Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionOp-Eds

Justice delayed in Maryland

Justice SystemExecutive BranchLitigation and RegulationU.S. Supreme Court

The retirement next month of Chief Judge Robert M. Bell of the Maryland Court of Appeals is a critical event, the first transition in the leadership of Maryland's courts in nearly 20 years.

A matter of central importance for the new chief judge must be the shocking state of the docket of the state's highest court, a problem that long predates Chief Judge Bell's stewardship.

Article IV, Section 15 of the Maryland Constitution requires that "an opinion, in writing, shall be filed within three months after the argument or submission of the cause." Although the Court of Appeals held in 1908 that this deadline was not mandatory, it was nonetheless generally observed. In 1972, Chief Judge Hall Hammond's last year, the average time between argument and decision was one month; the average time was 1.7 months as recently as 1977. New associate judges caused the time lag to drift to 8.5 months in 1988. Two years later, an exasperated Judge William Adkins, who retired early from the court, appealed in an article for "collegial will" to correct "this hands-off approach to the pace of litigation."

This protest produced improvement, the average delay falling to four months by 2007. In that year, the court stopped publishing the average delay in its Annual Report. Delays escalated to six months in 2009, eight months in 2010 and six months in 2011. In August 2011, The Daily Record calculated each judge's record, ranging from 1.6 months for Judge Alan Wilner, a retired judge rarely called to active service by the chief judge, to 24.2 months for Judge John Eldridge, the most frequently recalled judge. For the current judges, delays ranged from three months to 12. In one criminal case, an appeal remains pending seven years after argument — cold comfort for the defendant, who in the meantime has served his five-year prison sentence.

A 2012 follow-up study by The Daily Record credited all six associate judges with delays of no longer than four months. Chief Judge Bell's average was 31.5 months and that of Judge Eldridge 22.3 months. However, individual responsibility was obscured when an unprecedented torrent of 11 unsigned opinions, averaging 32.7 months' delay, was released in the summer of 2012.

Clark v. O'Malley, contesting the removal in November 2004 of a former Baltimore City police commissioner, is a particular embarrassment. In March 2008, the court held, after a delay of 17 months after grant of review, that Commissioner Clark could only be removed for cause and had not been so removed. His ensuing quest for damages, unsuccessful in the lower courts, was granted review in the Court of Appeals in September 2009. It remains fully argued, submitted, yet undecided nearly four years later.

While the court has been thus delinquent in its core function, it and the chief judge have distracted themselves by pursuing an aggressive, semi-political agenda. The state bar has been blanketed with questionnaires about pro bono activity and continuing legal education. Mandates for the first, however, are easily politicized, and for the second chiefly benefit the operators of cruise ships and ski resorts.

During Chief Judge Bell's 18-year tenure, he has promulgated 69 administrative orders under his authority as chief judge, several times the number published in the preceding 30 years. Of late, these have centered on a court-created Commission on Professionalism, which has published a useful handbook but has also begun campaigning for controversial causes like "civil Gideon" (extending the right to counsel in criminal cases to civil cases as well) and mandatory continuing education. The most remarkable administrative order transferred to the new, propagandizing Commission on Professionalism $300,000 of the funds provided by lawyers to finance the long-standing commission responsible for "regulation of the practice of law in Maryland and implementation of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct." It also imposes a permanent assessment on lawyers for the future upkeep of the new body.

The new commission is constituted so as to be completely under the control of the chief judge. The first among its "Ideals of Professionalism" appropriately proclaims: "Punctuality promotes the credibility of a lawyer. Tardiness and neglect denigrate the individual as well as the legal profession." This admonition needs to be directed inward as well as outward.

The Daily Record editorial board has observed: "This is not merely personal. Opinions are issued by the Court, and it is the Court as a whole that bears responsibility for running itself in a responsible manner." Judges who have quietly acquiesced in an indefensible situation and who have not committed themselves to drastic change do not deserve promotion. Chief judgeships should not be filled on the principle of "Buggins' turn" giving brief tenure to senior judges, nor should courts become career bureaucracies whose members are looking toward the governor's office and the next rung on the ladder. The next chief judge of the Court of Appeals should be someone sensitive to clients, costs and deadlines.

His or her agenda should center on the court's opinions, not on its rule-making and support agencies.

The court's most influential action in the last century was the decision in Brady v. Maryland imposing on prosecutors a duty to disclose exculpatory evidence. It was the product of a restrained court exercising its core function, was affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court, and has been followed throughout the English-speaking world.

Chief Judge Bell during his tenure reasserted the independence of his court from the governor's office in politically charged cases involving reapportionment, public utility regulation and election laws, and introduced specialized courts for drug cases and complex business cases. His opinions, including those in dissent, have kept his court honest on questions of criminal procedure. As an opinion-writer he never forgot that the central function of courts in any free society is the prevention of arbitrary imprisonment: the protection of personal liberty, properly so called. That, and not ill-conceived side shows and a history of delay, which he inherited, should be his legacy.

Social justice is not fostered by clogging civil dockets through new and imperfectly understood rules, nor will liberty be preserved by a dilatory court or a cowed and over-regulated bar.

James B. Astrachan (jastrachan@agtlayers.com), George W. Liebmann (george.liebmann2@verizon.net) and Henry R. Lord (henryrlord@gmail.com) are members of the Baltimore bar.

Clarification: An earlier version of this article failed to credit The Daily Record as the source of the 2011 and 2012 studies on each judge's average delays in issuing opinions. The Sun regrets the omission.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Justice SystemExecutive BranchLitigation and RegulationU.S. Supreme Court
  • Professionalism Center a key part of Md. legal landscape
    Professionalism Center a key part of Md. legal landscape

    As the executive director of the Maryland Professionalism Center, I was drawn to The Sun's June 10th op-ed- piece titled "Justice delayed in Maryland," which promised a commentary on the potential prejudice to litigants caused by the Maryland Court of Appeals' delay in deciding the cases before...

  • Closing the achievement gap would bolster U.S. economy
    Closing the achievement gap would bolster U.S. economy

    As an American, I am proud that our country leads the world in innovation and job creation. I am also aware that our success is leveraged on decisions we made more than a half century ago to invest in high-quality public education for all our children.

  • Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'
    Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'

    OK, I can't help myself. Over the past three years, I have written at least a dozen columns critical of Obamacare (a.k.a. The "Affordable Care Act") in this space and devoted an entire chapter to the topic in my book "America: Hope for Change."

  • Maryland delegation should petition for release of Cuban Five
    Maryland delegation should petition for release of Cuban Five

    In 1999, I accompanied the Baltimore Orioles on their historic trip to Havana, Cuba. This marked the first time since 1959 that a Major League Baseball team played in Cuba. Many of us hoped that a baseball game involving teams from the United States and Cuba might be a precursor to normalized...

  • Kids ID cards cross a line
    Kids ID cards cross a line

    "The Hunger Games." "The Giver." "Divergent."

  • Calling women to action for a stronger democracy
    Calling women to action for a stronger democracy

    There was a time that Maryland's congressional delegation included as many women as men. Remarkably, in 1984, Maryland voters elected women to half of the state's seats in Congress: Reps. Helen Bentley, Beverly Byron, Marjorie Holt and Barbara Mikulski. In the election of 2014, exactly 30 years...

  • Media message unfair to missing child
    Media message unfair to missing child

    I was relieved to hear that the missing 12-year-old Baltimore County girl was found and returned to her worried parents. Yet I still remain perplexed at the way her disappearance was reported. Seemingly in the same breath that news outlets reported that the child was missing, they also reported...

  • NSA scandals caused rift with U.S. allies
    NSA scandals caused rift with U.S. allies

    No single issue has caused greater damage to the trust between the United States and its allies than the sweeping revelations of the National Security Agency's global surveillance programs. This story continues to fuel the perception that we no longer care to uphold our values at home or...

Comments
Loading