Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99


News Opinion Op-Eds

The U.S. should stay out of Iraq [Commentary]

President Barack Obama has illegally dispatched 300 military trainers or advisors to Iraq to support an illegal sectarian Shiite government headed by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

The United States Constitution prohibits the president from re-engaging the United States military in Iraq to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) without new congressional authorization. Further, the struggle for sectarian power there is irrelevant to our national security. Without the justification of self-defense, United States intervention would additionally create a precedent that would invite intervention by Russia or China in their neighboring countries.

The Constitution's architects were unanimous in assigning exclusively to Congress the most significant decisions in the life of a nation, i.e., whether to cross the Rubicon from a state of peace to a state of war, which makes legal what is customarily first-degree murder. All history teaches that the executive authority chronically manufactures or inflates danger to justify gratuitous wars with the goal of aggrandizing power, for example: secrecy, detention without trial, curtailment of civil liberties and the limitless use of lethal force. Accordingly, James Madison, father of the Constitution, wrote to Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence: "The constitution supposes, what the history of all governments demonstrates, that the executive is the branch of power most interested in war and most prone to it. It has accordingly with studied care vested the question of war in the legislature [under Article I, section 8, clause 11]."

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 left undisturbed the Constitution's equilibrium between Congress and the president over war. Section 8 specifically declares that the resolution is not "intended to alter the constitutional authority of Congress or of the president." And section 2 asserts that the president may employ the armed forces only if there is a congressional declaration of war, specific statutory authorization or an actual or imminent attack upon the United States.

The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 is confined to defending the United States against threats posed by then President Saddam Hussein or to enforcing United Nations Security Council Resolutions. Neither of these conditions is met by ISIS's actions in Iraq.

The 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force is limited to attacks on persons complicit in the 9/11 abominations, all of whom have been either killed or captured. Moreover, ISIS is an enemy of al-Qaida, not an ally, branch or satellite.

Without an authorization to use military force, President Obama lacks authority to re-engage the United States militarily in Iraq unless Congress enacts authorizing legislation.

Congress should not do so. It would make the United States a co-belligerent with the dictatorial, corrupt and sectarian government of Iraq and thus expose us to attack by ISIS. It would also implicate us in Prime Minister Maliki's crimes.

Iraq is an artificial state carved out of the ruins of the Ottoman Empire after World War I. It is destined to splinter into three: a Kurdish state in the north, a Sunni state in the center and a Shiite state in the south. The United States can do nothing to alter this inevitability. A partitioned Iraq, however, will be preoccupied with domestic concerns unthreatening to the United States or Israel.

The pointlessness of a United States military intervention in Iraq would be compounded by the troublesome precedent that could be invoked to crush democracy. A Russian military intervention in Ukraine would be justified in order to restore ousted President Viktor Yanukovich. China could be justified in sending troops to Burma to prevent the ascendancy to the presidency of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi.

In sum, the optimal (and legal) policy of the United States toward Iraq at present is active watching. Getting involved yet again is illegal and will only make things worse.

Bruce Fein was an associate deputy attorney general under President Ronald Reagan and is the current Chairman of the National Commission on Intelligence and Foreign Wars, and author of "American Empire Before the Fall." His email is

To respond to this commentary, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Obama's fate and legacy

    Obama's fate and legacy

    When American presidents leave office, they hope they will have left behind a legacy of good works earning history's good judgment. Some, like Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln and FDR, achieve that distinction, but most others fall short in one way or another.

  • Obama defends his foreign policy doctrine [Commentary]

    Obama defends his foreign policy doctrine [Commentary]

    The president says those who call for military action in Ukraine "haven't really learned the lesson of the last decade"

  • Obama at West Point [Editorial]

    Obama at West Point [Editorial]

    Our view: The president offered a pragmatic view of how U.S. foreign policy should be conducted that we believe most Americans share

  • The resurrection of Brian Williams

    The resurrection of Brian Williams

    Now that NBC News has taken erstwhile anchorman Brian Williams to the woodshed and kicked him into the shallower pool of cable news at MSNBC, he has a second chance to make a second impression.

  • Missing the point in Baltimore

    Missing the point in Baltimore

    In their book, "Adventures in Missing the Point," Brian McLaren and Tony Campolo contend that limited ways of thinking prevent us from accurately diagnosing our situation, and hence, offering a remedy for our problems. "If global capitalism makes the rich richer and leaves the poor in poverty,...

  • Justice for childhood sexual abuse survivors

    Justice for childhood sexual abuse survivors

    Childhood sexual abuse survivors who seek legal redress against their perpetrators share a common goal: a fair chance to establish the truth of what was done to them as children. No more, no less. But given the unfairness of our justice system's disposition of survivor cases, that goal is elusive...

  • Act to prevent a crude oil derailment in Maryland

    Act to prevent a crude oil derailment in Maryland

    Two years ago, dozens of runaway rail tanker cars carrying 1.5 million gallons of crude oil derailed in the center of the Quebec town of Lac-Megantic, creating a massive explosion and resulting in the death of 47 individuals and the destruction of over 30 buildings. But what would happen if this...

  • Police add insult to injury after mugging

    Police add insult to injury after mugging

    On June 15th I was mugged for the first time in my life, for a bicycle with about zero resale value and shoddy brakes. I was accosted by a group of about 15 youths on the Gwynns Falls Trail and escaped unscathed, minus a bicycle. Traumatic, yes. But it could have been worse.