Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Op-Eds

The hidden health risks of fracking

Imagine you are a nurse working in an emergency room, and a worker on a gas fracking well comes in covered in chemicals used in the drilling process. You call the gas company to find out what chemicals are being used to help in your assessment of possible health risks to your patient, and even yourself, but find out they don't have to disclose this information. Or, imagine you are a public health nurse in a community with many natural gas fracking wells, and you notice complaints of well-water contamination. How can you assess the extent of the issue without baseline data on water quality or knowledge of the chemicals used in the fracking process?

As nurses, we strongly support our right to know in order to protect the health of our communities and the environment. That's why the American Nurses Association House of Delegates last month passed a resolution highlighting the important role nurses play in advocating for the health of their patients and communities when faced with fracking. As the number of natural-gas fracking wells has increased exponentially over the past 20 years, the public's right to know what chemicals are used in this process has become imperative to protect the public health. Fracking chemicals now being found in our water supplies have been linked to cancer and kidney, liver and neurological damage. Nurses working in rural areas are also describing how the quality of life in rural communities is being destroyed by drilling, well operations and truck traffic associated with fracking.

Because fracking is fairly new in many areas, statutory or regulatory processes have not adequately ensured health and environmental safety. In areas where fracking is taking place, the public is looking to nurses and other health care providers for answers. However, health care workers do not have access to vital chemical information.

A new report evaluating how states are dealing with fracking concludes that "no state is requiring enough upfront collection of baseline data and ongoing monitoring of drilling operations to ensure adequate protection of local water supplies and public health."

The report, "The Right to Know, the Responsibility to Protect" from OMB Watch, a government accountability group, outlines what an effective fracking disclosure policy would look like:

•Before receiving a drilling permit, the owners and operators of natural-gas wells should gather baseline information on nearby water sources and agree to regularly monitor water and air quality. This is a pretty basic way of making sure natural-gas drilling is safe.

•Information on chemicals used in fracking should be specific enough that scientists, health care providers and citizens know what to test for and can keep up to date on evidence about the health effects of different chemicals — as in, which ones cause cancer or other serious health problems.

•States should not allow gas companies to claim blanket "trade secret" exemptions to avoid releasing chemical information. This loophole hampers the ability of health care professionals to monitor for exposures and health effects. If it doesn't get fixed, then companies can claim any chemical is a trade secret, and disclosure becomes a farce. Pepsi and Coke publish the ingredients in their products on every can; the producers of fracking chemicals can do the same without revealing exact formulas that would put a company at a competitive disadvantage. Companies don't want to disclose the chemicals because they know the substances are dangerous, and the industry knows the public would want to stop their use.

•Finally, the report recommends that all this information be posted on a public website that is easy for average people to use and understand.

Gov.Martin O'Malleylast year ordered a study of the impact of fracking. Any conclusions reached must include a demand for better disclosure and oversight policies. We have a right to know what's in the ground and in our water, and state government has a responsibility to protect us.

There may soon be a number of gas wells operating in Maryland, and we need to be prepared. By instituting these common sense policies, Maryland has a chance to protect children, families, communities and our environment from harmful chemicals before fracking begins.

Katie Huffling is director of programs with the Baltimore-based Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments. "The Right to Know, the Responsibility to Protect" is available at http://www.ombwatch.org/naturalgasfrackingdisclosure.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Md. should ban fracking
    Md. should ban fracking

    Thank you for bringing attention to New York's recent ban on fracking ("Fracking ban in NY prompts calls for MD to follow suit," Dec. 17). I applaud Gov. Andrew Cuomo for putting the health of New Yorkers above the pressure for dirty energy. Now it's time for Maryland to do the same.

  • Fracking moratorium is the right step
    Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Your editorial ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25) got it right on all counts. Fracking simply does not mesh well with our tourist industry in Western Maryland.

  • Fracking not worth the risks
    Fracking not worth the risks

    I applaud The Baltimore Sun for its position in favor of a moratorium on fracking in Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). We are learning more every day of the irreparable damage being done to the environment and health of people living where hydraulic fracturing is taking place....

  • Fracking deserves a pause
    Fracking deserves a pause

    The Maryland House of Delegates gave final approval Tuesday to legislation that would place a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," to produce natural gas in this state for the next three years. The vote was 93-to-45, a two-thirds majority. The proposal offers the kind...

  • Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice
    Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice

    Maryland residents must support the moratorium on fracking and the "gold standard regulations" ("Health, environmental groups seek fracking moratorium," Feb. 5).

  • Why ruin Garrett County?
    Why ruin Garrett County?

    As a retired couple, one of many living in Garrett County, my wife and I find the possibility of fracking wells and all that comes with them completely distressing ("The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits," March 3). Having come from a metropolitan area industrialized to the...

  • Fracking poses problems for Western Md.
    Fracking poses problems for Western Md.

    Last week, a Garrett County resident testified in Annapolis that Maryland should proceed with fracking, the dangerous industrial practice recently banned in New York. He claimed that Western Maryland needs the jobs. I ask, what jobs?

  • The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits
    The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits

    State Sen. Bobby Zirkin's bill putting strict limits on fracking demonstrates the growing concern elected officials have about opening Maryland's doors to the oil and gas industry ("Frosh wades into fracking fight," Feb. 25).

Comments
Loading