Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Editorial
News Opinion Editorial

Licensed to drive [Editorial]

Last week, Maryland joined a handful of other states that allow undocumented immigrants to drive legally on state roads, to register vehicles and to buy auto insurance. That's good public policy because it not only will make the state's roads safer for everyone who uses them but also help those living in the country without legal permission achieve a measure of self-sufficiency. Thousands of residents who previously either feared getting behind the wheel at all or who risked arrest or worse for driving without a license reportedly are now lining up to take the MVA written exam and road test.

It should be obvious to anyone who depends on a car for getting back and forth to work, ferrying schoolchildren or running errands that the safety of everyone on the road is increased when all motorists have had to demonstrate a minimum level of competence in driving skills and knowledge of traffic laws. Protecting public safety is, after all, the main reason states require drivers to be licensed; the fact that government-issued licenses are also widely used as photo ID cards is an important but secondary consideration in deciding who can legally drive.

That is why the state legislature approved the creation of a two-tiered licensing system in Maryland last year that allows the state to confer driving privileges on people regardless of their immigration status. Previously, state-issued identification cards had to meet a variety of strict federal security standards, including one that mandated licenses be issued only to people who could prove they were in the country legally. But relying on the Motor Vehicle Administration to enforce immigration laws was never a wise policy. Under Maryland's system, applicants who can't document their immigration status can still obtain a valid drivers license, albeit one that can't be used to verify their identity as airline passengers or visitors to federal facilities.

What the licenses can do, however, is help ensure that people who want to drive on the state's roads meet minimum safety standards and that their vehicles are registered and insured. Undocumented immigrants are less likely to leave the scene of an accident or attempt to flee from police if they know a traffic stop won't automatically get them deported for driving without a license, and that will greatly reduce the hazard such drivers pose to other motorists as well as make life easier for immigrants who are dependent on cars to get where they need to go.

Some lawmakers vigorously opposed the change when the measure was debated in the legislature last year. Most of their objections stemmed from concerns that granting driving privileges to undocumented immigrants would instantly turn Maryland into a "sanctuary state" and lead to an even larger influx of people living in the country illegally. There were also dire predictions that the integrity of the state's drivers licenses would be undermined and that a flood of counterfeit Maryland IDs would threaten the country's ability to guard against foreign terrorist threats.

Such concerns are unfounded; there's nothing in the experience of other states that have adopted similar systems to suggest that they either have prompted a huge influx of immigrants or that they have made residents less safe. Such objections are little more than the product of anti-immigrant hysteria, often whipped up for partisan advantage.

The 11 million undocumented immigrants in the country aren't going anywhere, but many of them are going to end up driving regardless of whether they are licensed. Maryland's system admittedly may be less than ideal; it would be far better for Congress to finally enact comprehensive immigration reform that allows a path to citizenship and legal residence for undocumented immigrants. But until that happens, the state's two-tiered system may represent the best compromise available that acknowledges the reality of the state's situation and helps secure the safety of its residents.

To respond to this editorial, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • U.S. not alone in birthright citizenship

    U.S. not alone in birthright citizenship

    The local front man for anti-immigrant hysteria thinks it is time to change the 14th Amendment and myriad Supreme Court precedents to exclude children of non-citizens born in the United States from birthright citizenship ("Illegal immigration is costly," Aug. 24). He neglects to mention that the...

  • Don't cheerlead for foreign worker visa expansion

    Don't cheerlead for foreign worker visa expansion

    I am not comfortable with the H-2B foreign worker visa program, yet The Sun reported a flattering, one-sided report on its expansion, giving credit to Sen. Barbara Mikulski for "cutting red tape" to once again rescue her major campaign donors in the landscaping and seafood industries ("Md. seafood...

  • What is immigration costing Md.?

    What is immigration costing Md.?

    I read with interest The Sun's article, "More school money sought" (Jan. 12). The article notes that the superintendent of Baltimore County Public Schools is requesting an 8.7 percent increase in the school budget. In part, the increase is needed due to "an influx of children in need" and "to hire...

  • Let's show compassion for young immigrants [Letter]

    Let's show compassion for young immigrants [Letter]

    Maryland saw an influx of unaccompanied children from Central America this summer. Today, we have more than 3,000 of these kids. I'm glad Maryland is harboring, them but each has a sword of Damocles over his or her head ("Montgomery Co. is latest to limit immigration detainers," Oct. 7). As Customs...

  • Trump is right about immigration

    Trump is right about immigration

    It comes as no surprise that The Sun's editorial board has jumped on the anti-Donald Trump bandwagon trumpeting the usual racist label when they have no other legitimate counter argument ("The summer of hate," July 13). The editors obviously have not read nor comprehended the scope of the 1996...

  • Immigration and the English language

    Immigration and the English language

    Regarding your recent editorial on immigration, how can anyone trust the ultra-liberal ACLU and the American Immigration Council to provide unbiased, factual information ("A misguided view of immigrants," Aug. 18)?

  • Immigration standoff

    Immigration standoff

    There is something truly unsavory about targeting for deportation immigrant children — particularly those known by the shorthand of "dreamers" who were brought to this country at a young age by their parents — but that was the priority of House Republicans last week. Not all in the GOP went along,...

  • We need data, not guesses on the economics of immigration

    We need data, not guesses on the economics of immigration

    John Fritze and Luke Broadwater's article "Baltimore weighs in on immigration lawsuit" ("Jan. 24) does an excellent job of identifying some of the potential economic pros and cons of undocumented immigrants living in our communities. It discusses "a federal lawsuit that has divided state and local...

Comments
Loading
81°