Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Editorial

Baltimore's moment of silence [Editorial]

This week, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon ordered state troopers to take over responsibility for maintaining order in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, following several days of unrest sparked by the killing of an unarmed black teenager by a local police officer. Mr. Nixon waited far too long to bring in the state Highway Patrol to calm the situation, but he was absolutely correct in his judgment that local authorities weren't up to the job and were actually making matters worse. Had police there exhibited the restraint shown by Baltimore officers on Thursday, when a peaceful crowd rallied near City Hall to support Ferguson's residents with a moment of silence, it's likely things never would have got to a point where the governor had to intervene.

The Aug. 9 shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown under circumstances that remain unclear prompted hundreds of Ferguson residents to take to the streets in protests that drew international attention. There they were met by a massive local police presence whose heavy-handed tactics only seemed to inflame the situation. Despite some reports of looting by demonstrators, the protests remained mostly peaceful, yet the aggressive behavior of the police seemed almost intended to stir up the crisis atmosphere and provoke violence.

By contrast, Baltimore's demonstrations were a model of peaceful protest. Instead of appearing in riot gear and armored vehicles, city officers made no attempt to disperse the crowd and limited themselves to directing traffic and clearing a path for demonstrators through the heavily traveled downtown. They didn't point assault rifles at participants or fire tear canisters and rubber bullets. Most importantly they didn't do anything to deter anyone from exercising their right to peaceful assembly for the purpose of seeking a redress for grievances. They were clearly there to protect the demonstrators, not to suppress them.

Thursday's protest probably couldn't have happened the way they did in the era before social media. What began as a small march by a few dozen demonstrators grew to a crowd of several hundred as news of the gathering flashed on Twitter and Facebook. Nor was the event confined to just Baltimore. Nearly 100 cities across the country witnessed demonstrations of solidarity with the Ferguson protests, with virtually no serious violence reported. Social media were the organizing force that allowed thousands of people nationwide to express their outrage over the excessive use of force by police in Ferguson.

The events there have sparked a passionate discussion over the militarization of American police departments, which have received billions of dollars worth of surplus vehicles, weapons and other equipment from the Defense Department and the Department of Homeland Security since the late 1990s. It's becoming apparent that we're paying a price for that policy. What started out as an effort to equip police with materiel they might need to protect citizens from a terrorist attack has turned them into an occupying force in the communities they serve. Paradoxically, police forces have begun to behave more like military organizations at the same time our armed forces abroad increasingly are being called on to function as police.

But if people see themselves as victims of a hostile military presence, rather than as citizens who enjoy the police's protection, they will soon cease to trust or respect the police. That is what happened in Ferguson, and it's a problem shared by too many other communities of color across the country. We need to get back to the idea of community policing, in which police departments work with the communities they serve to solve crimes and where residents trust officers enough to cooperate in investigations. In places like Ferguson, where there is a radical mismatch between the demographics of the population and the police, that challenge is all the greater.

The vast majority of police work never involves the need for armored vehicles, SWAT teams, rubber bullets or tear gas. Yet too often, as in Ferguson, that has become the first response of police to any disturbance or volatile situation. Officers think they need to dominate rather than simply maintain order. The police in Ferguson apparently thought their job was to control every aspect of the demonstrations there by bullying and intimidating residents. But in acting on that belief they only showed how out of control they themselves were. Fortunately, police in Baltimore and elsewhere were wise enough not to make the same mistake.

To respond to this editorial, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Most police officers serve honorably
    Most police officers serve honorably

    Several decades ago, Baltimore City Police went on strike as a last resort over a contract dispute. Immediately, hoodlums swung into action looting businesses and terrorizing citizens living in the inner city. I personally witnessed the criminal activities as I covered the streets in my role as...

  • Lessons from a concert interrupted
    Lessons from a concert interrupted

    The Annual Lighting of Baltimore's Washington Monument at Mount Vernon Place was interrupted last week as more than 100 protesters marched from the Inner Harbor in a peaceful, but noisy, demonstration ("Demonstrators interrupt Baltimore monument lighting event," Dec. 5). The protest,...

  • Does Obama not care about black-on-black crime?
    Does Obama not care about black-on-black crime?

    In response to your article Dec. 2 article, "Obama calls for $263M police plan," why hasn't President Barack Obama ever had a White House conference to discuss the thousands of murders committed by African Americans against other African Americans since he has been president?

  • We 'can't breathe' either
    We 'can't breathe' either

    As many times as it has been shown on television and observed online, the shaky cellphone video of police officer Daniel Pantaleo taking down 43-year-old Eric Garner in a chokehold — with the large man who was asthmatic pleading, "I can't breathe" — remains painful to watch. Given...

  • Time to remove bad cops
    Time to remove bad cops

    Eric Garner died because he was obese. That was the inference of the New York police officers who dropped him to the ground and snuffed out his life. Mr. Garner tried in vain to tell the cops, "I can't breathe." They did not pay heed to his dying words.

  • Time to move on from Ferguson
    Time to move on from Ferguson

    Maybe it's time the media stopped writing articles and airing stories about the protesters in Ferguson, Mo., and elsewhere ("Morgan State students again protest in solidarity with Ferguson, Mo.," Dec. 1).

  • Garner case shows video is not enough
    Garner case shows video is not enough

    Once again, the criminal justice system has failed this country ("N.Y. officer not indicted in death," Dec. 4). And again, the criminal justice system owes us an explanation. Today, another police officer remained un-indicted for the killing of a civilian.

  • Ferguson's grievance
    Ferguson's grievance

    The rioting and violence that erupted in Ferguson, Mo., after the news Monday night that a white police officer would not be indicted in the shooting death of an unarmed black teen were inexcusable. The cause of racial justice will not be advanced by protesters wreaking wanton destruction on...

Comments
Loading