Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Editorial

News Opinion Editorial

Ministering to nonbelievers

Army officials at Fort Meade are resisting calls from service members who describe themselves as atheists to officially recognize lay leaders to represent their beliefs and help military chaplains minister to the needs of nonbelievers. The Army recognizes lay leaders among Christians, Jews and Muslims, but says it can't do the same for 10,000 or so active-duty service members who are atheists because they belong to no organized religion.

It's debatable whether the set of beliefs to which many atheists subscribe — among them a conviction that humans cannot look to God to solve their problems, and that people must seek within themselves and each other to find meaning and fulfillment in life — constitutes a "religion" in the conventional sense. Many atheists do consider themselves part of a larger spiritual and ethical community of faith, albeit one that does not require belief in a higher power.

It's also a difficult question whether atheists would be able to effectively serve the function of a chaplain. Because of the nature of the military, there is a strong possibility that a soldier in crisis will find himself or herself seeking counsel from a chaplain of a different religion or denomination. A Catholic soldier may wind up talking to a Jewish chaplain, or vice-versa. Atheist chaplains would need to be able to meet the spiritual needs of not just other atheists but also those for whom a belief in God is central.

What's certain, however, is that the military needs to be accepting of those who do not believe, and that apparently hasn't always been the case at Fort Meade and other military bases. Chaplains and religious lay leaders have been accused of treating atheists either as moral pariahs unfit to wear the uniform or trying to convert them to their personal religious beliefs regarding God and salvation. Service members who describe themselves as atheists have complained of religious bias against nonbelievers and a lack of sensitivity to their needs for affirmation and a sense of connectedness to a community of like-minded individuals.

That's no more acceptable for a chaplain or lay religious leader than refusing to respect the beliefs of the service's other recognized religions or denominations. Commanders must demand that those entrusted with caring for the spiritual needs of troops refrain from proselytizing their personal religious convictions.

That will require strong leadership of the kind that Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz recently demonstrated when he issued a strong memo admonishing officers of their duty to balance the Constitution's protection of religious freedom with the prohibition against a governmental establishment of religion, and warned them against "appearing to officially endorse religion generally or any particular religion."

Military chaplains and lay religious leaders will also need better training in counseling and support for all service members who seek their help, including nonbelievers. The hoary aphorism that "there are no atheists in foxholes" is contradicted by, among others, the examples of Baseball Hall of Famer and combat pilot Ted Williams and former NFL player and soldier Pat Tillman, neither of whom considered himself religious.

If today's chaplains and lay religious leaders can't bring themselves to respect the beliefs of such men, both of whom performed courageously in battle, the fault lies not in their faith, whatever it may be, but in the narrow, intolerant way they — and the armed forces — have chosen to interpret it.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Schmoke's vindication
    Schmoke's vindication

    When Gov. Larry Hogan's task force on heroin overdose deaths met at the University of Baltimore last week, the panel was greeted by the school's newly installed president, Kurt Schmoke, a former Baltimore mayor with plenty of experience coping with the city's heroin epidemic. More than 20 years...

  • Big pharma should support the NIH
    Big pharma should support the NIH

    Recently at a reception, one of my faculty colleagues at Johns Hopkins expressed concern about her academic future. The pay line for National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants in her field was 7 percent; that means that she has to spend two or three weeks writing a proposal that has only a 7 percent...

  • What Hillary Clinton needs to do to win
    What Hillary Clinton needs to do to win

    In finally declaring her 2016 presidential candidacy, Hillary Clinton put a reverse twist on the old break-up line, "It's not you. It's me." Her pitch, she said, is all about you -- the voters and what you need -- not about me and my ambition to follow my husband into the Oval Office.

  • Michael Phelps [Poll]
    Michael Phelps [Poll]
  • Restoring people's faith in government
    Restoring people's faith in government

    In Maryland and across the country, Americans are growing deeply cynical about Washington. And for good reason. They perceive that policymaking is increasingly an insider's game, with little role for the public itself. They feel that their voices go unheard in Congress. And they see, time and time...

  • Is there value to the n-word?
    Is there value to the n-word?

    The "n-word" — what a complicated topic to discuss in 2015. You're either for its free expression or against its very existence.

Comments
Loading

63°