Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Editorial
News Opinion Editorial

Kermit Gosnell and the 'liberal media'

The murder trial of Kermit Gosnell, a Philadelphia abortion provider, entered its fifth week today riding a peculiar media firestorm. The focus of much attention in recent days was not on Dr. Gosnell, who is charged in the death of seven babies and an adult patient who died of an overdose, but on a claim that the trial is getting modest coverage in the national media — allegedly because of a liberal bias.

Whether sufficient coverage has been given to the trial we would leave for others to judge. The formula for whether any one criminal trial rises to national stature has always seemed difficult to fathom or predict — even for those in the media. But in the Internet age, it doesn't strike us as especially difficult to find daily coverage of the trial — at least given that a gag order bars lawyers from discussing their efforts.

What seems far more noteworthy is to draw the conclusion that any lack of attention to the horrific case reflects a politically liberal bias. Indeed, the circumstances at Dr. Gosnell's clinic would seem to strongly support what pro-abortion rights groups have been saying for years — that abortion needs to be safe, accessible and rare and that this is currently not the case for millions of American women.

Dr. Gosnell was not running the Mayo Clinic, as his own lawyer has pointed out during opening arguments. He was providing abortions to poor minority and immigrant women. He had gotten into plenty of trouble before — some 46 lawsuits in the course of 32 years, yet Pennsylvania regulators had paid little attention to what seems like obvious malpractice. It was only after authorities noted the doctor's proclivity for writing prescription painkillers to alleged addicts and drug dealers that the FBI and DEA raided his office several years ago.

Employing untrained staff and operating under barbaric conditions, Dr. Gosnell is a poster child for what happens when the poor lack sufficient family planning services. As states pass laws that make it more difficult for legitimate abortion providers to operate, the potential for a bad operator to prosper greatly increases. As it happens, the number of free-standing clinics in Pennsylvania has fallen by about one-third in recent years.

That's not to excuse Dr. Gosnell, who operated outside the law — allegedly killing infants after they had been born alive. But it's hard to believe such an appalling practice could exist if anti-choice forces were not constantly threatening legitimate health care providers and their patients (sometimes, with violence) and access to abortion by low-income women hadn't been deliberately made so difficult (or expensive, as Medicaid doesn't cover it).

Nor, should it be noted, would such procedures even be necessary in as many cases if women had greater access to birth control and comprehensive sex education. Yet certain states continue to pile on restrictions on abortion or even access to RU 486, a cheaper, safer alternative than a late-term abortion. The latest — and most obviously unconstitutional — would give "personhood" status to an embryo from the moment of fertilization.

How can anyone be shocked that back-alley abortion operations (or their storefront equivalents) appear when more legitimate clinics are forced out of business? That's the kind of environment that existed prior to Roe v. Wade and could easily return. Illegal abortions are far more likely to be unsafe abortions.

Not enough coverage of Dr. Gosnell for the tastes of Fox News, Michelle Malkin, Breitbart.com or the others in the conservative media? That's a curious charge given that they hadn't latched onto the case until this month either. Nor had Republican members of Congress, for that matter. Perhaps it's because the trial is such a cautionary tale for those who want to deny poor women the right to decent medical care, including abortion.

And it may also reflect the desire of conservatives to see everything — what appears in the media and what doesn't — as a product of liberal bias. That obsession defines American's right-wing as much as shrinking government or reducing taxes. That the heart of the Gosnell case is medical malpractice, lax government regulation and the dearth of decent health care for the poor would appear to concern them not one whit.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The GOP isn't waging a 'war on women'

    The GOP isn't waging a 'war on women'

    Oh, how your editorial tries to make Republicans look cruel and uncaring: "it's human nature to hear the words 'heart' and 'lungs' and think potential person, with your mind making the short leap to baby" ("The GOP's never-ending war on women," Aug. 5). If the words heart and lung were coming from...

  • Abortion, like human sacrifice, must come to an end

    Abortion, like human sacrifice, must come to an end

    The Sun continues to usher in this age of universal deceit with its editorial "GOP's never-ending war on women" (Aug. 4). Is it not glaringly obvious that the "little women" being savaged by Planned Parenthood's practice meet your standards of "war?" It is unreasonable to suggest, as members of...

  • Supreme Court decisions won't limit women's rights [Letter]

    Supreme Court decisions won't limit women's rights [Letter]

    Jenny Black, the president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Maryland, has condemned the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby decision and another case striking down a Massachusetts law barring protesters from coming within 30 feet of an abortion clinic ("In 2014, why are women still struggling to get basic...

  • Needed: An honest conversation about abortion

    Needed: An honest conversation about abortion

    As Americans celebrate and reflect on the Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade ruling 42 years ago, Planned Parenthood of Maryland urges lawmakers to listen to doctors and medical experts who know that legal abortion is safe and that politicians should not interfere in personal medical decisions.

  • This is why conservatives want to de-fund Planned Parenthood

    This is why conservatives want to de-fund Planned Parenthood

    Having read The Sun's recent editorial on the "GOP's never-ending war on women" (August 5), what I really glean The Sun's never ending war on Republicans in general and conservatives in particular. The editorial attempts to connect the pro-life movement's opposition to funding Planned Parenthood...

  • The GOP's never-ending war on women

    The GOP's never-ending war on women

    The GOP is once again showing it's out of touch with women, threatening a government shutdown next month over funding of Planned Parenthood in an effort to curtail abortions. Never mind that federal funds can't legally be spent on abortions except in rare cases. Never mind that abortion services...

  • War on women? Try war on babies.

    War on women? Try war on babies.

    The Sun's response to the Planned Parenthood scandal is merely parroting Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richard's response to being caught in the apparent harvesting, trafficking and selling of baby organs ("The GOP's never-ending war on women," Aug. 4). One director even haggled over the...

  • After Obamacare, do we need Planned Parenthood?

    After Obamacare, do we need Planned Parenthood?

    Regarding columnist Cal Thomas' recent commentary on Planned Parenthood, the organization exists to provide reproductive health care to those who can't afford it ("Why selling baby parts should shock no one," July 26).

Comments
Loading
72°