Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Editorial

One week and counting

Between Egypt and disgraced politicians, August has proven itself a more robust month for news than usual this year, yet there's always room in the summer doldrums for the wacky and off-beat. And for generations, few individuals have proven themselves better suited to provide that brand of comic relief than the men who have served as Maryland's comptroller.

Whether it was Louis L. Goldstein's tireless campaigning or his cheerful but grammatically-challenged signature send-off, "God bless y'all real good," or even William Donald Schaefer's diatribes against the world or generally bizarre behavior, Maryland comptrollers have a tradition of quirky entertainment. How comforting to recognize that Peter Franchot, the man who has held the office since 2007, is continuing this proud tradition.

The latest evidence of this, of course, is a 12-page report issued by Mr. Franchot claiming that if Maryland's schools would simply start students back after Labor Day instead of one week earlier, the state would reap substantial economic rewards: $74.3 million in direct economic activity and $7.7 million in state and local tax revenue.

Where would this newfound wealth come from? It is the comptroller's belief that Marylanders would take a lot more vacation days and spend them at places like Ocean City and the Maryland State Fair in Timonium. It would provide, in the comptroller's own words, "the chance for families to spend precious time together and build lifelong memories."

And all that as a result of starting school on Sept. 3 instead of Aug. 26. We would be skeptical of the methodology used by the Bureau of Revenue Estimates, but the one-page description of methodology in the report is so slight on how these calculations were actually made (aside from using "models" and "data"), that critiquing it would be impossible.

Instead, let's assume Mr. Franchot is correct. Maryland's gross domestic product is along the order of $301 billion, so $74.3 million would potentially add something between a minuscule and barely discernible amount to it. (That's 0.0025 percent, to be precise.) Meanwhile, school systems across the state would have to completely rewrite their calendars to either toss out existing holidays or teacher training and planning days or else extend the 180-day school year deeper into June. This would be problematic for any number of reasons, most glaringly because of the fixed dates of standardized testing and the need to cover certain curriculum by a certain date.

Add to that the need for days off for planning, for teacher education, to fulfill contracts and to allow parents to take vacations at other times of the year, and what you would have is a considerable burden for school systems from Ocean City to Deep Creek Lake. How curious that if this would such a good idea — and Ocean City so desperately needs it to staff its late-summer tourism attractions — that even the Atlantic beach resort's own Worcester County school system starts classes in August, not September.

Indeed, it isn't hard to find a lot of neighbors who see the advantage in an August 26 start date for public schools. That's when students in the District of Columbia go back. Same with students in York, Pa. and New Castle, Del. Classes at Towson University start in August as do students at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. Shouldn't the comptroller get on their case?

What makes this whole exercise especially silly is that what Maryland's elected leaders (including its chief tax collector) ought to be asking is, why do public schools still take off so much time in the summer? The far more important question — to the state's economy and well-being — is whether Maryland is educating its children to the highest possible standard.

Summer vacation is a vestige of the nation's agricultural past. Year-round schooling might be more effective. Studies show students who attend school year-round do as well or better than their peers in the traditional schedule. Even some business leaders have advocated for it as a means to boost employment opportunities for young people beyond the summer months.

When it comes to public education, our sole focus ought to be on producing better outcomes, not on economic chump change. As amusing as it may be to see Mr. Franchot advocate for this misguided crusade annually, it's a bit of a guilty pleasure. Ultimately, the quality of Maryland's public schools is serious stuff, and school systems don't need such sideshow distractions.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Fitness trackers [Poll]
    Fitness trackers [Poll]
  • Politicizing the chancellor
    Politicizing the chancellor

    When University System of Maryland Chancellor William E. "Brit" Kirwan announced that he planned to retire, the state's Board of Regents hired a firm to conduct a nationwide search to recruit a top-notch academic leader for what is and should be a plum post in American higher education. The...

  • Let the NFL's air out
    Let the NFL's air out

    Professional sport being a gentlemanly pursuit in which participants would surely step forward at the slightest possibility that even the most minor of rules had been bent, let alone broken, it's difficult to imagine anyone associated with the New England Patriots had a hand in deflating the...

  • The power to pardon
    The power to pardon

    The fate of the last four inmates on Maryland's death row was finally resolved this week when outgoing Gov. Martin O'Malley, in one of his final official acts, commuted their death sentences to life without the possibility of parole. It was certainly in keeping with his steadfast opposition...

  • Chartering success
    Chartering success

    A new report by the Abell Foundation concludes that Maryland needs to dramatically increase the state's efforts to recruit successful charter school organizations in order to boost achievement levels among low-income minority students in underperforming public schools. It's a finding that has...

  • A path forward for responsible gas shale regulations
    A path forward for responsible gas shale regulations

    Editor's note: This piece has been updated with the author's correct email address. 

Comments
Loading