Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Op-Eds
News Opinion Op-Eds

Marches and more police won't stop Baltimore's violence

Violence in Baltimore is not unique or even out of the ordinary — it is to be expected. For those of us who grew up in neighborhoods that were more like war zones and in communities that were more like deserts, the truth underlying the violence within this city can be found in our own narratives, our minds, bodies and souls. For those of us who have struggled to survive on little to nothing, went to schools that operated more like prisons than places of critical learning and engagement, or suffered harassment within various institutions because perceived or actual sexual orientation, the context underpinning not only the violence recently but also the violence that has persisted since my childhood is crystal clear.

Whether we are discussing violence writ large in Baltimore or this recent upsurge of gun violence in the city, it behooves us to see these incidents not as abnormalities but as symptoms of underlying social and cultural issues that have gone unchecked for decades. With drastic cuts to vital civic support services over the years, it is no surprise to me that violence persists and spikes. I hope that we take this moment, on the heels of devastating news about gun violence, to have a different conversation and provide different solutions for this pernicious series of events.

While more policing seems intuitive and the obvious way to stop the violence in Baltimore, it will not. History has shown us, especially in Baltimore, that more policing simply displaces violence but never effectively stops it. That is what has happened as a result of the blue light cameras, and it could be seen again last week when four people were shot just around the corner from a block that police had effectively walled off. Some might even argue that greater policing only serves to create and sustain root cause issues that fuel violence; it sends more people to prison, which makes them unemployable and prone to more crime when they return to their neighborhoods.

It is my belief that to meaningfully address the issue of gun violence we must remedy the underlying causes. I grew up in South Baltimore, mostly Cherry Hill, one of the most economically depressed neighborhoods in the city. I now know from experience and education what I knew intuitively as a child — that we must rectify black unemployment and underemployment if we are to effectively deal with gun violence. We must talk about both race and racism, what it means to be both black and of low socioeconomic status in Baltimore, and how it often forces people to the margins all the while denying them access to vital support services.

To effectively address gun violence in Baltimore City we must address the contexts that produce violence. We must dismantle the school-to-prison pipeline, stop intimate partner violence, and not only interrupt bullying based on perceived or actual sexual orientation and gender expression but also create affirming spaces for all youth to feel safe and supported. The reality of the situation in Baltimore is indeed dire and holistic, and systematic approaches are what is needed to curb the tide of violence.

Therefore, I do not believe that events like the recent 300 Man March or more police presence is enough to rectify this string of gun violence or the long history of violence that has plagued Baltimore since my childhood. These types of responses attempt to address individual level issues, which is absolutely critical, but they fall overwhelmingly short in addressing the larger systematic and sociocultural context that fuels and sustains violence in its many manifestations. What is truly required to address gun violence in Baltimore cannot and will not be remedied by 300 men and will most likely only be exacerbated by increased police presence.

Instead, what we really need is authentic dialogue around race, gender, sexuality and how some kinds of violence are treated differently from others. We need to hear not only from the men who are most immediately impacted, but we must also hear from women and the youth. Ultimately, we need more affordable housing, increased employment opportunities, better schools, more parks and playgrounds, more recreational centers, affordable child care, an increased minimum wage and meaningful employment for youth. In reality, effectively addressing gun violence should be less about capturing the "bad" guys but instead should be concerned about the social and cultural forces that produce them.

Durryle Brooks, a Baltimore native, is a doctoral student in Social Justice Education at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His email is dnbrooks@smcm.edu.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Batts doesn't understand how to improve police-community relations in Baltimore

    Batts doesn't understand how to improve police-community relations in Baltimore

    At the urging of President Barack Obama in response to unrest in Ferguson, Mo., Baltimore Police Commissioner Anthony Batts is serving on the White House task force to identify crime prevention strategies and ways to improve levels of trust for law enforcement operations nationwide ("Police Commissioner...

  • Police and mental health

    Police and mental health

    Baltimore City Police Commissioner Anthony Batts plans to send mental health professionals to accompany police officers responding to emergency calls involving people suspected of mental illness, an initiative we hope could prevent more tragedies when difficult situations turn violent. More significantly,...

  • A negative return on investing in prisons

    A negative return on investing in prisons

    As executive director at Marian House in Baltimore City, a refuge for women returning to the community from prison, I read with great interest the recent Sun article "Report: Sandtown-Winchester leads state in number of people incarcerated" (Feb. 25). I've spent the last 18 years working with people...

  • Why is the city dragging its feet on police body cameras?

    Why is the city dragging its feet on police body cameras?

    Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake says she will veto a City Council bill requiring all Baltimore police officers to wear body cameras ("City Council approves police body camera bill," Nov. 10).

  • Mayor is right to see black-on-black crime as a major problem

    Mayor is right to see black-on-black crime as a major problem

    I take strong exception to Kim Marie Carrington's letter criticizing Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake for trying to address the problem of black-on-black crime ("Mayor's focus on black-on-black crime is divisive and unhelpful," March 17).

  • Prosecute criminals with guns

    Prosecute criminals with guns

    I am responding to Austin Barry's letter that suggests punishing those who supply firearms to others who do not have a legal right to posses them ("Punish the gun enablers," April 3). He believes the laws need to be changed.

  • End drug crime by banning cash

    End drug crime by banning cash

    I would like to make some comments on the "streets" as they are today ("Enablers of 'bad guys with guns' hard to trace," April 1). First and foremost, there is only one medium of exchange on the black market or underground economy and that would be cash, which is untraceable. I speak from experience...

  • City police mired in bureaucracy

    City police mired in bureaucracy

    I enjoyed reading your article, "No reward for store owner who provided top on robber (April 7), but not the substance of it. What was presented was just another piece of evidence that the police are nothing more than another bureaucracy.

Comments
Loading
75°