Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Editorial

News Opinion Editorial

How to make Md.'s taxes more competitive

In his remarks to the Greater Baltimore Committee's annual meeting Wednesday night, T. Rowe Price Chairman Brian C. Rogers noted a contradiction in how the world sees Maryland as a place to do business. On the one hand, it is universally recognized for its top-ranked school systems and universities, skilled workforce, research activity, potential for innovation, and great quality of life. On the other, it frequently winds up toward the bottom of rankings of business competitiveness — most recently, by CEO Magazine — largely because of our tax system and regulatory environment.

Mr. Rogers, who is also chairman of the GBC, had a simple prescription: "Making Maryland more competitive requires that our tax system become more competitive." The "Brian Rogers theory of taxation," such as it is, he said, is that we should be taxing more the things we want less of — cigarettes, alcohol and perhaps gasoline — and taxing less the things we want more of. What we want more of, he said, are jobs, and one way to encourage that is by lowering the corporate income tax rate, he said.

Putting aside the disconnect between job creation and corporate profits in recent years, it is certainly true that Maryland's corporate tax rate of 8.25 percent is higher than some surrounding states — notably Virginia, where the rate is 6 percent — and that we have often been on the losing end of companies' decisions on where to locate in the region. Mr. Rogers pointed to a recent decision by Raytheon to locate a cybersecurity facility in Northern Virginia despite Maryland's substantial assets in that industry.

But Mr. Rogers also noted that the key for Maryland's future prosperity isn't in luring big companies to the state — "Sorry, folks, Pfizer isn't going to move to Baltimore," he said — but in nurturing innovative start-up companies that will be the major employers of tomorrow.

There is a strategy the state could employ to lower the taxes on those sorts of firms without throwing the state's budget out of balance or shifting more of the tax burden from corporations to individuals. But it would require abandoning another tenet of the GBC agenda: opposition to combined reporting.

Earlier in the evening, GBC President Donald C. Fry listed the defeat of combined reporting legislation in this year's General Assembly session as one of the organization's key accomplishments. But the group's reasons for opposing it are shaky, and the GBC and other business organizations would do well to rally behind a proposal to adopt that method of calculating corporate income for tax purposes in exchange for a cut in the corporate tax rate.

Combined reporting seeks to more accurately calculate a corporation's economic activity in a state by considering all its related entities together rather than separately. In general, it makes it more difficult for a multi-state conglomerate to hide its profits in states with lower (or no) corporate income tax rates. It is a decades-old idea that is law in a majority of states (including some of those that are consistently ranked among the most business friendly).

Mr. Fry testified against a combined reporting bill in this year's General Assembly session, even though the legislation would have cut a variety of business fees in half. He said he based his opposition on a recommendation by the Maryland Business Tax Reform Commission that "enacting combined reporting was not advisable at this time." That's not exactly true; the commission report, issued in December 2010, found that enacting combined reporting was not advisable at that time, meaning the 2011 legislative session. Its reasoning was that the transition to combined reporting would be complicated for many businesses, the switch would create winners and losers, and the effect would be to introduce "uncertainty at a time when the economy is struggling to recover from the recent recession."

Maryland's economic health has, fortunately, improved since then. And while combined reporting isn't simple, neither is our current corporate tax system. Maryland has enacted its own laws in recent years to cut down on tax avoidance strategies. Wouldn't it be simpler if instead we adopted the Multistate Tax Commission's model combined reporting system? And the current tax system also creates winners and losers — the winners are those that can pay lawyers and accountants to shield their income from Maryland taxes, and the losers are those that can't.

Estimates vary on how much combined reporting would increase Maryland corporate tax receipts. Research by the comptroller's office suggests that it changes from year to year, but the Department of Legislative Services projects that it would net the state an extra $60 million or more a year. Based on those figures, Maryland could drop its corporate tax rate to about 7.6 percent without losing any revenue. The inconvenience of learning a new system would be temporary, but the lower rate would be forever. If the GBC and other business groups think the corporate tax rate is hurting competitiveness, that should be a trade they're willing to make.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland has what business needs

    Maryland has what business needs

    Recent letters have trashed Maryland as a business friendly state. As the founder of one of Maryland's largest engineering firms employing about 1,000 engineers and scientists, we have found Maryland to be the ideal place to locate and grow a business. Businesses in the 21st century seek good markets,...

  • Better care for less

    Better care for less

    Any conversation about Maryland's new waiver to Medicare's reimbursement rules can quickly devolve into mind-numbing complexity. But Gary L. Attman, the CEO of FutureCare, can sum up its effect quite simply. He was recently headed to a meeting with a hospital president but arrived late because...

  • Red Line revival? [Poll]

    Red Line revival? [Poll]

    Do Baltimore leaders have any chance of changing Gov. Hogan's mind regarding the city's now-defunct Red Line project?

  • Why we must fight economic apartheid in America

    Why we must fight economic apartheid in America

    Almost lost in the wave of responses to the Supreme Court decisions last week upholding the Affordable Care Act and allowing gays and lesbians to marry was the significance of the court's decision on housing discrimination.

  • Baltimore's homeless: out of sight, out of mind?

    Baltimore's homeless: out of sight, out of mind?

    On a recent morning, the city of Baltimore once again tried to shut the poor out of our minds and drive them from the mainstream of our society — in this case, from the verge of Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, where homeless folks were taking refuge from the elements and finding comfort in a...

  • Immigrant soldiers won the U.S. Civil War

    Immigrant soldiers won the U.S. Civil War

    In the summer of 1861, an American diplomat in Turin, Italy, looked out the window of the U.S. legation to see hundreds of young men forming a sprawling line. Some wore red shirts, emblematic of the Garibaldini known for pointing one finger in the air and shouting l'Italia Unità! (Italy United!)....

  • Black churches burning

    Black churches burning

    In the week following the murderous rampage in which nine black parishioners were shot and killed at a church in Charleston, S.C., a series of mysterious fires at African-American churches across the South has revived the specter of racist violence against a core institution of the black community....

  • Reinventing Baltimore's schools

    Reinventing Baltimore's schools

    In 2000, Don Hutchinson, then president of the Greater Baltimore Committee, was part of a group of Baltimore's business leaders asked to review and critique the city school system's master plan, an annually updated document.

Comments
Loading

72°