Text size: increase text sizedecrease text size

Activist judges still pose threat

The landmark decision of the Supreme Court on the Washington handgun law yielded two eye-opening revelations of critical importance to Americans ("Justices back gun owners," June 27).

The first is the majority opinion that the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment does give gun rights to individuals.

But the second revelation is that the reasoning behind the opinions of the dissenting justices should send cold shivers down the spines of freedom-loving Americans.

In his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens suggests that the Second Amendment should not interfere with legislators' intent. The majority opinion, he says, "would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons. ... I could not possibly conclude that the Framers made such a choice. For these reasons, I respectfully dissent."

Is the Bill of Rights not a limitation on the work of elected officials?

I used to think so. However, the court's ruling expanding eminent domain powers in the case of Kelo v. New London changed my mind.

Apparently, the Supreme Court has the power to virtually rewrite the Constitution without the approval of Americans.

I fear for our freedoms if our next president nominates a person to fill a Supreme Court vacancy who thinks the way that the dissenting justices in District of Columbia v. Heller do or the majority of justices in the Kelo v. New London ruling do.

I believe that had President Bush not nominated Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., a Kelo v. New London-style Supreme Court would have, in effect, struck down the Second Amendment in last week's ruling - and there is no appeal beyond the Supreme Court.

Earl P. Weaver

New Freedom, Pa.


To Our Readers: The Sun welcomes letters from readers. All letters become the property of The Sun, which reserves the right to edit them. Letters should include your name and address, along with day and evening telephone numbers. E-mail us: letters@baltsun.com; write us: Letters to the Editor, The Sun, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore 21278-0001; fax us: 410-332-6977

Related topic galleries: New London (New London, Connecticut), Public Officials, George Bush, John Paul Stevens, Personal Weapon Control, Local Authority, Court Administration

Get home delivery of The Sun and save over 50% off the newsstand price


Share your opinion about topics in the news

• Sarah Palin as McCain's running mate
Will selecting Sarah Palin as his running mate help John McCain win the support of Democrats who preferred Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama?

• Obama and the fight for civil rights
• Building a new arena in Baltimore
• Paying students to get good grades
• Democratic Party unity

Meet The Sun's editorial board
Submit a letter to the Editor
Contribute to the Commentary pages

Share your opinion on controversial topics in the news and read what others have to say

• Bay Bridge safety
Are you concerned about safety while traveling on the Bay Bridge following the fatal tractor-trailer accident?

• New city arena proposal
What do you think about the proposal to replace the 1st Mariner Arena in downtown Baltimore?

• Police surveillance
Should Baltimore police be able to spy on our neighbors within limits?