Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Editorial

Baltimore homestead tax credits: Gross inequality

A homeowner should not pay more in property taxes than his two neighbors put together for their nearly identical homes. But that's exactly what Sun reporters Scott Calvert and Jamie Smith Hopkins found in a comprehensive and unprecedented review of Baltimore City's homestead tax break program.

And it's not an isolated incident. A program designed to be a temporary fix for soaring home prices in the 1970s has turned into a leviathan that perpetuates inequality, robs the city of more than $100 million a year in revenue and helps lock Baltimore into a property tax rate that is nearly twice as high as any other jurisdiction in the state.

It is a clear hindrance to Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's goal of attracting 10,000 new families to the city during the next decade. The credit works by limiting to 4 percent the annual increase in a homeowner's property tax bill. That means people who have owned their homes for decades, during a time when city housing values have more than doubled, may wind up paying just a small fraction of what they would otherwise owe. But new homeowners pay full freight. The same is true in suburban counties, but their lower overall tax rates make it much easier to buy there.

Still, Ms. Rawlings-Blake has no interest in changing the program. Why? Because doing so could have the effect of increasing tax bills for elderly or low-income homeowners and wind up forcing them out of houses they have occupied for decades. The fact that the biggest beneficiaries of the program happen to be some of the city's wealthiest residents is, evidently, just an unfortunate side effect. "I don't think that increasing property taxes on people who have lived here for a long time is going to help us grow," Rawlings-Blake spokesman Ryan O'Doherty told Ms. Smith Hopkins and Mr. Calvert.

But leaving the system in place as-is won't help the city grow either. Combined with the high tax rate, it has the effect of limiting mobility within the city because the tax break resets to zero when a home is sold. A young couple who find that their narrow rowhouse won't do anymore now that they have kids might discover it makes more sense to buy in Parkville than in Hamilton. Empty nesters looking to downsize could wind up paying more taxes on a downtown condo than a Roland Park Victorian. The system doesn't so much help people stay in their homes as it shackles them.

Mr. Calvert and Ms. Smith Hopkins discovered other major problems with the program. It is riddled with errors — mistyped numbers or missed renovations can improperly reduce tax bills by thousands, and as the pair previously reported, hundreds of homes listed by the city as vacant and delinquent are still getting homestead tax breaks. And since the Maryland Constitution requires that property taxes be applied uniformly, it is almost certainly illegal.

The cap was tangentially part of the conversation about property taxes during the last mayoral campaign, and City Councilman Carl Stokes — himself the recipient of an 84 percent discount on his property taxes due to the homestead credit — is advocating for reform. He proposes increasing the cap on annual tax increases to 10 percent — the maximum allowed under state law — and using the money to reduce the overall tax rate. A city property tax commission created by former Mayor Sheila Dixon suggested the same idea in 2007. But the Rawlings-Blake administration has rejected the idea, saying it wouldn't generate enough money to fund a meaningful drop in the property tax rate and would hurt some longtime city residents who would be priced out of their homes.

That is a legitimate concern. But leaving the system in place forever will only increase the inequities and make the problems they cause more difficult to untangle. Mr. Stokes' idea, or some variation on it, could help to gradually restore equity in the system and put Baltimore in a position to do more to reduce property taxes for everyone. It would also be worth considering whether a program could be structured to specifically assist low-income homeowners and those on fixed incomes. The mayor is right to want to prevent people from being forced to sell their homes because of surging property tax bills, but she should work to find a way to do it that doesn't also hand thousands of dollars a year to people who don't need it and hinder her effort to make Baltimore grow again.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Muddled thinking on the Homestead tax credit

    The three letters to the editor published in the December 27 edition of The Sun dealing with the recent series on the Homestead Property Tax Credit lead me to believe that either I or the writers of these letters are totally out of touch with what is going on in America, not just in Baltimore and...

  • Fix the inequities of the homestead property tax credit

    As a lifelong resident of Baltimore City, I purchased a shell in Upper Fells Point in 1985 for $12,000 and borrowed $40,000 to restore it. I am a union bricklayer, so I also contributed hundreds of hours of uncompensated labor toward the restoration of my home.

  • Maryland's Homestead Property Tax Credit needs revision

    Your article "Distorted discount" (Dec. 18) made a good case for a full legislative review and revision of the Maryland Homestead Property Tax Credit. It would be hard to imagine a more Byzantine, distorted, unfair and unenforceable system of taxation.

  • Homestead tax credit does its job

    I must congratulate your reporters for their investigative report on property taxes that recently appeared in The Sun ("Distorted discount," Dec. 18).

  • Don't chase away Baltimore's rich, too

    Jamie Smith Hopkins and Scott Calvert wrote an excellent in-depth article about Baltimore City property taxes ("Distorted discount," Dec. 18). However, I am perplexed that they seem to think that Baltimore's wealthy are getting a "break" because of the Homestead tax credit.

  • City property tax burden overstated

    The Sun investigation into the Homestead tax credit and its impact on the city ("Distorted discount," Dec. 18) perpetuates the fiction that the Baltimore property tax rate (2.268 percent) is "at least double that of any other jurisdiction in Maryland."

  • Replace the Homestead Property Tax Credit with a state-wide flat tax

    Your article "Distorted discount" (Dec. 18) suggests getting rid of the homestead property tax credit. Eliminating the property tax credit could reduce Baltimore City's property tax rate by 13 percent and provide the uniform taxation of all property owners required by the state constitution. But...

  • Homestead property tax credit is unfair

    Kudos to Jamie Smith Hopkins and Scott Calvert for their excellent investigative report on Homestead Property Tax Credit ("Distorted discount," Dec. 18). I always thought I was paying much more taxes than my neighbors. I went online, and saw for myself. Some of my neighbors are getting a whopping...