Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Editorial

Blue outlook for blue crabs

By most accounts, this has been a good year for eating Maryland blue crabs — just not by human beings. The Chesapeake Bay crab harvest is down, in part because of predators and cannibalism, but that's not the whole story.

In 2011, Maryland officials reported a record year for blue crab reproduction. It was such a successful spawn that most people in the seafood industry were licking their lips with anticipation. Surely, harvests would rise as those baby crabs matured into adulthood in late 2012 and the first half of 2013. That didn't happen.

Last year's crab harvest was mediocre at best (about 56 million pounds bay-wide) and down significantly from the previous year's catch. This year's will surely be worse. So what happened to all those baby crabs?

Scientists speculate that many of them were eaten long before they could grow big enough — five inches wide — to be legally caught by a Maryland or Virginia waterman and end up at a local restaurant or backyard crab feast. The suspects? Striped bass and red drum, which love to eat immature crabs. As it happens, both fish species had unusually good spawns themselves in recent years, and those youngsters showed up in the bay hungry.

But it's also likely that the young crabs started eating each other, too. That kind of cannibalism is not unusual among crabs, particularly when so many are bunched together in the same year class — it's a matter of survival of the fittest.

There are other factors, too. The amount of submerged aquatic vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay is down, so young crabs had fewer places to hide when they shed their shells and were more vulnerable to predation. Warm weather may have encouraged more predator fish to enter the bay as well. Even climate change may have been a factor as red drum, for instance, were rarely found north of New Jersey but have more recently been caught off Cape Cod.

All of which is not merely some interesting biology lesson but a sign that Maryland and Virginia need to take a second look at their approach to managing the blue crab population. While the two states have gotten more conservative over the last half-decade — relying on scientific models that consider the total crab population and particularly the number of female crabs before setting harvest limits — that approach may not be enough.

The fluctuations in the blue crab population are a little scary — like extreme stock market volatility before a crash. The Maryland Department of Natural Resources now estimates that there are about 300 million blue crab in the bay. Last year, the estimate was 764 million, more than twice as many.

As we've often noted before, a pollution-stressed Chesapeake probably can't produce the seafood bonanza it once did. Crabs are a hardy species, but even they have their limits. Weather plays a huge factor in crab reproduction — specifically, the wind and currents at the mouth of the Chesapeake in September and October decide whether the tiny larvae will end up in the bay or be swept out to the Atlantic Ocean.

The one thing that human beings can control is fishing pressure. Ensuring that there are enough crabs so that the species can reproduce in sufficient numbers has to be a top priority.

The DNR has already tightened rules to protect female crabs and reduce fishing pressure. But it may be time to look at quotas, too. If watermen were regulated by seasonal quota instead of daily harvest restrictions on where, when and how many crabs can be caught, they'd be more inclined to catch crabs when the prices are high and leave them alone when prices are down. That would likely reduce fishing pressure in the fall, allowing more mature crabs to survive into the following year, particularly migrating females.

This much is clear. Crabs are scarce this year and in danger of becoming scarcer, and their numbers might not rebound quite so quickly as they have in the past. Maryland won't see a harvest of any kind unless the species is protected — not just from pollution, loss of underwater plants, global warming, hungry red drum and their own cannibalistic instincts but from the threat of overfishing by commercial and recreational fisherman alike.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • What about Pa. manure?
    What about Pa. manure?

    On an almost recurring basis lately, The Sun has devoted itself to bringing to everyone's attention the Eastern Shore poultry industry's polluted runoff flowing into the Chesapeake Bay ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13). Attention should be directed to the Amish...

  • Hogan can protect farms and open space
    Hogan can protect farms and open space

    Congratulations to Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan on his inauguration. Mr. Hogan ran a terrific campaign, and we all look forward to his leadership on one of the most important roles, safeguarding the lands and waters of this beautiful state.

  • New rules needed to protect Eastern Shore waterways
    New rules needed to protect Eastern Shore waterways

    After talking about it for years, Maryland finally has proposed long-overdue regulations on phosphorous pollution from animal manure in the Chesapeake Bay ("Hogan vows to fight farm pollution rules," Dec. 8).

  • Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution
    Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution

    Dan Rodricks' arguments for protecting the Chesapeake Bay from pollution from chicken farms could have been even stronger ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13).

  • Kamenetz is pandering on stormwater fees
    Kamenetz is pandering on stormwater fees

    Thank your for your recent article, "Reduced stormwater fees sought," (Jan. 17) and the editorial covering the same topics ("Backtracking on the bay," Jan. 22). Baltimore County Executive Kevin Kamenetz seems to be pandering to special interests and positioning himself for higher office. His...

  • Md. leaders protect funds for bay cleanup
    Md. leaders protect funds for bay cleanup

    Senators Barbara Mikulski and Ben Cardin, along with Rep. Steny Hoyer, deserve our thanks for securing funding in the recent omnibus appropriations bill to keep Maryland on track to cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay and its rivers and streams ("For better or worse, spending bill passes," Dec. 15).

  • Excess phosphorous is killing the bay
    Excess phosphorous is killing the bay

    In the days following Dan Rodricks' column "Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor" (Dec. 13), your paper has been flooded with letters opposing the phosphorus management tool (PMT) regulations and opposing Mr. Rodricks position. On the surface it would seem that both letters in...

  • Rodricks wrong on bay pollution
    Rodricks wrong on bay pollution

    It is time for those writing for The Sun's editorial pages to check their facts. Columnist Dan Rodricks writes that poultry farmers are allowing their chicken manure to run into the Chesapeake Bay ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13.