Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99


News Opinion Editorial

Policing internal affairs

The Baltimore Police Department's announcement that Maj. Nathan Warfield has been removed from his post as commander of the internal affairs division doesn't quite add up. The department issued a news release about the move last night, after The Sun's Justin Fenton had asked questions about photos on Mr. Warfield's Facebook page showing him at a party and at a basketball tournament with Officer Daniel G. Redd, who is under indictment on drug charges, and with another man, Sam Brown, who is charged in a separate heroin distribution conspiracy. As is typical, the department provided no indication for why it was making this move. But given the perplexing questions this case raises and the recent scandals in the department — not just the arrest of Officer Redd but also the indictments and guilty pleas in a towing kickback scheme that may have involved as many as 50 officers — the department needs to say more, or it is going to lose the public's trust.

The case of Major Warfield is a question of who knew what and when. Although Officer Redd was only indicted this month and had been on the streets until then, the department evidently had suspicions about him for years — enough so that he was passed over for promotions. Major Warfield had been his commander in the Northwest District before being promoted to head internal affairs in 2009. It is hard to imagine that, if police commanders had suspicions about an officer in his district, Mr. Warfield wouldn't have known it. It is harder to believe that he hadn't known about it once he was promoted to internal affairs. The fact that he still had the photos on his Facebook page after Officer Redd was arrested is beyond odd.

It's possible that there's an innocent explanation. Perhaps Major Warfield knew about Officer Redd — who, according to the FBI, is accused of actually dealing drugs in the parking lot of the station house where he was assigned — and was maintaining the pretense of friendship to avoid tipping him off that federal investigators were closing in on him. But if so, why remove him from internal affairs? And why was Major Warfield also pictured arm-in-arm with Mr. Brown, who in the 1990s was charged (though ultimately not prosecuted) with first-degree murder, handgun violations and assault with the intent to rape? Two sets of Facebook photos show Major Warfield with both men at two separate events. He certainly shouldn't be considered guilty by association, but the association does at least require some explanation.

Baltimore has been buffeted by a series of scandals in recent months. Even beyond the guilty verdict against Mayor Sheila Dixon and the no contest plea to campaign finance violations byCouncilwoman Helen Holton, we've had the towing scandal, reports of Public Works employees drinking and gambling on the job, another worker bilking the city of $55,000 by falsifying time sheets, suspected cheating on the emergency medical services exam, and now the case of Officer Redd.

Police Commissioner Frederick H. Bealefeld III has said that rooting out misconduct in the department is a top priority, and we have been willing to believe that the recent pattern reflected greater vigilance against wrongdoing as opposed to a sudden increase in corruption. But these new questions about the very person whose job was to root out bad actors in the police department make it more difficult to maintain that benefit of the doubt.

What is needed here is greater transparency. Mr. Bealefeld has to start answering questions about what's been going on in internal affairs — not just in regard to Major Warfield's relationship with Messrs. Redd and Brown but also about the division's efficacy in general, which is difficult to gauge given the paucity of information that the department has released about its investigations since Mr. Warfield took command. The nature of ongoing investigations and the department's partnership with federal investigators does present limitations on what Mr. Bealefeld can say, but he has to give us something. He and other city officials have asked us to trust that they are working harder than ever to police themselves. But trust without a basis of evidence is blind faith, and that we cannot give.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Some question top leadership in recent city police scandals

    Some question top leadership in recent city police scandals

    Bealefeld appears to weather crises

  • Black churches burning

    Black churches burning

    In the week following the murderous rampage in which nine black parishioners were shot and killed at a church in Charleston, S.C., a series of mysterious fires at African-American churches across the South has revived the specter of racist violence against a core institution of the black community....

  • Reinventing Baltimore's schools

    Reinventing Baltimore's schools

    In 2000, Don Hutchinson, then president of the Greater Baltimore Committee, was part of a group of Baltimore's business leaders asked to review and critique the city school system's master plan, an annually updated document.

  • Clean air gets scrubbed

    Clean air gets scrubbed

    What is the value of being able to eat fish? What price should be put on birth defects that show up in a human fetus? What about the cost of people dying much earlier than they should have if not for an encounter with a toxic chemical?

  • Supreme Court sides with the people, not the politicians

    Supreme Court sides with the people, not the politicians

    Today the Supreme Court reinforced the principle that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around, in upholding an Arizona law that puts the task of drawing congressional district boundaries in the hands of an independent commission rather than the legislature. Maryland,...

  • Life lessons in 'Inside Out'

    Life lessons in 'Inside Out'

    My eight-year-old daughter, Anne, and I had a wonderful time viewing the new Disney/Pixar film "Inside Out." As many parents of a young children know by now, the film tells the story of Riley Andersen, a girl who moves from Minnesota to San Francisco and must cope with the transition to a new home,...