Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

We're a nation of dependents, all right — dependent on rich corporations for jobs that pay a living wage

Former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. writes about "How the welfare state has grown" (April 7). But if the programs of the New Deal and the Great Society have been less than successful, it should be noted that the lack of funding from "big government" has been instrumental in causing these programs to crumble.

The working poor are poor due to unemployment or low-wage jobs. Try making ends meet with subsistence level pay and no benefits. One major medical bill and you're on the way to homelessness.

The solution isn't providing mandatory minimum wage jobs with no benefits — basically a safety net with very large holes.

The working poor are "dependent" to the extent that they depend on employers who make hundreds of times what the average worker takes home.

Ideally, a solution would involve fair-wage jobs, i.e., ones that provided enough income to pay for a modest home and feed and clothe one's family.

If a corporation cannot or will not pay a fair wage, an earned income tax credit (a negative income tax) would take effect to supplement the low salary. That would result in a living wage for the worker.

In addition, single-payer universal health care is something that should be a offered by any civilized society.

The United States is not a nation of dependence so much as it is a nation of the very wealthy and the rest of us.

Lee Lears, Annapolis

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan
      Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

      Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

    • Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur
      Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

      The Sun's front page recently carried the article, "Ehrlich entertains presidential hopes" (Dec. 3), yet it was not April 1. Surely, this was a joke. It's even more preposterous than Martin O'Malley running for president!

    • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'
      Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

      Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the...

    • Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'
      Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'

      OK, I can't help myself. Over the past three years, I have written at least a dozen columns critical of Obamacare (a.k.a. The "Affordable Care Act") in this space and devoted an entire chapter to the topic in my book "America: Hope for Change."

    • Hillary all over again
      Hillary all over again

      With the exception of President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton is the most recognized American politician of this era. Today, she is far and away the Democratic front runner for president. Many believe she is the odds on favorite to win it all — a view supported by a variety of public...

    • What Obama should have said
      What Obama should have said

      Here is what President Barack Obama should have said when he addressed the American people after his party's massive losses in Tuesday's election:

    • Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden
      Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden

      Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. does not look at the big picture. Is this because he is not interested in giving a fair presentation? In his most recent column (tax bill for government at all levels.

    • Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong
      Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong

      I'm often perplexed by the content in Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column and wonder if he is free from fact-checking because his words appear on the op-ed page. One particular paragraph in his column, "American values under Obama" (Nov. 2), left me even more confused than usual.

    Comments
    Loading