Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Op-Eds

Does Baltimore think trash cans cause litter?

On Oct. 22, the Baltimore City Council passed a bill confirming my long-held belief that people in Baltimore actually think trash cans cause litter. Though the bill appears simply to criminalize the dumping of excess quantities of noxious waste in public trash receptacles, it echoes many conversations I have had over the years asking about putting more trash cans around the city. Repeatedly, I would hear — from fellow citizens, to small shopkeepers, to contacts with well-placed staff in the Department of Public Works and the City Council — variations on this theme: "The more trash cans we put out, the more people dump in and around them and the messier things get, and neighbors ask us to remove them. Plus, we don't have the budget to empty the cans often enough."

This perverse logic actually reinforces the need for even more trash collection options. Rather than criminalizing the disposal of more than one pound or one cubic foot of waste in public trash receptacles, the city should put out more cans and collect them more often.

In contrast, I have observed that there is typically little litter on the streets of New York City, with 10 times Baltimore's population. From Harlem to Coney Island, and from the Hudson to the East River, there are public trash cans on most street corners.

In Baltimore, except in a few neighborhoods around the Inner Harbor, public trash cans are hard to find, and litter blows everywhere. The amount of debris is a corrosive suggestion that people don't care about their environment.

Trash on the streets is a function of the fact that there are not enough trash cans available, which reflects the deeply held belief in Baltimore that trash cans cause litter and illegal dumping. Instead of providing more trash cans and collections, the city now seeks to prosecute those who choose to use them.

Economics 101 tells us that as a commodity becomes rare, it becomes more valuable. As public trash collection remains under-available, desperate people are likely to engage in the "theft of services" represented by illegal dumping and littering.

People dump trash and litter not simply because they are lazy and won't walk a piece of trash into their own homes to wait for the weekly curbside trash collection. Of course, for some people, that's part of it. But by and large, people dump because there's no convenient place to dispose of refuse. An essential city service like trash collection should not become such a rare commodity that people abuse it when it is available.

A case in point is the busy, still somewhat verdant, two-mile stretch of 33rd Street in Northeast Baltimore that is home to one high school, a large YMCA recreation campus with senior housing, a grocery store and a hospital, and is bisected by several major transportation arteries and bus lines. A second high school and a lower school are in very close proximity, and during rush hours, vehicle and pedestrian traffic is heavy. Litter is widespread along 33rd Street, due to the undersupply of trash receptacles, especially at busy bus transfer corners.

By my count, there are only 11 public trash receptacles along 33rd Street between Lake Montebello and Greenmount Avenue, and they are nearly always overflowing with refuse. No intersection has trash cans at all four corners; only one intersection has more than one trash can nearby, and most have none at all.

"Dumpster Days" in many city neighborhoods are eagerly anticipated, and the containers fill rapidly. Making it easy to do the right thing is the cost of doing business for a city and promoting the civility of our shared public spaces.

Abundantly available trash cans, whether in New York City or North Baltimore, reinforce the point that trash belongs in them — not on the streets. If trash cans are more available, trash collection will become less of a stolen commodity, disposing of trash won't become a crime, and it will remain among the basic city services necessary to sustain the quality of our lives together.

Daniel Buccino is a psychotherapist from Baltimore. His email is dbuccino@jhmi.edu.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Why Greeks should dump the euro
    Why Greeks should dump the euro

    By electing left-wing Syriza party leader Alexis Tsipras to be premier, Greeks voted to end the draconian economic measures imposed by Germany and other international lenders. After the dust settles, German Chancellor Angela Merkel will either backpedal on the austerity imposed on Athens or...

  • Obama faces reality
    Obama faces reality

    Perhaps six years too late, President Barack Obama gave strong indications in his State of the Union address last week that he's finally bought into Albert Einstein's definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

  • A path forward for responsible gas shale regulations
    A path forward for responsible gas shale regulations

    Editor's note: This piece has been updated with the author's correct email address. 

  • Jews, outnumbered by Muslims, suffer under mob rule
    Jews, outnumbered by Muslims, suffer under mob rule

    In the wake of the terrorist attack on a kosher market in Paris, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked French Jews to come home.

  • Baltimore: Gateway to America
    Baltimore: Gateway to America

    The Baltimore City Council just promulgated a new motto for the city of Baltimore: "The Birthplace of The Star Spangled Banner." I would like to suggest another, perhaps one that may also be shared with the state of Maryland: "The Gateway to America."

  • Attorneys general for a day
    Attorneys general for a day

    When Brian Frosh became Maryland's attorney general several weeks ago the program for the investiture ceremony informed us that he was Maryland's 46th attorney general. There are some traditionalists, however — and perhaps some querulous archival purists — who would knock Frosh down...

Comments
Loading