Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Editorial

News Opinion Editorial

Starbucks caves to the radical gun lobby

If there was any doubt about how cowed America is by the gun lobby, it was erased today by Howard Schultz, the president, chairman and CEO of Starbucks Coffee Company. After months of controversy over whether patrons should openly be allowed to carry firearms in the company's stores, Mr. Schultz issued an open letter to his fellow Americans announcing that he would not adopt a no-weapons policy but would kindly request that customers keep their guns at home.

The letter appeared (among other places) in a full-page ad in The Washington Post today, three days after a gunman sneaked a gun into the Washington Navy Yard and killed 12 people before being fatally shot by police. Even under those circumstances, Mr. Shultz felt the need to explain to gun advocates that "the presence of a weapon in our stores is unsettling and upsetting for many of our customers."

Unlike in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook school shooting, there has been relatively little discussion of gun control laws in the days since the Navy Yard massacre. No doubt part of the reason for that is the failure of serious gun control measures after Sandy Hook in all but a handful of states (Maryland, thankfully, being an exception to the rule), the inability of Congress to take any action whatsoever, and the recall of two Colorado senators whose votes helped enact a package of sensible restrictions earlier this year. And part of the reason is that the gunman in Washington, Aaron Alexis, used a standard pump-style shotgun rather than an assault weapon or a gun equipped with an oversized magazine.

Indeed, the gun control laws in Virginia, modest though they are, may have helped prevent the tragedy from being even greater. Alexis reportedly tried to buy an AR-15 — the same kind of rifle used in Sandy Hook and elsewhere — but was denied because Virginia does not allow the sale of such weapons to buyers from other states.

What's shocking, though, is that the Navy Yard shootings seem not to have so much as given the nation pause in celebrating its gun culture. When Texas Gov. Rick Perry came to Maryland to try to poach the state's businesses, his marquee stop was at the gun manufacturer Beretta at its facility about 20 miles from Washington. A group called Georgia Gun Owners, which bills itself as the state's only "no-compromise gun lobby," issued a news release blasting incorrect early reports that Alexis had used an AR-15 and announcing that in response, it would give away two of those guns to sweepstakes entrants who sign up at Georgia gun shows in the next few weeks.

It's that kind of in-your-face gun advocacy that prompted Mr. Schultz's modest request. Starbucks' policy has been to have no explicit policy on carrying guns in its stores, instead deferring to whatever the law is in each state. Some gun owners took that as a pro-gun stance by the coffee company, and they held rogue "Starbucks Appreciation Days" at some stores. Gun control advocates have responded with demonstrations of their own.

The easy response is to say that Starbucks, faced with a dispute between its customers, did what businesses try to do — find a way to keep everybody happy and buying $4 lattes. But what's astonishing is this: Mr. Schultz had no problem picking a side on gay marriage — his company was among several to publicly back a marriage equality measure in Washington state — but taking a stand that coffee shops should be free of firearms was too controversial for him.

Mr. Schultz was cowed not by the nation's mainstream, responsible gun owners but by a radical fringe that wants to normalize the idea that everyone should be armed everywhere at all times. The group of people who insist on carrying guns to Starbucks won't be satisfied until they can pack heat in churches, schools, hospitals and offices. Horrors like Monday's shooting make no difference. What's frightening is that, in much of the country, they're winning the argument.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • NRA's paranoia is catching

    NRA's paranoia is catching

    The Sun's editorial reflecting on the National Rifle Association convention in Nashville is an important statement on how the NRA has devalued our lives and our society ("Guns and the 'permanent darkness,'" April 16).

  • Maryland's gun law is working

    Maryland's gun law is working

    The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license from the...

  • Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    By overwhelming margins, polls show Americans support universal background checks for those seeking to purchase a firearm to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are dangerously mentally ill. Clearly, the last thing you want is for some paranoid personality, ranting and raving...

  • What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    In the article, "A unique Maryland marriage sits at center of Supreme Court case considering gay nuptials" (March 13), Carrie Evans, executive director of Equality Maryland, is quoted as saying the following:

  • Punish the gun enablers

    Punish the gun enablers

    Thank you, Dan Rodricks, for continuing to focus on how criminals acquire guns ("Enablers of gun crime hard to trace," April 2). A felon's access to guns would be limited to theft without enablers. And thefts of guns would be easier to trace.

  • Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

    Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

    During the recent gubernatorial campaign, The Sun and several thoughtful citizens were perplexed about the discrepancy between the National Rifle Association's notorious A- rating for Larry Hogan and the candidate's repeated promise that he won't overturn Maryland's gun law if elected. In fact,...

  • Politicians who claim to understand gun crime don't have a clue [Letter]

    Politicians who claim to understand gun crime don't have a clue [Letter]

    The two clowns in Annapolis who claim to understand gun crime don't have a clue ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding themselves with the 2013 Firearms Safety Act," Oct. 6).

  • Md. gun law is working [Letter]

    Md. gun law is working [Letter]

    Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding themselves...

Comments
Loading

72°