Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionEditorial

Thumbs down on Keystone

Upstream Oil and Gas ActivitiesElectionsPetroleum IndustryRepublican PartyTransCanada Corporation

President Barack Obama's State Department is not going to issue a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline in its current form, and for this, even the project's most ardent supporters should be grateful. That includesTransCanada Corp. which was reportedly considering pulling its application for the pipeline to avoid further partisan bickering over the original route.

That such an enormously complex and environmentally sensitive project came down to a 60-day review was the result of political mischief-making by Republicans, who included the Feb. 21 deadline in the payroll tax extension signed into law last month. But if TransCanada is to reroute the pipeline (as company officials had already said they intend) and that route isn't even known yet, how could the State Department or White House have possibly endorsed it?

If Republicans had hoped to embarrass Mr. Obama with an election year "gotcha" — forcing him to choose between unions that support the Keystone project and environmental groups that oppose it — they made a serious miscalculation. The greater embarrassment is on the part of the GOP lawmakers who placed partisan gamesmanship ahead of the national interest.

The president had originally sought to push the timetable for a final decision until after the election in early 2013. If TransCanada now chooses to submit a new application — with an alternative route that bypasses the Sandhills of Nebraska — that may move the timetable even farther into the future. Those who are disappointed with that result can blame the political machinations of the GOP.

Keystone supporters insist that the $7 billion pipeline from Alberta to Texas would create as many as 20,000 (temporary) jobs and allow the U.S. to get more of its petroleum from a stable, democratic neighbor rather than less friendly regimes in the Middle East, Latin America and elsewhere. Of course, it would also have enabled TransCanada to get a better price for its oil than it does currently and thus would do little for Americans seeking lower prices at the pump.

But that's not the only cost to be weighed. Tapping Canada's tar sands is antithetical to sensible climate change policy. Not only would it promote further dependence on oil, but making matters worse is the inconvenient reality that extracting petroleum from tar sands releases substantial amounts of greenhouse gas emissions even before the first gallon of gasoline or diesel fuel is burned.

In its current form, the pipeline also threatened the Ogallala aquifer, the main source of drinking water in the upper Midwest. Even setting aside the tremendous ramifications raised by the massive pipeline on global climate change, the potential damage posed to Ogallala by a pipeline oil spill was an unacceptable risk to a critical U.S. resource.

Make no mistake, the Obama administration's choice to reject the TransCanada application — the only sensible one available under the peculiar circumstances — is not going to kill this controversial project. The appetite for oil in the U.S. and elsewhere is too great to assume that it will never be extracted from Canadian tar sands.

But at least it means there will be an opportunity for a sensible and complete review of whatever comes next. As the blather surrounding the Republican primaries has already demonstrated, serious debate over important public policy is hard to come by in presidential election years.

Of course, this won't keep Mitt Romney and others for bashing President Obama for doing the responsible thing and falsely portraying the decision as anti-jobs and anti-American. But at least that reveals what little regard such detractors have for the American people who surely would never want their government to blindly approve such a massive project without even knowing its route.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Upstream Oil and Gas ActivitiesElectionsPetroleum IndustryRepublican PartyTransCanada Corporation
  • Our government is broken [Letter]
    Our government is broken [Letter]

    Canada has a shale oil supply that could have reduced U.S. reliance of oil imports from the Middle East, provided thousands of American jobs and ultimately lowered the price of gasoline for American citizens. But President Barack Obama has held the project hostage. Not the House of...

  • The real reason Obama hasn't approved Keystone [Letter]
    The real reason Obama hasn't approved Keystone [Letter]

    There are so many falsehoods and inaccuracies in your editorial that I cannot rebut them point by point ("The Keystone delay," April 22). I would rather present the facts about why the Keystone pipeline should have been approved years ago and why President Barack Obama's...

  • Keystone delay is all politics [Letter]
    Keystone delay is all politics [Letter]

    Here is what President Barack Obama said on Good Friday when he announced that he was again, after four years, delaying a decision on the Keystone XL Pipeline until after the election:

  • The Keystone delay [Editorial]
    The Keystone delay [Editorial]

    Our view: Choice to temporarily defer a decision on controversial oil pipeline is a rational, albeit politically convenient, one for the White House

  • Keystone XL is one more hole in a sinking ship [Letter]
    Keystone XL is one more hole in a sinking ship [Letter]

    On what basis did the U.S. State Department conclude that the Keystone XL pipeline project is relatively benign in regard to greenhouse gas?

  • Climate change toadies
    Climate change toadies

    While reading the front page of The Sun the article on the loss of amphibians ("Alarming U.S. decline in environment's sentinels," May 23), I heard on the radio that Congress is trying to assure construction of the Alberta tar sands pipeline.

  • Oil spills and Keystone
    Oil spills and Keystone

    Our view: Pipeline spill in Arkansas a reminder of the risks posed by Keystone XL — and the little value the project poses for the United States

  • Who would follow our example on Keystone?
    Who would follow our example on Keystone?

    While many have long seen America as the global bad boy, everybody likes Canada. If Uncle Sam tucks his pack of Marlboros under his T-shirt sleeve and plays by his own rules, the Canadian moose -- or whatever their Uncle Sam equivalent is -- always wears his blue blazer and school tie and...

Comments
Loading