Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion Editorial

Congress creates a transportation time bomb

Tick, tick, tick.

The big political news of last week, the brief skirmish between House Speaker John A. Boehner and President Barack Obama over whether the president would address Congress on Wednesday or Thursday, was the classic sort of playground standoff that just annoys the heck out of most Americans. How perfect that a speech on job creation (something that should matter to all involved) gets shelved so that it won't interfere with a Republican presidential candidates' debate or housekeeping votes on the House floor. That's Washington in all its inaction.

Overshadowed in this brouhaha is something everyone involved really ought to be talking about: Washington's failure to approve a transportation spending plan. On the same day that insiders were focused on Mr. Boehner's refusal, President Obama was calling attention to the fact that the current transportation bill is set to expire Sept. 30.

That's a far more meaningful deadline than any one-day delay in rolling out the jobs proposal — particularly given the likelihood that House Republicans will nix whatever Mr. Obama wants to do to improve the economy anyway. Unless Congress extends legislation to fund highways, transit and air travel, the economy could lose 1 million more jobs.

Tick, tick, tick.

Americans may recall that the Federal Aviation Administration was partially shut down for two weeks this summer, and ongoing construction projects were halted, because an extension of that agency's funding couldn't be reached. And that inaction cost the U.S. a mere $30 million a day.

This time, the stakes are much higher, as the federal government spends $42 billion annually on transportation projects. Never mind the thousands of government workers who will lose their jobs without pay; the real impact will be on the contractors and suppliers across the country who build and maintain the nation's transportation infrastructure. That's the kind of anti-stimulus that could ensure a double-dip recession.

No wonder Mr. Obama's call was echoed by top officials from both the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO, two sides seldom in agreement. Without an extension of the 18.4-cent-per-gallon federal tax on gasoline (as well as fees charged for heavy vehicles and truck tires), the trust fund that finances highway and transit projects will simply run out of money.

Republican leaders may minimize the risk of a shutdown, but their track record on deadline decision-making is not so great. The last time the GOP went to the mattresses over long-term spending, a major bond rating agency stripped away the nation's triple-A rating.

Meanwhile, renewing the gas tax may be seen by tea party loyalists as an example of raising taxes. Some may expect offsets in domestic spending (never mind that transportation spending has been historically financed separately). Others may use the legislation as a platform to kill Amtrak or the Obama high-speed rail initiative.

If Washington had its act together, Congress would pass not some one- or two-year extension but a six-year spending plan with vision, one that overhauled both the way this country finances transportation and the projects it pursues. As cars become increasingly fuel efficient, the U.S. can't continue to pay for improvements primarily through the gas tax. And we can't afford to continue to build roads and not invest in more energy-efficient public transit alternatives.

Admittedly, that would seem unlikely in a Congress that can't even agree to raise the debt ceiling until the 11th hour. Nor is it a good sign that House Republicans have been pushing for an overall reduction in federal transportation spending — as if the U.S. Highway Trust Fund were the cause of the country's debt problems instead of the partial cure, given that improved transportation systems inevitably foster new jobs and growth.

The bottom line is that everyone, from management to labor to the White House and the House Republican Caucus, wants a transportation bill, and failing to pass one could be nothing short of catastrophic for the economy. So naturally, Congress dithers and the deadline looms.

Tick, tick, tick.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Rural counties need a transportation lockbox [Letter]

    Rural counties need a transportation lockbox [Letter]

    This fall, Maryland voters will have a constitutional amendment on the ballot of interest to all state residents, taxpayers and drivers: Question 1, which will create a "lockbox" for state transportation funds.

  • Stop the stopgap thinking on transportation funding

    Stop the stopgap thinking on transportation funding

    As of late last week, the average price of a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline in the Baltimore area hovered around $2.71, about six cents below the national average and a few pennies less than a week ago. One year ago, the average was $3.52. And where are gasoline prices headed in September?...

  • How to fix Md.'s aging infrastructure

    How to fix Md.'s aging infrastructure

    Recent Sun articles and editorials have pointed the way forward for Maryland's aging infrastructure ("States scramble as federal highway funding erodes," Feb. 21).

  • Shouldn't Md. already have been inspecting aging bridges?

    Shouldn't Md. already have been inspecting aging bridges?

    The top transportation official in the state has ordered an immediate inspection of 27 aging bridges. This announcement comes after a slab of concrete from an I-495 overpass struck a car in Prince George's County ("Md. to inspect aging bridges," Feb. 13).

  • A pothole jars home the true cost of tax cuts

    A pothole jars home the true cost of tax cuts

    I just spent $650 for new wheel and a new tire because of damage from a pothole on an urban street. I was not speeding. I needed AAA service at 10 o'clock at night. And it could have been worse.

  • Tell Congress to fix our crumbling transportation infrastructure

    Tell Congress to fix our crumbling transportation infrastructure

    For nearly six years America has not had a long-term transportation bill. While Congress has bickered and passed short-term patchwork bills, our nation's roads, bridges and public transit systems have deteriorated. Moreover, projects to modernize and expand our transportation infrastructure have...

  • Gas tax is wasted

    Gas tax is wasted

    In your editorial, "Congress on the clock" (April 13), you talk about the federal Highway Trust Fund going bankrupt unless Congress acts to raise taxes. Motorists deserve better highways and bridge repair, but the truth is not all of the tax money motorists pay goes to build or repair roads or...

  • What's the cost of lower tolls?

    What's the cost of lower tolls?

    It is my understanding that Maryland's transportation infrastructure is in serious need of maintenance. If that is the case, what could possibly be the point of reducing the tolls on our highways, other than to make political capital ("Panel expected to OK toll reductions," May 7)?