Text size: increase text sizedecrease text size

Courts won't allow a new poll tax

The editorial "A voting setback" (April 30) expressed concern over the Supreme Court ruling upholding Indiana's voter identification law and suggested, "It gives a green light to those who want to impose contemporary versions of poll taxes and literacy tests."

However, in 1964 the 24th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution disallowed the poll tax as a prerequisite for voting in federal elections.

Further, a 1966 Supreme Court ruling proclaimed that a poll tax violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, and thus extended this prohibition to all elections.

I hardly think that, in light of such decisions, we need to be overly concerned that any attempt "to impose a contemporary version of any poll tax" would withstand judicial review.

Chuck Marks

Perry Hall


To Our Readers: The Sun welcomes letters from readers. All letters become the property of The Sun, which reserves the right to edit them. Letters should include your name and address, along with day and evening telephone numbers. E-mail us: letters@baltsun.com; write us: Letters to the Editor, The Sun, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore 21278-0001; fax us: 410-332-6977

Related topic galleries: Political Candidates, Polls, Court Administration, Local Authority, Perry Hall, State Budgets, Elections

Get home delivery of The Sun and save over 50% off the newsstand price


Share your opinion on controversial topics in the news and read what others have to say

• Police surveillance
Should Baltimore police be able to spy on our neighbors within limits?

• School at North Ave. headquarters
Is the alternative school a good solution to deal with suspended and expelled students, or are there other options the Andres Alonso should have pursued?

• Proposed Keswick expansion
What do you think about Keswick's plans to expand into the Baltimore Country Club's land in Roland Park?

Meet The Sun's editorial board
Submit a letter to the Editor
Contribute to the Commentary pages