Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Editorial

News Opinion Editorial

The $47 million deal

In Annapolis, decisions are rarely made by accident. For better or worse, those who labor in the Maryland General Assembly are creatures of politics, so their behavior is predictable: Legislators look out for their districts, leadership rewards those who fall in line, and dissenters are often left with table scraps.

Recently, it has come to the public's attention that much of the $47.5 million made available this year for school construction projects by the recent alcohol tax increase is going to schools in districts where senators and delegates supported the tax increase. One nonprofit website, MarylandReporter.com, even published a map to demonstrate this to be true.

While we are no fans of divvying up public works projects like they were swag (need, equity and cost-effectiveness would seem like slightly better criteria), it's also hard to find this terribly shocking. The whole point of having a one-year budget for school projects tied to the tax was to provide lawmakers an extra incentive to pass it.

That was not exactly a well-guarded secret. When Baltimore County Executive Kevin Kamenetz was recently questioned by Comptroller Peter Franchot during a Board of Public Works meeting on why so many of his county's latest school projects are on the county's west side, he acknowledged as much. The delegation chose the projects, he noted, to give preferential treatment to tax supporters.

Admittedly, that's not much comfort for families living in the districts of lawmakers who declined to support the legislation raising the sales tax on alcohol from 6 percent to 9 percent. After all, those residents have to pay the tax when they buy liquor, just like everyone else.

But there's another side to this coin. Such considerations are the lubrication by which the legislative process turns. Without those sweeteners, the tax increase might not have passed, and then no Baltimore County schools — home of a tax supporter or not — would be getting help at all.

Notable, too, is that this is for one year only. The amount of money involved is relatively small compared to billions of dollars in outstanding school construction needs statewide, and comes with some sensible limitations. In Baltimore County, for instance, the revenue amounts to $7 million, not nearly enough to build a school.

The money could only be used for projects that were already designated a high priority by the school systems and the Interagency Committee on School Construction, which oversees the state's capital spending on schools. The legislation also gave priority to projects that address older schools and those serving poor communities.

Had lawmakers made this a permanent arrangement, or if the projects financed by the tax were unworthy, this would have been truly outrageous. Readers may recall that groups advocating the alcohol tax increase initially wanted the revenue to help broaden health care coverage and provide services to the developmentally disabled, both especially pressing needs for the state.

Yet here's what would happen in a legislative body that abstains from politics: nothing. Lawmakers would never make the difficult votes. They wouldn't be able to turn to their constituents and say: Yes, I voted for a tax increase, but look at what it bought us — a performing and visual arts center at Annapolis High School or a weight room at Wilde Lake High School or a new roof on Randallstown High School.

Problems arise when legislators go too far, when too much money or too much politics is involved and too little merit. In other words, when a sweetener becomes a truckload of wasteful pork. Such moments of excess happen, but this isn't one of them.

Of course, it's far easier to be "shocked, shocked" at discovering that politics played any role in deciding how tax dollars are spent and rail against the usual suspects. But in reality, self-interested people don't always work toward the common good without a little personal incentive in the mix. It's important to be aware of it so that it doesn't lead to abuse, but in this case, the self-interest is a tool to achieve the common good and not the other way around.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The offal truth

    The offal truth

    On Friday afternoon, my neighbor reported a dead deer in front of his house to Baltimore County animal control. On Saturday night, the deer having not been picked up, I contacted them again. By Monday morning, the deer, being completely disgusting and mostly eaten by flies, vultures and foxes,...

  • No major tax rollbacks?

    No major tax rollbacks?

    Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller told some reporters this week what most State House observers have long suspected — we should not expect some sweeping reduction in taxes during the upcoming legislative session. He also produced a spirited defense of the tax increases approved during Gov....

  • Tax breaks are divisive

    Tax breaks are divisive

    The commentary opposing the proposed tax breaks for corporate donations that help pay for private school tuition by Sara Love of the ACLU of Maryland strikes me as another example of how our new governor acts to ensure his re-election in four years by picking "winners" with his politically-motivated...

  • Rodricks is wrong: Md. tax system is progressive and fair

    Rodricks is wrong: Md. tax system is progressive and fair

    As usual Dan Rodricks gets it wrong. The Maryland tax structure is both progressive and fair ("Beyond race, building a movement for economic fairness," March 30). Let's look at two families A and B. Family A earns $60,000 and B $300,000. For 2014, excluding exemptions and deductions, A pays $2,800...

  • Md. can't keep robbing Peter to pay Paul

    Md. can't keep robbing Peter to pay Paul

    While I applaud the hard work on the state budget put in by House Appropriations Committee Chair Del. Maggie McIntosh and others, I am a little alarmed at their consistent kowtowing to the unions and their annual demands for increased funds despite reports of irresponsible spending.

  • Congress must create a level playing field for bricks-and-mortar businesses and online vendors

    Congress must create a level playing field for bricks-and-mortar businesses and online vendors

    During the next few weeks Congress will have the opportunity to pass e-fairness legislation, which will update our sales tax system and restore fairness to small businesses in our community.

  • Why isn't there enough money to sustain the governor's promised tax cuts?

    Why isn't there enough money to sustain the governor's promised tax cuts?

    Regarding your recent editorial criticizing Gov. Larry Hogan for submitting cuts in education funding, I am among the majority of Marylanders who favored Mr. Hogan in the last election because we supported his proposed budget cuts and call for fiscal responsibility and accountability ("Hogan, Busch...

  • Md. Democrats offer ruinous agenda

    Md. Democrats offer ruinous agenda

    I wonder where the rulers in the Maryland Senate and House of Delegates are going to get the money to fund what Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller described as the Democratic agenda ("Senate panel rewrites Hogan's charter school law," March 26)? I guess they will do what they do every year...

Comments
Loading

73°