Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

We're a nation of dependents, all right — dependent on rich corporations for jobs that pay a living wage

Former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. writes about "How the welfare state has grown" (April 7). But if the programs of the New Deal and the Great Society have been less than successful, it should be noted that the lack of funding from "big government" has been instrumental in causing these programs to crumble.

The working poor are poor due to unemployment or low-wage jobs. Try making ends meet with subsistence level pay and no benefits. One major medical bill and you're on the way to homelessness.

The solution isn't providing mandatory minimum wage jobs with no benefits — basically a safety net with very large holes.

The working poor are "dependent" to the extent that they depend on employers who make hundreds of times what the average worker takes home.

Ideally, a solution would involve fair-wage jobs, i.e., ones that provided enough income to pay for a modest home and feed and clothe one's family.

If a corporation cannot or will not pay a fair wage, an earned income tax credit (a negative income tax) would take effect to supplement the low salary. That would result in a living wage for the worker.

In addition, single-payer universal health care is something that should be a offered by any civilized society.

The United States is not a nation of dependence so much as it is a nation of the very wealthy and the rest of us.

Lee Lears, Annapolis

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]
      Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

      It's the political season, which explains another column of "Things That Bug Me." Herewith my latest list for your consideration:

    • Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden
      Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden

      Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. does not look at the big picture. Is this because he is not interested in giving a fair presentation? In his most recent column (tax bill for government at all levels.

    • What Obama should have said
      What Obama should have said

      Here is what President Barack Obama should have said when he addressed the American people after his party's massive losses in Tuesday's election:

    • American values under Obama
      American values under Obama

      Two columns ago, I passed on a series of political observations from the heartland. Today, a snapshot of American values and viewpoints a decade and a half into the "new" millennium.

    • Hillary all over again
      Hillary all over again

      With the exception of President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton is the most recognized American politician of this era. Today, she is far and away the Democratic front runner for president. Many believe she is the odds on favorite to win it all — a view supported by a variety of public...

    • Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur
      Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

      The Sun's front page recently carried the article, "Ehrlich entertains presidential hopes" (Dec. 3), yet it was not April 1. Surely, this was a joke. It's even more preposterous than Martin O'Malley running for president!

    Comments
    Loading