Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Op-Eds

News Opinion Op-Eds

Don't export LNG in Maryland

In recent years, the natural gas industry plunged into a reckless gold rush across communities nationwide with dirty, dangerous drilling and "fracking" practices that are exempt from many clean air and water laws. Now the gas profiteers have realized that there's even more money to be made by liquefying the gas and shipping it overseas — and so what if that sends gas prices here at home through the roof?

The proposed Dominion LNG export facility in Calvert County's Cove Point provides a good case study of why this practice is bad for the environment, for people and for our nation's fragile economy.

The problems with gas begin with getting it out of the ground. Companies roll into a town or rural community, set up massive drilling rigs, and then grind through soil, rock and drinking water aquifers to reach the gas deposits. Next comes the hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, where millions of gallons of water mixed with sand, and a potentially toxic cocktail of chemicals, is pumped at high pressure into tiny cracks, breaking up the rock and releasing the gas. Not surprisingly, this violent process is known to contaminate drinking water, release huge amounts of the potent greenhouse gas methane into the air, disrupt life in local communities and create vast cleanup problems.

The proposed Cove Point facility will rely on increased fracking in the Marcellus shale, a gas-rich geologic formation under parts of Maryland, Ohio, New York, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. Intensifying interest in this shale is particularly bad news for Pennsylvania, where already-weak safeguards to protect people's air, water and health just became even less sturdy. A new law forced through the state legislature by pro-drilling lawmakers and industry lobbyists takes away local municipalities' authority to protect their residents and allows drilling companies to start fracking just a football field's length away from their children's schools, the local hospital, or people's backyards.

Once the industry has fracked its gas, sacrificing people's health and drinking water along the way, the industry wants to get that gas to the coast. So brace for an invasion of lawyers with eminent domain orders, followed by an ugly tangle of pipelines punctuated with compressor stations slicing across fields and streams. And yes, the pipelines will leak methane and rupture, further polluting the water and air.

The final step before sending the product abroad is the dirty and energy-intensive method of turning the gas into liquid. To create liquefied natural gas (LNG), the gas must to undergo a massive super-cooling process, which is exactly what Maryland's proposed Cove Point facility would be designed to do. But most people don't realize that the enormous amount of energy this process requires makes LNG's overall greenhouse gas pollution similar to that of coal. So much for the argument that natural gas is a "clean" alternative to coal-burning power plants.

Maryland has made great progress in its fight to shut down dirty, coal-fired plants and protect the health of its communities. Allowing an LNG export facility to come online would knock the state two steps back.

Ultimately, the only safe, smart and responsible way to address our nation's energy needs is to look beyond dirty energy and focus on clean sources like wind, solar and geothermal, as well as energy efficiency. Dollar for dollar, investing in clean energy will put more Americans to work than wasting money on perpetuating our national addiction to dirty, 19th century fossil fuels. We are supposed to learn from the past, right?

A couple of weeks ago, my wife and I took our two young children on an Amtrak trip from the San Francisco Bay Area to Colorado and back. One particularly spectacular stretch took us through the Sierra Nevada foothills — Gold Country. Even now, more than 150 years later, you can see hillsides that were obliterated by high-pressure hydraulic mining as people lost sight of what's important and went crazy with lust for quick riches. In 2012, all too often it's gas companies that have run amok over America's landscapes. It's time to bring them under control.

Exporting natural gas is not in our country's best interest. That's why the Sierra Club filed a protest before the U.S. Department of Energyopposing the Cove Point LNG export facility and asked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencyand White House Council on Environmental Quality to oppose it as well. It's simply irresponsible to speed up fracking in order to ship LNG overseas. If we can't get natural gas out of the ground safely, we should just leave it there.

Michael Brune is executive director of the Sierra Club. His email is executive.director@sierraclub.org.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • On fracking, O'Malley betrays his supposed principles

    On fracking, O'Malley betrays his supposed principles

    Wenonah Hauter's Dec. 3 op-ed, "There is no safe fracking, Mr. O'Malley," was exactly the kind of criticism that the O'Malley administration, and their self-proclaimed commitment to "protecting our environment" deserves. Opening Maryland to fracking undermines any goal the O'Malley administration...

  • The frackers are coming, the frackers are coming!

    The frackers are coming, the frackers are coming!

    History, myth, and legend informs those of us in the United States that on a chilly night in 1775 a relative of mine mounted his horse, and as loudly as he could, rode through the streets of Boston proclaiming that an invading fleet was entering the harbor aiming to muzzle and arrest any acts of...

  • Fracking will boost Maryland's economy

    Fracking will boost Maryland's economy

    Wenonah Hauter's recent op-ed on the dangers of fracking in Maryland missed the mark completely ("There is no safe fracking, Mr. O'Malley," Dec. 3).

  • Garrett benefits from vacationers

    Garrett benefits from vacationers

    A recent article by reporter Tim Wheeler about the issue of natural gas development in Garrett County contains a statement from a local Chamber of Commerce board member and farmer who has been a fairly vocal advocate for natural gas development ("Fracking debate intensifies in Western Maryland,"...

  • Sierra Club opposes fracking plan

    Sierra Club opposes fracking plan

    A recent article reported that the Sierra Club "praised the administration's conclusions" regarding opening the state to fracking ("O'Malley administration sets out path to fracking in Md.," Nov. 25).

  • Western Md. faces fracking threat

    Western Md. faces fracking threat

    The recent article about fracking in Western Maryland seemed to me to raise more arguments for not drilling for natural gas in Garrett County than for it ("Fracking debate intensifies in Western Maryland, those benefits would be relatively short-term since "Western Maryland's gas reserves are limited."

  • Fracking in W. Maryland is not a done deal

    Fracking in W. Maryland is not a done deal

    I am sending this letter out as a mother, as a small farmer, as a Garrett County property owner and tax payer, and as a member of a community that I care deeply about.

  • Thank God Hogan wasn't in charge of the fracking report

    Thank God Hogan wasn't in charge of the fracking report

    Maryland's recent report on fracking safely is an example of smart governing ("O'Malley administration sets out path to fracking in Md.," Nov. 25). In July 2011, Gov. Martin O'Malley ordered a commission to be formed by the Maryland Department of the Environment and the Department of Natural Resources....

Comments
Loading

72°