In Case You Missed It: Baltimore Running Festival photos
NewsOpinionOp-Eds

Scouts' honor

Clubs and AssociationsBoy Scouts of AmericaRick PerryIntel Corp.

The leaders of the Boy Scouts of America are expected to vote tomorrow on whether to scrap the organization's long-standing national ban on admitting gay Scouts and Scout leaders, and to replace it with a policy that allows the religious and civic organizations that sponsor individual Scout units to set their own rules on the issue. The ban on gay Scouts is an anachronism that flies in the face of the overdue societal trend toward greater inclusiveness, tolerance and acceptance of diversity. We hope the group's leaders will seize the opportunity presented by this vote to do what's morally and ethically right for the 2.7 million member group whose values have shaped the character of generations of American boys and young men.

In recent years, the Scouts have come under increasing criticism for explicitly excluding gay young people and their families. Individual Scouts and Scout troops have openly protested the ban on their websites or in petition drives aimed at persuading large corporate sponsors to disassociate themselves from the discriminatory policy. Their efforts have pressured the group to open its ranks to all qualified individuals regardless of sexual orientation, a stance the Girl Scouts of America has maintained since 1992.

Opposition to accepting gay boys has come mainly from the more conservative of the religious organizations that sponsor Scout troops. Of the more than 110,000 Scouting units across the U.S., nearly 70 percent are chartered by religious organizations, not all of which object to the inclusion of gay Scouts. However, the Catholic Church, Southern Baptists and Mormon churches are among those prominently involved in setting national policy — and in insisting that the ban against gays remain in effect. They have repeatedly threatened to end their involvement in Scouting if gays are allowed to participate.

In practice, what that has meant is that gay Scouts and Scout leaders who want to take part in Scouting activities have had to hide their sexual orientation the same way gays in the military were once forced to lie about who they were. And the lying didn't end there. Scout troops that didn't agree with the ban had to pretend they didn't know there were gays in their midst or find other means of dissembling to protect openly gay members. All of that contravened the first tenet of the Scouting creed: A Scout should be trustworthy.

That the Scouts' national leadership has decided to reconsider the ban on gays at this moment is almost certainly due to pressure from corporate donors who are increasingly uncomfortable being seen as supporting an institution that openly practices discrimination. Over the last year or so, a number of large corporate contributors, including Intel and UPS, have publicly announced their intention to end their support of the Scouts unless the policy is changed.

Their actions undoubtedly influenced President Barack Obama's decision to add his voice to the debate on Sunday before the Super Bowl, when he reaffirmed his support for equal rights for all people regardless of sexual orientation. "My attitude is that gays and lesbians should have access and opportunity, the same way everybody else does, in every institution and walk of life," he said. "The Scouts are a great institution that are promoting young people and exposing them to opportunities and leadership that will serve people for the rest of their lives. And I think that nobody should be barred for that."

While several leading Republicans, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, have denounced any move that would change the Boy Scouts' strict no-gays policy, we hope wiser heads will prevail. The proposed change wouldn't force church-sponsored Scout units to adopt policies that went against their religious traditions. But it would simply prevent them from imposing those views on others who don't share their beliefs.

That's not a perfect solution, and it would still leave some Scout units free to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. But given the Scouts' present reliance on church-sponsored groups for such a large number of troops, it may be the most practical approach available at this point. It would represent an important step toward equality in line with changes in attitudes toward gays in all aspects of American life, and it would doubtless spark a broader discussion within the group of its mission and goals. A century after its founding, admitting all worthy members, regardless of sexual orientation, could be a first step along that path.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    Clubs and AssociationsBoy Scouts of AmericaRick PerryIntel Corp.
    • Church welcomes scouting decision
      Church welcomes scouting decision

      The Boy Scouts of America has lifted its ban on gay boys being full participants in their programs ("Scouts lift ban on gay youths," May 24). Much of the news has centered in the backlash from "faith-based organizations" which sponsor Boy Scout troops. Churches, in...

    • Scouting's gay ban was justified and right
      Scouting's gay ban was justified and right

      The Sun's recent editorial on the Boy Scouts of America ("Scouts and equality," May 23) leaped right over the Scout Mission Statement, "To prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetime…," because it conflicted with the...

    • Gays have no place in Boys Scouts
      Gays have no place in Boys Scouts

      The Sun's editors are the only people I know who can speak of homosexuality and morality in the same breath ("Scout's honor," Feb. 6) when, in fact, they are totally opposite. The scriptures make it plain that homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord. Men...

    • Southern Baptists love the Scouts, unless they happen to be gay
      Southern Baptists love the Scouts, unless they happen to be gay

      As I read the article about the Southern Baptists' position on gay scouts I couldn't help thinking about the wonderful song from the musical South Pacific entitled "You Have to be Taught to Hate" ("Southern Baptists condemn Boy Scouts policy on gays," June 13).

    • Proud of my scout, not of the Scouts
      Proud of my scout, not of the Scouts

      The organization teaches all the right values, except one

    • The Scouts and gays
      The Scouts and gays

      Religious organizations have always been the foundation of Scouting, but a ban on homosexuals is now bad for business

    Comments
    Loading