Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Op-Eds

Maryland's pretrial detention is unfair [Commentary]

Changing a pretrial justice system challenges every principal player to do things differently.

That's the situation Maryland's elected officials, judges, prosecutors, public defenders and pretrial investigators face as they encounter the most monumental transition in pretrial justice since the Supreme Court recognized a poor person's constitutional right to counsel in 1963.

This fall the Maryland Court of Appeals issued a constitutional mandate that promised a public defender to poor people when their liberty is first at stake. And weeks ago, a state task force heard a recommendation that Maryland judicial officers forego monetary bail in most situations and use an objective risk assessment to determine the probability of a defendant fleeing or endangering others.

While both suggestions would vastly improve our current system, there appears to be resistance to each.

Newly-arrested people in Maryland — typically low-income African-Americans facing non-violent charges — are still going to their initial appearance hearings without a public defender. And the state's attorney general asked the appeals court to reconsider its ruling.

While the court rejected the do-over request, it also declined to order immediate representation. That encouraged more push-back and delay, and, predictably, nothing has yet changed — including funding for the Public Defender's office.

Judicial officers continue to order monetary bail, absent information from public defenders and pretrial investigators. And many people accused of non-violent crimes can expect to spend Christmas and New Year's in jail awaiting trial.

Whatever happened to the old-fashioned idea of state officials following a high court's constitutional ruling?

A risk-based assessment, one that still took into account input from the principle players, would change the system so that pretrial freedom would no longer depend on the defendant's wealth. Instead it would rest upon a fact-based evaluation of whether a person posed a significant public danger or was likely to flee. It would free taxpayers from paying the high cost of unnecessary incarceration and improve community safety by preventing dangerous defendants from purchasing freedom.

Risk assessment also provides a transparency often lacking when judicial officers rule without such a tool. Too often, bail bears little relation to defendants' financial reality. Over time, a trustworthy risk assessment enhances public respect for even-handed justice.

The current money system benefits the bail bond industry and friends, who share in the handsome profits generated when people are desperate to gain release from jail. Bondsmen claim that paying their 10 percent fee — rather than pretrial supervision and denying bail — best protects public safety and ensures reappearance in court. But many pretrial justice experts and law enforcement members disagree.

The risk assessment provides a reasonable, viable alternative.

The advocacy of professor Doug Colbert and his students at the University of Maryland School of Law led to the ruling requiring that public defenders appear at all bail hearings. His email is

To respond to this commentary, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • A wake-up call for Maryland's criminal justice system [Letter]

    A wake-up call for Maryland's criminal justice system [Letter]

    Judge Alfred Nance's recent order requiring the assistance of legal counsel to defendants at pre-trial hearings hopefully will serve as a wake-up call for Maryland's criminal justice system ("Court order could push state to send lawyers to bail hearings," Jan. 15).

  • Judges and holiday compassion [Letter]

    Judges and holiday compassion [Letter]

    While Maryland officials remain at odds about implementing poor people's constitutional guarantee to counsel at first appearances ("Maryland has an opportunity to lead the way in bail reform," Nov. 29), the judiciary can help break the logjam and demonstrate the benefits of taking a humanitarian...

  • Reform bail system, don't discard it [Commentary]

    Reform bail system, don't discard it [Commentary]

    Removing financial-based bail in Maryland would cause more problems than it would solve

  • Maryland has an opportunity to lead the way in bail reform [Editorial]

    Our view: The state should give serious thought to a proposal to move away from a financially secured bail system to one rooted solely in risk assessment.

  • Baltimore needs school choice

    Baltimore needs school choice

    Nearly a half-century after local and national uprisings around the passing of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., what is the one aspect of the urban condition in Baltimore that has changed too little but can transform a person's life and livelihood, and ultimately his or her community?

  • The tragedy after Hurricane Katrina

    The tragedy after Hurricane Katrina

    After the storm waters of Hurricane Katrina subsided, devastation remained: unsafe and waterlogged structures, with moldy, crumbling walls; unsalvageable fridges and soggy couches; indoor rivulets of mud. Local economies collapsed. A million people were displaced. Thousands of residents lost everything...