equally under the law? If so, there can only be one answer on Question 6.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Marriage equality can't wait

    Marriage equality can't wait

    In 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage in Loving v. Virginia, there was not a single dissent. Never mind that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute had been in the books since 1924. The justices unanimously found discrimination in the institution of marriage...

  • How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    As a long-time civics teacher I follow the Supreme Court's decisions very carefully. I have long admired Justice Anthony Kennedy because he is the swing vote on the court and his decisions are often unpredictable.

  • Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Our view: Same-sex marriage is set to be legal in a majority of states, making eventual Supreme Court victory appear inevitable

  • Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    A recent suggestion that some people should be exempt from serving gays because of their religious beliefs is nonsense. If you are licensed to provide a service or employed by the government to do so, you are required to perform that service without unlawful discrimination. Neither government employment...

  • Equality in Alabama

    Equality in Alabama

    These are heady days for advocates of marriage equality. The Supreme Court is due to hear arguments this spring in a group of cases that could settle the question of a national Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, and this week, a decision not to enter a stay on the enforcement of a federal...

  • Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    In his recent column ("The conservative case for same-sex marriage," March 29), Eddie Zipperer gives three reasons why conservatives should favor same sex marriage. I find his second, poking fun at the Bible, to be both offensive and ignorant.

  • Get states out of the marriage business

    Get states out of the marriage business

    In light of the recent Supreme Court on same sex marriage being protected under the Constitution ("Freedom to marry," June 27), there is now a movement afoot in Montana by a Mormon, Nathan Collier, who is legally married to Vicki, to be allowed to marry his second wife, Christine. Many have predicted...

  • Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Letter writer Adam Goldfinger objected to Eddie Zipperer's references to Leviticus and states that he does indeed try to follow the laws in this book ("Yes, some people do follow the bible to the letter," April 3). I find myself wondering how many people Mr. Goldfinger has personally stoned to...