Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Editorial

News Opinion Editorial

A budget breakthrough, but at what cost?

This week, the focus in Annapolis will be on the state's 2013 budget and the compromise struck by the Senate's Budget and Taxation Committee over education spending. Teachers, school boards, county executives and other local government leaders would be wise to rally behind the plan that takes many of the sharp edges off what Gov.Martin O'Malley had initially proposed.

But here's the rub: Much of the compromise is made possible because senators were willing to raise Maryland's income tax rates much more broadly than the governor sought and to use that money to cushion the blow of deficit-reduction on local school systems. While Mr. O'Malley wanted to lower income tax exemptions in a manner that would raise taxes for only the top 20 percent of earners, the Senate would reach into more pockets in order to raise more revenue — in the neighborhood of $300 million annually.

Might the General Assembly be able to close a $1 billion deficit, shift a portion of the cost of teacher pensions to local government, fully fund public education and hold Baltimore and the 23 county's fully responsible for school spending in the future without so broad an increase in state income tax rates? That remains to be seen.

Certainly, there is much to like in the Senate's approach. After years of debate, local governments would finally finance a share of teacher pensions, but the burden would be phased in over four years (at one-quarter of the cost added each year) and only cover the so-called "normal cost" of retirement — that is, the actuarial cost of a current employee for that year's service. That's a bit less than either Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller had wanted or Governor O'Malley had proposed. The state would remain responsible for fully-funding accrued liabilities — a much larger cost but one that should gradually diminish over the next several decades.

Yet Baltimore and the counties are net beneficiaries, too, at least for the first several years. The budget would raise local aid sufficiently to cover the pension cost. That "found" money should do wonders for jurisdictions anticipating a struggle to balance their next year's budgets.

It would also strengthen the state's "maintenance of effort" law to ensure that local governments fully fund K-12 schools in future years. Those jurisdictions that fail to do so could have a portion of their income tax revenue diverted to their school system by the state. That's not likely to please local leaders, but the Senate plan would offer them more opportunities to have that requirement temporarily waived if circumstances warranted it.

A strengthened maintenance of effort law was a high priority for school advocates, and local governments were vociferously opposed to the pension shift because of their own budget shortfalls. The Senate proposal elegantly offers both sides victory and extracts concessions. The only question is, are taxpayers treated as respectfully?

The pension shift saves the state hundreds of millions of dollars in the long run. And the alternative of forcing pension costs on local governments without new revenue directed their way might have translated into local property tax increases — a less progressive form of taxation — or cuts to vital services including classroom spending.

The Senate tax plan also deserves credit for asking more from higher earners. Marylanders earning $200,000 and filing jointly would pay no more than 5 percent (not counting the local piggyback) while those earning more than $500,000 would pay as much as 5.75 percent. The proposal also offers a slight increase in the earned income tax credit for low-wage workers.

Nor does the plan depend solely on spending cuts and income taxes to balance the budget. It also raises an assortment of taxes and fees from some appropriate sources — increasing the cost of cigars and other tobacco products, applying the sales tax to certain Internet sellers, and closing a loophole in the mortgage recordation tax, to name a few.

Senator Miller is unlikely to find a lot of tax-averse Republican votes for this budget plan, but those senators who want Maryland schools to remain among the best in the nation should find much to like. Even teachers opposed to the pension shift will have to acknowledge its merits as the proposal protects their future benefits without taking more money out of their pockets.

The only fly in the ointment is whether all this might be accomplished with less sacrifice from taxpayers, and that's no trivial matter. We cannot escape the fear that senators are seeking to raise more money than is truly necessary to make their plan work. We look forward to a robust debate on that point on the Senate floor this week and again when the measure lands in the House of Delegates.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland's unfriendly business climate kills another 1,000 jobs

    Maryland's unfriendly business climate kills another 1,000 jobs

    Maryland is incredibly unfriendly to business with its heavy burden of regulations, high taxes and an out-of-control minority business enterprise extortion process that enriches a few African-Americans without hiring the inner city minorities it is designed to assist ("The Bechtel blame game,"...

  • Senator displays his own arrogance

    Senator displays his own arrogance

    State Sen. Paul Pinsky writes an appropriately-named commentary condemning corporate lobbyists and maintaining that he and his fellow Democrats will fight against this "corporate victory" in the past election ("Post-election arrogance?" Nov. 14). That's funny. I was under the apparently mistaken...

  • Hogan's fiscal realities

    Hogan's fiscal realities

    When Republican Larry Hogan was elected governor this month, his platform was narrow and clear: Roll back as many of the tax increases of the last eight years as possible. When he made that promise, he knew he faced a $405 million shortfall in this year's budget and next year's as soon as he walked...

  • Congress must create a level playing field for bricks-and-mortar businesses and online vendors

    Congress must create a level playing field for bricks-and-mortar businesses and online vendors

    During the next few weeks Congress will have the opportunity to pass e-fairness legislation, which will update our sales tax system and restore fairness to small businesses in our community.

  • A bad investment

    A bad investment

    Maryland's film industry employs a lot of good people, mostly highly skilled laborers. Because the state has been home to a string of television series over the years, of which "Veep" and "House of Cards" are only the latest, many of them have set down roots here and have contributed to the community...

  • No major tax rollbacks?

    No major tax rollbacks?

    Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller told some reporters this week what most State House observers have long suspected — we should not expect some sweeping reduction in taxes during the upcoming legislative session. He also produced a spirited defense of the tax increases approved during Gov....

  • Can Hogan get state spending under control?

    Can Hogan get state spending under control?

    A recent report failed to recognize that the major contributors to Maryland's and every other state's fiscal problems are their government employee pension plans ("Business groups look to reduce tax burden for some," Dec. 5).

  • Hogan's fiscal rhetoric meets reality

    Hogan's fiscal rhetoric meets reality

    When Gov.-elect Larry Hogan proclaimed the need for "strong medicine" to cure Maryland's fiscal state, he drew some jeers from the Democrats in Annapolis. The O'Malley administration bristled at the notion that he was bad-mouthing the incumbent governor's fiscal management. Sen. Richard Madaleno...

Comments
Loading

54°