Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Editorial

Hopkins eventually gets it right on anti-abortion group

The bright young people in student government at the Johns Hopkins University no doubt pride themselves on their openness to a diversity of views and their commitment to the free exchange of ideas. That's why the school's Student Government Association's Judiciary Committee was right to overturn the student Senate's decision to deny official recognition to a student-led anti-abortion group. It's on just such contentious issues as abortion that vigorous public discussion and a healthy respect for the views of others are most needed, and we hope that's the lesson Hopkins' student government will ultimately draw from this imbroglio.

This was never really a question of First Amendment rights. Hopkins is a private institution that is perfectly entitled to set limits on the types of views it endorses and their manner of expression. Furthermore, Voice for Life would have been perfectly free to espouse its views whether it was recognized or not. The group plans to gather in front of abortion clinics near the university's Homewood campus in hopes of persuading women seeking to end a pregnancy to reconsider their decision. Whether it had the right to assemble peacefully, speak or pass out literature was never in doubt.

What the issue really came down to was whether the Hopkins Student Government Association should withhold official recognition of Voice for Life as a legitimate campus organization solely because it disagrees with the group's position on abortion. Recognition by the student government confers certain privileges that make it easier for groups to meet on campus and raise funds for their activities, but they can still operate without it. The only thing the student government association's refusal to recognize Voice for Life really did was to publicly declare its strong disapproval of the ideas espoused by the group and stigmatize them as unworthy of consideration.

There's no doubt many Hopkins students — particularly young women who fear being harassed by the group — consider any challenge to abortion rights as a personal affront that threatens their control over their bodies as well as their dignity. We, too, support abortion rights, and we are concerned about the flurry of efforts in state legislatures this year to enact new restrictions that severely limit women's access to abortion services in ways that clearly are punitive and probably unconstitutional as well. Voice for Life's website links to pages with graphic images of dead fetuses that paint women who seek abortions as criminals and killers, so it's little wonder some young people are both disgusted and deeply offended by the group's tactics.

What student government leaders need to keep in mind, however, is that the unfettered exchange of ideas that characterize a vibrant intellectual community like Hopkins necessarily involves views some people will disagree with expressed in a way that makes them uncomfortable. That's the way it is in the real world, and the SGA members would do themselves and their educations no favors by seeking to shelter themselves now.

What students at Hopkins are getting out of the dust-up over Voice for Life's activities is a crash course in the messy, disruptive and often painful process of making a democracy work. These are not easy questions they are being asked to resolve. They go to the heart of people's most deeply held moral, ethical and religious beliefs, and they test everyone's capacity for self-examination as well as their tolerance for opposing views. Above all, it's a discussion that forces them to think more clearly and debate the issues more incisively, and that's one of the things we expect a college education to prepare young people to do. Denying recognition of Voice for Life was a mistake, but it was a valuable one because it forced the students, without the interference of the university administration, to work through the conflicting values posed by the situation. It's good that the students eventually came to the right decision, but more important is the lesson they learned along the way.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Anti-abortion student group at Hopkins will be fully recognized

    Anti-abortion student group at Hopkins will be fully recognized

    Student Government Association committee overturned decision to block Voice for Life group

  • The Iran nuclear agreement will make America and Israel safer

    The Iran nuclear agreement will make America and Israel safer

    In late July, The Associated: Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore and the Baltimore Jewish Council issued statements urging Congress to oppose the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on Iran's Nuclear Program.

  • Lieberman: Obama must reveal side deals on Iran nuclear program

    Lieberman: Obama must reveal side deals on Iran nuclear program

    Members of Congress must know more about secret side arrangements between the International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran before they vote on the proposed nuclear agreement with Tehran. Why won't the Obama administration reveal the topics that the various side deals touch upon?

  • The poster state for climate change

    The poster state for climate change

    With all due respect to Ohio Republicans and their collective affection for the late William McKinley, whose second term in the White House was cut short 114 years ago by an anarchist's bullets, the most important event of President Barack Obama's trip to Alaska was not the return of Mount Denali...

  • Freddie Gray case: Order in the court

    Freddie Gray case: Order in the court

    For the first several days after Freddie Gray's death in April, thousands of Baltimoreans peacefully took to the streets to protest his treatment by police and to demand broader changes in neighborhoods like the one where he lived. Whatever it was that led to the rioting that followed — outside...

  • Trump the Barbarian

    Trump the Barbarian

    Whether he is fielding questions from the press or talking to voters, Donald Trump is consistently comfortable in his own florid skin and flamboyant hair. To the amazement of veteran journalists, political operatives and the other Republican candidates, that is making him a very formidable contender...