Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Editorial

Maryland's Obamacare gamble pays off

The outcome of last week's presidential election has vindicated the wisdom of Maryland's early decision to begin setting up a state health exchange where consumers can shop for affordable health insurance coverage. President Barack Obama's victory virtually assures that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act he signed in 2010 will go into effect as planned in 2014. Having survived constitutional challenges in the Supreme Court earlier this year and an election-year campaign pledge by GOP challenger Mitt Romney to dismantle the law if elected, states across the country must now start setting up similar exchanges or face having the federal government do it for them.

Only Maryland and a 14 other states plus the District of Columbia have taken concrete steps toward establishing the kind of state insurance exchanges mandated by the health reform law, and among them, Maryland is generally considered to be among the farthest along in its efforts. Until now, many of the remaining states delayed getting started because Republican officials there hoped the courts would throw out the law or that Mr. Romney would be elected and fulfill his promise to scrap it. Now the states have until Friday to say whether they plan to set up their own exchanges or have the federal government do it for them.

The Department of Health and Human Services on Friday extended the deadline for states to send in their blueprints for exchanges, but 11 states have already decided not to participate. In other states, governors said they would wait until after the election to decide how to proceed, but realistically, it's too late to start from scratch, even with the extended deadline.

As envisioned by the law, the state exchanges are to function as insurance clearinghouses where consumers could shop for the best values in coverage and rates. By opting from the start to work on setting up an exchange, Maryland officials guaranteed that they, and not the federal government, would get to make key decisions about how the new marketplace will fit in with the state's current system of regulating insurance and delivering care.

There is some irony here. Maryland, a state dominated by Democrats who generally favor a more expansive role for the federal government, insisted on and will get authority to run their own exchange. But in Republican-dominated dominated states like Texas and Kansas, for example, the decision not to set up an exchange hands over significant power to federal bureaucrats.

The exchanges won't themselves have the power to directly set insurance rates — those will be determined by the private companies that sell coverage — but they will establish minimum benefit levels and set the parameters for other aspects of the plans they endorse, which should help assure consumers that they're getting the best value for their money. Individuals and companies can still buy insurance plans that aren't listed on the exchanges but they will likely have to pay more for them for the same levels of coverage. Many of those who buy insurance through the exchanges will be eligible for federal subsidies.

Gov. Martin O'Malley and state lawmakers embraced the health exchange concept early, and as a result Maryland has already made substantial progress toward getting its exchange, called the Maryland Health Connection, up and running. The state created an independent government agency to set overall policy and make any changes needed to bring the state's current health care system into compliance with the federal health reform law. Its nine-member board of directors includes six members appointed by the governor with the remaining seats filled by the state health secretary, the state insurance commissioner and the executive director of the Maryland Health Care Commission.

In addition, Maryland recently received a $123 million federal grant to fund the establishment of its exchange. Coupled with earlier federal start-up and early innovator awards the state has received a total of about $157 million in federal grants for its exchange, which has been put into place virtually without the use of state funds. Moreover, Maryland may still be eligible for several million dollars more in federal grants available to states whose models can be replicated elsewhere.

Maryland's plan potentially could extend affordable health insurance coverage to as many as half of the 720,000 state residents who currently lack it. That alone would save the state some $850 million over the coming decade in lower Medicaid and uncompensated hospital emergency room care costs.

Massachusetts' health care reform law, which also included the establishment of an insurance exchange and was signed by then-Governor Romney in 2006, helped tamp down the escalation of health care costs there by extending affordable coverage to nearly everyone in the state. There is every reason to think Maryland can duplicate that success.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Health exchange still a hassle
    Health exchange still a hassle

    I found The Sun's editorial, "Beyond the website" (Nov. 23), about how well the new-and-improved Maryland Health Connection had launched to be ironic and not in a good way. Perhaps you should have looked beyond the health insurance website itself to see if the system really had been improved...

  • Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?
    Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?

    Who are Gov. Martin O'Malley and Attorney General Doug Gansler trying to kid? The reason potential litigation over the flawed rollout of Maryland's health exchange is being postponed is the upcoming election. They are deeply afraid of what Noridian is going to claim about Lt. Gov. Anthony...

  • Why is The Sun ignoring Gruber?
    Why is The Sun ignoring Gruber?

    This past week several videos have surfaced showing one of the architects of Obamacare saying it only passed because the American people are stupid and were lied to ("Who are you calling stupid?" Nov. 14). According to Jonathan Gruber, our elected officials lied to us about keeping our...

  • Health exchange officials must work to improve the quality of care
    Health exchange officials must work to improve the quality of care

    The National Alliance on Mental Illness applauds the Easter Seals' recent article encouraging lawmakers to improve health insurance plan benefits for millions of Americans ("Getting what you pay for in the ACA," Nov. 15).

  • Obamacare has raised costs
    Obamacare has raised costs

    I read with interest the news regarding the increased cost of drugs for those who have signed on with the Affordable Care Act. I am one of those who went from a co-pay of zero to a monthly cost of $299.62 for medication to control a chronic illness, ulcerative colitis. There is no cure and...

  • Psychiatrists aren't the only ones who provide mental health services
    Psychiatrists aren't the only ones who provide mental health services

    In response to your article concerning the dearth of psychiatrists in the area ("Health reform spotlights shortage in Md. of psychiatrists," Jan. 27), this is true, but you forgot to mention that there are other providers who treat mental health issues. For example, psychologists and social...