Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Editorial

News Opinion Editorial

Ceasefire Baltimore [Editorial]

Of the ideas for reducing violence in Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's State of the City address, the one with the greatest potential for immediate impact on Baltimore's skyrocketing homicide rate is her commitment to fully pursuing a set of crime fighting strategies known as Operation Ceasefire. Developed in Boston in the 1990s, Ceasefire is based on what is by now a familiar premise in Baltimore, that a disproportionate amount of violence is committed by a small and inter-related set of people. It targets them with interventions designed both to assist them in leaving violence behind and to offer swift and sure consequences if they don't. It worked in Boston, it has worked in other cities that have tried it, and it can work here.

The program goes like this: Officials hold what is known as a "call in" or a forum for gang members. There, street-wise outreach workers, respected community members like ministers, victims of crime, reformed felons, social workers and others make the consequences of violence on the community clear while offering support for those who want to leave the gang life behind. They may offer job training assistance, GED classes and other services. Then the police come in and explain what the consequences will be if the violence continues.

The police don't offer a free pass for non-violent offenses, but they do make clear that all members of a gang will be held accountable for the violence committed by one. They promise to "pull all the levers," in Ceasefire parlance, to go after those associated with violence for every offense possible, from drug dealing to public drunkenness. There, it differs from the indiscriminate mass arrest policies that Baltimore and other cities have employed. By using sophisticated tools to analyze the social networks of gang members, the enforcement activity can be targeted just at those who commit violence and their close associates. Essentially, it relies on existing networks and street codes as self-enforcement mechanisms to reduce violence.

If all that sounds somewhat familiar, it's because Baltimore has employed most of those tactics to one degree or another. The city conducted some call-ins and was able to track the response from those who wanted out of the gang life. Former police Commissioner Frederick H. Bealefeld III's "bad guys with guns" strategy was similar in many respects to the targeted enforcement used in Ceasefire. Under Gov. Martin O'Malley, the state's parole and probation office began working much more closely with city police to help in that effort. And the Exile program in the Baltimore U.S. attorney's office has brought the enhanced resources necessary to provide the sure, swift and severe punishment that goes along with a Ceasefire-like strategy.

In Boston, the results from Ceasefire were immediate and profound. It was implemented there in response to a rise in youth homicides in the mid-1990s, and it was associated with a 63 percent drop in such killings. Ceasefire was discontinued for a time in Boston, and killings started to rise again. Then it was reinstated in 2007, and violence receded. Total gang-related shootings dropped by 30 percent between 2006 and 2010, but according to a 2013 research paper published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, shootings involving the gangs specifically targeted by Ceasefire dropped by 57 percent on average.

Results in other cities have been just as impressive; Cincinnati adopted Ceasefire under the tutelage of its prime architect, criminologist David M. Kennedy, and gang-related homicides there dropped by half within the first two years of its implementation. For that matter, Baltimore experienced its lowest homicide totals in decades during the years when it was most actively engaged in Ceasefire-like activities.

It has also become clear through the experience of other cities that Ceasefire is resource-intensive and requires real commitment from law enforcement officials, political leaders, community groups and others. It's not something that can be done half-way. That's why it was heartening to see Mayor Rawlings-Blake make it the first program idea she discussed in her State of the City address. Part of what makes Ceasefire work is that it represents a concerted statement that violence is not acceptable in any form, even when it is a matter of one gang member attacking another. Her administration has at times failed in communicating that sentiment in its attempts to highlight declines in other types of crime, most explicitly in Police Commissioner Anthony Batts' recent assertion that the city's high homicide rate is not something that affects "everyday citizens."

In contrast, the mayor got it right when she noted her own family's terrible experiences with Baltimore's violence, saying, "Each life that is lost represents a future tragically cut short, a community that is shaken, and a family that is shattered by their loss." Ceasefire has the potential to change the culture of violence here, but only if that message goes from the mayor, to the police, to the communities, to the gang members on the streets.

To respond to this editorial, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Metrics of Baltimore's distress

    Metrics of Baltimore's distress

    Reading your paper lately has become quite depressing. Perhaps you could start publishing a front-page table showing the number of people shot to death each day, plus the number of heroin overdose deaths and the number of infants delivered in the city's hospitals.

  • Mayor has emboldened criminals

    Mayor has emboldened criminals

    Everyone is wondering why the increase in crime in Charm City since the riots ("Monday shooting victim is Baltimore's 36th May homicide," May 27). The reason for the violence is quite simple. It can be directly attributed to the Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's indecision in a time of crisis. It...

  • Baltimore police have been handcuffed

    Baltimore police have been handcuffed

    The astronomical increase in shootings and homicides in Baltimore is easy to explain. The criminal element is now in charge — no more police to hassle them and take their guns. They feel protected by the powers that be, and they are. They are shooting and killing each other because they are angry?...

  • Why aren't black leaders talking about personal responsibility?

    Why aren't black leaders talking about personal responsibility?

    Nothing will change until that happens.

  • Do black lives matter in Baltimore?

    Do black lives matter in Baltimore?

    "Black lives matter!" was the chant heard at recent demonstrations in cities and towns from Ferguson, Mo., to Baltimore. Yes, they do matter, but apparently not so much to some other blacks. Only when a white police officer shoots or engages in other behavior that results in the death of a black...

  • Baltimore is reeling

    Baltimore is reeling

    Baltimore is on its knees. It is probably the only major American city where the prisoners ran the detention facility with the full cooperation of jail employees.

  • Decriminalize drugs and crime will drop

    Decriminalize drugs and crime will drop

    Officers deployed in a futile effort to clear corners of drug traffickers, officers tied up in court, court dockets bloated, jails overcrowded, discouraging recidivism — here we go again ("Baltimore prosecutor asked police to target area where Freddie Gray was arrested," June 9).

  • How to reduce gun violence

    How to reduce gun violence

    At a time when Baltimore could desperately use some good news when it comes to the prospects of reducing violence, research from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health suggests we may already have taken a key step toward preventing gun homicides — it just may take a few years for us...

Comments
Loading

82°