Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Editorial

'Trust us' isn't good enough for the NSA

National Security Agency director Gen. Keith Alexander faced a skeptical crowd at the annual Black Hat hackers convention in Las Vegas on Wednesday, even before news broke that NSA leaker Edward Snowden had been granted temporary asylum in Russia.

Trust me, Mr. Alexander told the group of corporate cybersecurity specialists and hackers: Reports of NSA analysts roaming unsupervised through the private communications of millions of Americans are greatly exaggerated. The agency, he insisted, goes to great lengths to ensure that every search conducted by its employees is properly authorized and monitored.

Except, apparently, those conducted by Mr. Snowden — and who knows how many others like him. Mr. Snowden had already claimed he could gain access to any piece of information he wanted as a systems administrator of the massive databases of telephone and email communications compiled by the agency. It's no wonder members of the audience openly questioned whether anything the NSA director said could be believed.

That, in a nutshell, is the whole problem the NSA is now facing as a result of Mr. Snowden's revelations. The agency operates in secrecy, and its activities are authorized by a secret court whose legal reasoning and rulings are also secret. Even the congressional committees that are supposed to oversee it meet in secret sessions closed to the public. A heckler asked Mr. Alexander why we should believe him, and the answer is that we can't because there's no way of knowing what the NSA is actually doing.

That's also why Mr. Snowden's leak and subsequent flight to Russia are so hard to countenance, even by people who are troubled by the extent of the NSA surveillance program he revealed. It's one thing to alert Americans that their rights may have been violated by government snooping. It's quite another to in effect hand-deliver four computers worth of classified government information to a foreign power that means us no good.

It's inconceivable that Mr. Snowden didn't know this when he fled first to China and then Russia after leaking details of NSA surveillance programs to The Guardian, one of Great Britain's largest newspapers. And it was pure hubris on his part if he believed those countries didn't have the technical capability to gain access to data in the computers he took with him, with or without his permission. It's likely Russia's grant of temporary asylum is just a way of keeping the U.S. guessing a little longer about what secrets it has already pilfered from the fugitive NSA contractor.

In any case, for the foreseeable future, Mr. Snowden is apparently beyond the reach of U.S. authorities who wish to prosecute him. It remains to be seen what impact his actions will have on U.S.-Russia relations. Reports that President Barack Obama has considered canceling a planned meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin suggest the depth of U.S. displeasure with the Kremlin's decision to grant Mr. Snowden asylum. But that might be simply closing the barn door after the horses have escaped if Russia's security services are already in possession of the information in Mr. Snowden's computers.

General Alexander said at a congressional hearing last month that the NSA's surveillance program had thwarted more than 50 "terrorist events" since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, including at least 10 "homeland-based threats." But when pressed Wednesday, an NSA official testified before a Senate panel that there was only one case that comes close to an example of a terrorist attack that would have occurred if not for the telephone surveillance program.

The NSA's evolving answers and selective disclosures are feeding a growing sense in Congress that the agency is operating without sufficient oversight or control. That view was evident last week, when libertarian Republican conservatives and progressive Democrats joined forces behind a measure to defund the NSA's surveillance activities that fell just seven votes short of passage. The Obama administration needs to offer more than vague promises of reform, and if it doesn't, Congress must step in and impose real limits and oversight.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • A temporary halt to the NSA's domestic spying program

    A temporary halt to the NSA's domestic spying program

    The government's authority to spy on the private phone calls of millions of Americans without their knowledge or consent expired at midnight Sunday, and for first time since the 2001 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, citizens won't have the specter of "Big Brother" looking over their...

  • Taming 'Big Brother'

    Taming 'Big Brother'

    A week after a federal appeals court ruled that the National Security Agency's bulk data collection program was unconstitutional, the Obama administration is urging Congress to approve legislation that would put new limitations on the agency's power to track the private phone calls and emails of...

  • Reining in the surveillance state

    Reining in the surveillance state

    In a sign that the possibility of bipartisan cooperation in Congress is not completely dead, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have moved closer to a consensus on modifying the U.S. Patriot Act, which authorizes the government's secret spying program targeting the private phone calls and email...

  • Spying forever

    Spying forever

    Ever since former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden's revelations last year that the NSA was collecting information on the phone calls and emails of millions of U.S. citizens without their knowledge or consent, lawmakers have been assuring the public they will act to amend the...

  • Intelligence reform bill is important to safeguarding our security and privacy

    Intelligence reform bill is important to safeguarding our security and privacy

    A recent Baltimore Sun editorial described legislation to reform the government's collection of Americans' phone and email data as a sign that "bipartisan cooperation in Congress is not completely dead" ("Reining in the surveillance state," May 5). We'd like to remind The Sun that similar legislation...

  • Congress is not transparent enough about its intelligence oversight [Commentary]

    Congress is not transparent enough about its intelligence oversight [Commentary]

    Members criticize the hardworking employees of the National Security Agency, yet they aren't transparent about their oversight role

  • Unaccountable intelligence agencies [Letter]

    Unaccountable intelligence agencies [Letter]

    Attorney and former CIA officer Matthew Ferraro contends that U.S. intelligence agencies operate within "strict legal controls under the review of lawyers embedded at all levels, inspectors general, courts and Congress" ("The Snowden stigma," June 9).

  • Intelligence community has only itself to blame [Letter]

    Intelligence community has only itself to blame [Letter]

    Again, we have the "blame the media" scenario ("The Snowden stigma," June 9). A former intelligence officer tries awfully hard to make this point: "Edward Snowden's leaks and their media coverage have unfairly maligned the intelligence industry." But blaming the media for reporting the unprofessional,...