Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Op-Eds

Planning for the worst

It's every parent's worst nightmare: the call that comes in the middle of the night or interrupts a workday. It's the police or hospital calling to say that your child is in critical condition. As an emergency medicine physician, sometimes I have been the one to break such news, and it never gets easier.

Two years ago, a good friend received that call. A car accident had left her teenage son brain dead. At the heartbreaking memorial service, my friend shared the bittersweet comfort she and her family derived knowing that a part of her son lived on in the many people he helped through the donation of his organs.

Some parents don't even get to have that comfort.

I didn't know Nathan Krasnopoler, a Johns Hopkins University sophomore who died when he was only 20, but as the only physician in the Maryland legislature, I came to know his family well.

Nathan was riding his bicycle near campus when a turning motorist hit him and trapped him under her car. A helmet protected Nathan's head, but his lungs collapsed, depriving him of oxygen for 15-20 minutes. Despite the best of care, Nathan was left unable to move his body, react to sound, or have any awareness. His neurological exams showed only the most primitive brain stem functions. Until he died six months later, Nathan existed in a persistent vegetative state.

Like most 20-year olds, Nathan did not have an advance directive, but the law designated his parents to be his health care surrogates, able to make medical decisions in his best interest.

Faced with the inevitable and knowing Nathan's character and values, his family believed he would have wanted something positive to emerge from his tragic situation. Donations of nonvital organs — especially a kidney or lobe of the liver — are more successful when taken from a living donor. In fact, people make this voluntary gift every day.

But because Nathan had left no specific advance directive, the transplant and ethics committees at both the University of Maryland and Johns Hopkins hospitals declined Nathan's family's offer. Although his parents had the authority to refuse life-sustaining treatment, they were deemed unable to authorize organ donation because the committees could not certify that organ donation surgery — even though a low-risk procedure — was in Nathan's "best interest."

After Nathan's death, his family approached me to offer legislation that would allow health care surrogates to permit nonvital organ donation from patients in a persistent vegetative state. I agreed and drafted House Bill 449.

While Nathan's mother and brother gave compelling testimony at the bill hearing, the opposition focused on the fact that Nathan had not designated his wishes. Some feared this would open the door to disabled people becoming unwilling and unknowing organ donors. Without specific patient direction, there is no way to be certain what an individual would want.

Because of these concerns, it became clear the bill would not pass. However, there were important lessons to be learned from Nathan's case.

We Americans cherish our freedom of choice. In light of our ardent individualism, it's puzzling that so few of us make decisions about something almost all of us will face: medical care at the end of our lives. Only about a third of Americans have completed advance directive forms, even though the forms are straightforward, free and legal in every state.

While we generally think of an advance directive as a responsibility of the elderly, it is just as essential for younger people. The leading cause of death in those under 35 is accidents and injuries that can trigger complex medical situations (remember Terri Schiavo?), including potential organ donation.

Thanks to medical progress, people are surviving many diseases and injuries that used to be fatal. Those like Nathan, who a few years ago might have died at the accident scene, are now often saved. The luckier ones recover, but others continue in a limbo state for months or years. As medical technology continues to advance, cases like Nathan's will become more common.

Who should make decisions about what care is appropriate? Government? Insurance companies? Doctors? Ethics committees? My belief is that the patient's values should prevail. And when the patient is no longer conscious or competent, the only way to apply those values is through an advance directive and designated health care agent.

As a physician, my goal is to provide accurate information to patients. As an elected representative, I want to be sure citizens know their rights. But if people haven't expressed their wishes, controversy and family upheaval ensues.

While end-of-life choices are difficult to contemplate, completing the advance directive form will bring peace of mind. And in the unfortunate event that the form becomes legally operative, it will bring comfort and reassurance to those we love.

Advance directives should become an ordinary paperwork task, as routine as renewing a driver's license or filing a tax return. Health care providers need to encourage patients to complete advance directives, no matter their age, and to apply them when they become necessary.

Nathan Krasnopoler went to his grave with organs that might have saved several lives. (Because he was not on a respirator, his precise time of death could not be predicted, so his organs could not be donated.) But if Nathan's experience helps to ensure that more people — old and young — complete advance directives, then he will have made a significant contribution after all.

Dr. Dan Morhaim, is deputy majority leader in the Maryland House of Delegates, a faculty member at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and author of the recently published book "The Better End: Surviving (and Dying) on Your Own Terms in Today's Modern Medical World" (www.thebetterend.com).

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The hazards of city bicycling and organ donations

    Dan Morhaim's op-ed regarding advanced directives troubled me in two ways ("Planning for the worst," June 6). First, even the most careful bicyclist is in danger, and secondly because parents don't ultimately have the right to decide on organ donations.

  • No weather TLC without TWC
    No weather TLC without TWC

    People love to talk about the weather. And people listen to those who know what they're talking about — like meteorology guru Jim Cantore. But when Verizon FiOS unexpectedly dropped The Weather Channel (TWC) from its line-up on March 10, those voices went silent for the cable company's...

  • The conservative case for same-sex marriage
    The conservative case for same-sex marriage

    Before the current Supreme Court session ends this summer, the justices will make a landmark decision on same-sex marriage. But conservatives shouldn't wait to lose in court. They should accept same-sex marriage now.

  • The people's representatives should be elected
    The people's representatives should be elected

    Members of Congress don't always complete their terms due to factors like death, a new job and scandal. When a House seat becomes vacant, the Constitution requires an election to fill it, and every House member has been elected. The 17th amendment established direct election of Senators as...

  • More quality teachers, fewer administrators
    More quality teachers, fewer administrators

    Each year when it is time for executive central office school officials to present their proposed school budget to local government officials for approval, a funny thing happens. The needs of children anchor the plea for more funding. From a political perspective, this is a tough plea to...

  • Supergirl Power
    Supergirl Power

    About a year ago, I walked into Gotham Comics in Westminster with the intention of restarting my comic book collection after letting it lie dormant since the comic book boom of the early 1990s. Upon entering the store I was immediately confused.

  • Calls for a constitutional convention are reckless
    Calls for a constitutional convention are reckless

    There's a right way and a wrong way to amend the United States Constitution, and far too many current state legislators are trying to do it the wrong way: by attempting to call our first constitutional convention since 1787.

  • Hogan's Maryland: open for big business
    Hogan's Maryland: open for big business

    Driving home to Baltimore from a meeting with a potential new customer one cold February afternoon, my wife and I chuckled when we crossed the state border. In addition to "Maryland Welcomes You," our state's "Enjoy Your Visit!" sign on Route 15 now read, "We're Open for Business," followed...

Comments
Loading