Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Editorial

Reining in the NSA

Speaking in Baltimore last week, National Security Agency Director Keith Alexander defended the methods his agency uses to spy on the private phone calls and emails of millions of American citizens, but he did appear to give a little ground to critics of the agency when he said he's "not wedded" to every surveillance program it carries out. "If we can come up with a better way of doing them, we should," he insisted.

That formulation left unclear the meaning of the word "better," however. Does it mean the agency would no longer have to violate the privacy of Americans in order to guard the country against terrorist threats? Or does it mean the agency could simply collect the massive amounts of information it now snatches out of the ether more efficiently?

Mr. Alexander probably wouldn't even be going that far were it not for the most recent revelations about the agency's spying on allied leaders such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel and news last week that the NSA had broken into the data storage centers of global Internet giants such as Google and Yahoo to pilfer messages from their servers abroad. Last week, for the first time, the leaders of those tech companies publicly called for restraints on the agency's activities.

The tech industry's objections were notable because in the past it has sought to cooperate with the NSA's requests for information passing through its networks, rather than confronting the agency. That led to no small embarrassment for the industry recently after documents leaked to the press by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed the companies routinely supplied data on users' private phone calls and email messages to the NSA under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act without notifying their customers.

But we learned last week that in addition to the information the companies were knowingly giving the agency from their servers in this country, the agency had also opened a "back door" to the industry's data storage centers in other countries, through which virtually same information passed. Even top executives of the companies involved were caught by surprise at the scope of the NSA operation that was stealing millions of electronic records from their data servers overseas.

These executives can hardly be reassured by Mr. Alexander's bland promise that everything his agency is doing is perfectly legal. "There is nothing that anyone from NSA or cyber command has done that is wrong," he said last week. "From where I sit, we're doing everything we can to do this right. We hold ourselves accountable." But an agency that holds itself accountable only to itself isn't accountable at all.

It's encouraging that the tech industry's leaders are finally pushing back against some of the NSA's more outrageous claims, and given the recent revelations they probably have little choice but to do so if they want to retain the confidence of the customers who entrust them with their personal information. Ironically, they share much of the blame for the violations of privacy on their networks because much of the user data they collect to target the advertising that generates their companies' profits is the same information the NSA covets. If they weren't collecting the data, the NSA wouldn't be able to steal it so easily.

That's one reason the path going forward remains somewhat unclear. There are a number of proposals being considered by Congress that, in various ways, would restrict NSA surveillance programs in this country, but none of them address NSA collection operations in other countries. Moreover, there are legal questions regarding whether the Constitution's Fourth Amendment protections against illegal searches and seizures even apply to operations conducted overseas

That's why privacy advocates are deeply skeptical anything will change even if the bills become law. Legislation could simply offer the illusion of narrowing the NSA's ability to snoop on Americans by imposing more oversight and transparency on the agency while in fact simply legalizing the bulk collection of U.S. citizens' phone and electronic traffic. That's hardly likely to make the NSA more accountable to anyone, let alone the public.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • A temporary halt to the NSA's domestic spying program

    A temporary halt to the NSA's domestic spying program

    The government's authority to spy on the private phone calls of millions of Americans without their knowledge or consent expired at midnight Sunday, and for first time since the 2001 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, citizens won't have the specter of "Big Brother" looking over their...

  • Taming 'Big Brother'

    Taming 'Big Brother'

    A week after a federal appeals court ruled that the National Security Agency's bulk data collection program was unconstitutional, the Obama administration is urging Congress to approve legislation that would put new limitations on the agency's power to track the private phone calls and emails of...

  • Reining in the surveillance state

    Reining in the surveillance state

    In a sign that the possibility of bipartisan cooperation in Congress is not completely dead, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have moved closer to a consensus on modifying the U.S. Patriot Act, which authorizes the government's secret spying program targeting the private phone calls and email...

  • Spying forever

    Spying forever

    Ever since former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden's revelations last year that the NSA was collecting information on the phone calls and emails of millions of U.S. citizens without their knowledge or consent, lawmakers have been assuring the public they will act to amend the...

  • Intelligence reform bill is important to safeguarding our security and privacy

    Intelligence reform bill is important to safeguarding our security and privacy

    A recent Baltimore Sun editorial described legislation to reform the government's collection of Americans' phone and email data as a sign that "bipartisan cooperation in Congress is not completely dead" ("Reining in the surveillance state," May 5). We'd like to remind The Sun that similar legislation...

  • Congress is not transparent enough about its intelligence oversight [Commentary]

    Congress is not transparent enough about its intelligence oversight [Commentary]

    Members criticize the hardworking employees of the National Security Agency, yet they aren't transparent about their oversight role

  • Unaccountable intelligence agencies [Letter]

    Unaccountable intelligence agencies [Letter]

    Attorney and former CIA officer Matthew Ferraro contends that U.S. intelligence agencies operate within "strict legal controls under the review of lawyers embedded at all levels, inspectors general, courts and Congress" ("The Snowden stigma," June 9).

  • Intelligence community has only itself to blame [Letter]

    Intelligence community has only itself to blame [Letter]

    Again, we have the "blame the media" scenario ("The Snowden stigma," June 9). A former intelligence officer tries awfully hard to make this point: "Edward Snowden's leaks and their media coverage have unfairly maligned the intelligence industry." But blaming the media for reporting the unprofessional,...